IPD Meta-analysis of De-escalation Treatment Strategy After PCI in ACS

Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04848766
Collaborator
ST. Antonius hospital Nieuwegein (Other), Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich (Other)
9,000
1
5.8
1547.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

We will perform a systemic review of previously published data and an updated patient-level meta-analysis of studies, including the most recent publications. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the United States National Institutes of Health registry of clinical trials, and relevant websites were searched for pertinent published studies.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: De-escalation Treatment Strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy

Detailed Description

This is an individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPD Meta-analysis). This study population was incorporated from studies that were previoiusly published.

We will perform a systemic review of previously published data and an updated patient-level meta-analysis of studies, including the most recent publications. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the United States National Institutes of Health registry of clinical trials, and relevant websites were searched for pertinent published studies. The electronic search strategy was complemented by manual examination of references cited by included articles, recent reviews, editorials, and meta-analyses. No restrictions were imposed on language, study period, or sample size. The search keywords include "acute coronary syndrome", "ACS", "primary", "percutaneous coronary intervention", "PCI", "de-escalation", "guided", "guide", "antiplatelet", "P2Y12 inhibitor", "P2Y12", "dual antiplatelet therapy", "DAPT".

Articles were included when they met the following prespecified criteria: (1) included the ACS patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES); (2) maintained DAPT for 1 year; (3) de-escalation strategy of DAPT was clearly defined; (4) clinical outcomes, including ischemic and bleeding events, were clearly reported; (5) randomized controlled trials were considered for inclusion. Two independent investigators screened titles and abstracts, identified duplicated studies, performed full-article reviews, and determined the study inclusion. The third investigator supervised the searching process and adjudicated all the disagreements.

After selecting eligible RCTs, we will incorporate all known randomized controlled trials requesting individual patient data from the principal investigator of each trial.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational [Patient Registry]
Anticipated Enrollment :
9000 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Other
Official Title:
Comparison of De-escalation Treatment Strategy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 7, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
De-escalation treatment group

Patients diagnosed as acute coronary syndrome, and who receive de-escalation antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

Drug: De-escalation Treatment Strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy
Patients receive de-escalation treatment of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

Conventional treatment group

Patients diagnosed as acute coronary syndrome, and who receive conventional (non-de-escalation) antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE) [1 year after intervention]

    composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and major bleeding.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Composite endpoint of Major adverse cardiovascular outcomes [1 year after intervention]

    all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke

  2. Major Bleeding outcome defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria [1 year after intervention]

    Bleeding outcomes, defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria

  3. Individual components of the primary outcome [1 year after intervention]

    all-cause mortality

  4. Individual components of the primary outcome [1 year after intervention]

    cardiovascular mortality

  5. Individual components of the primary outcome [1 year after intervention]

    non-cardiovascular mortality

  6. Individual components of the primary outcome [1 year after intervention]

    myocardial infarction

  7. Individual components of the primary outcome [1 year after intervention]

    stroke

  8. Individual components of the primary outcome [1 year after intervention]

    any coronary revascularization

  9. Individual components of the primary outcome [1 year after intervention]

    any bleeding

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
19 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All

This study is a meta-analysis of previously published studies. Therefore, the eligibility criteria may be diverse according to the individual studies.


Inclusion Criteria:
  • Subject must have clinical diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome
Exclusion Criteria:
  • The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea, Republic of

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital
  • ST. Antonius hospital Nieuwegein
  • Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kyung Woo Park, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hyo-Soo Kim, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04848766
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • De-escal-meta
First Posted:
Apr 19, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jun 8, 2021
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Hyo-Soo Kim, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 8, 2021