DRAC: A Randomized Controlled Trial on EGBD vs PC for Acute Cholecystitis.

Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02212717
Collaborator
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Other), Tokyo Medical University (Other), Kinki University (Other), University of Barcelona (Other)
60
4
2
55
15
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Acute cholecystitis commonly occurs in elderly patients that are high-risk candidates for surgery. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is frequently employed for gallbladder drainage in these patients. Recently, the feasibility of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD) in treatment of this condition has been demonstrated but how the two procedures compare to one another is uncertain.

The aim of this study is to compare EGBD versus PC as a definitive treatment, in high-risk patients suffering from acute cholecystitis in a randomized controlled trial. We hypothesize that EGBD can reduce the morbidity, re-intervention and mortality when compared to PC.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD)
  • Procedure: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC)
Phase 2/Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Endosonography-guided Gallbladder Drainage (EGBD) Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy (PC) in Patients Suffering From Acute Cholecystitis That Are Unsuitable for Surgery. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage

Procedure: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD)
The gallbladder would be identified by a linear echoendoscope (EUS) and a suitable puncture site in the stomach or the duodenum without intervening blood vessels would be located. The gallbladder would be punctured with a 19-gauge needle and a guidewire would be passed through the needle and looped in the gallbladder. The Hot AXIOS stent would then be inserted. A naso-gallbladder drain or a 5-7Fr double pigtail stents can be inserted into gallbladder if the effluent failed to clear after irrigation. This would be performed to improve drainage and avoid obstruction of the stent.

Active Comparator: Percutaneous cholecystomy

Procedure: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC)
Trained interventional radiologists in the respective hospitals would perform the procedure under local anesthesia. A transhepatic route would be used in all patients to decrease bile leakage. An 8.5 Fr pigtail drainage catheter would be placed between the 8th or 9th intercostal space under sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance. The pigtail catheter would be drained to a bedside bag.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall morbidities [1 years]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Technical success [30 days]

    Technical success is defined as the ability to access and drain the gallbladder by placement of a drainage tube or stent.

  2. Pain scores [7 days]

    Pain assessment would be performed using the visual-analogue scale (1 to 100) on post-procedural days 1 to 7.

  3. Analgesic requirements [7 days]

    The amount of analgesic consumed during admission will be recorded and compared between groups. Oral panadol and intravenous tramadol (or equivalent) would be provided as required to patients.

  4. Stone clearance rates [1 years]

    The presence or absence of gallstones after 1 years would be assessed by abdominal ultrasonography

  5. Clinical success [30 days]

    Clinical success is obtained when the patient is afebrile and had more than 20% decrease in white cell counts.

  6. Reintervention rate [1 year]

    The number of patients requiring biliary related re-interventions within 1 year

  7. Re-admission rate [1 year]

    The number of patients requiring hospital re-admissions due to biliary related events

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years old admitted for acute cholecystitis but are unsuitable for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor premorbid conditions including: American society of anesthesiology grading ≥ 3, APACHE score ≥ 12, limited life expectancy (less than 2 years) or deemed unsuitable for general anesthesia would be included.

  • Written informed consent from patient or guardian who is able to understand the nature and possible consequences of the study

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Pregnancy

  • Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments

  • Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder

  • Patients diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or pancreatitis (defined as elevated serum amylase more than three times the upper limit of normal)

  • Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum

  • Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices

  • Abnormal coagulation: INR > 1.5 and/or platelets < 50.000/mm3

  • Previous drainage of the gallbladder

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong China
2 Kinki University Hospital Osaka Japan
3 Tokyo Medical University Hospital Tokyo Japan
4 University Hospital Rio Hortega Barcelona Spain

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Tokyo Medical University
  • Kinki University
  • University of Barcelona

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Anthony Teoh, Honorary Associate Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02212717
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CREC-2014.301-T
First Posted:
Aug 8, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Jul 30, 2019
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2019
Keywords provided by Anthony Teoh, Honorary Associate Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 30, 2019