The Reducing Exercise Sensitivity With Exposure Training (RESET) Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study investigates the feasibility of conducting a home-based reducing exercise sensitivity with exposure training (RESET) intervention among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors. RESET is an at-home, 4 visit intervention that involves psychoeducation, a brief, low-to-moderate intensity walking session (i.e., interoceptive exposure), and interoceptive counseling, and is designed to reduce exercise sensitivity (i.e., fear of exercise sensations) and improve participation in exercise-based secondary-prevention guidelines (cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity). The primary purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of recruiting and administering the RESET intervention in ACS patients.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Fear of exercise may be prominent among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors due to the presence of physical disease states that can exacerbate uncertainty about bodily sensations. For instance, patients may perceive physical sensations experienced during exercise (e.g., increased heart rate, shortness of breath, fatigue) as dangerous, intolerable, or similar to sensations experienced or attributed to their ACS, resulting in a fear of exercise sensations (i.e., exercise sensitivity). As a result, patients may avoid heart healthy activities, such as cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and physical activity, that prompt these physical sensations or terminate activities at the first sign of discomfort. Novel programs that target patient-level fears related to exercise sensations (i.e., exercise sensitivity) during the first-year post-discharge (the time window patients are eligible for CR) may be needed to improve CR participation and physical activity levels.
To the investigator's knowledge, no intervention has been developed specifically to reduce exercise sensitivity in ACS survivors within the first year post-hospital discharge; a vulnerable population that is extremely sedentary, fails to meet physical activity guidelines, and with the most to gain from CR and physical activity participation. Thus, the investigator developed a de novo protocol for a reducing exercise sensitivity with exposure training (RESET) intervention.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Reducing Exercise Sensitivity with Exposure Training Participants in this group complete 4, at-home reducing exercise sensitivity with exposure training (RESET) intervention visits with research-trained personnel via video visits. They complete psychoeducation with an exercise physiology-trained scientist, and a brief walking activity (i.e., interoceptive exposure), followed by a session reflecting upon their walking experience with research-trained personnel (i.e., interoceptive counseling). Participants also complete weekly physical activity journals throughout the intervention. Each RESET intervention visits can occur once or twice per week over the course of 4 weeks, based on patient preference. |
Behavioral: Reducing Exercise Sensitivity with Exposure Training
Participants complete 4, home-based intervention visits on a secure video visit platform. Video visits include psychoeducation, interoceptive exposure, and interoceptive counseling. For homework, participants are asked to document their weekly physical activity and exercise sensations in a journal.
Psychoeducation: Participants are educated about the benefits and safety of exercise and cardiac rehabilitation, the role of fear and anxiety in exercise avoidance, and the concept of interoceptive exposure.
Interoceptive Exposure: A gradual six-minute walk (G6MW) serves as a low-risk form of interoceptive exposure. Exercise sensations and ratings of perceived intensity and distress are collected before and after the G6MW.
Interoceptive Counseling: Participants review and reflect upon their pre-walking and post-walking physical sensations and ratings (intensity and distress) with a research team member. Homework is also reviewed.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Proportion of participants that are adherent to the intervention (Intervention Adherence) [Assessed after enrollment (baseline) and until pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)]
As a measure of adherence, the investigator will assess the proportion of participants that complete a majority of the home-based RESET intervention visits.
- Proportion of participants who complete the outcome assessments upon program completion [Assessed after pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)]
This is to assess the feasibility of program completion
- Proportion of RESET sessions administered as intended [Assessed throughout administration of the pilot study (Up to 4 weeks)]
As a measure of intervention fidelity, the investigator will assess the proportion of participants that had a majority of their home-based RESET intervention administered as intended as per completion of a fidelity checklist.
- Proportion of participants who report adequate acceptability of the intervention [Assessed after pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)]
The investigator will assess the proportion of participants who report scores ≥4 for their rating of the patient-perceived intervention's acceptability on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure.
- Proportion of participants who report adequate feasibility of the intervention [Assessed after pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)]
The investigator will assess the proportion of participants who report scores ≥4 for their rating of the patient-perceived intervention's feasibility on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure.
- Proportion of participants who report adequate appropriateness of the intervention [Assessed after pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)]
The investigator will assess the proportion of participants who report scores ≥4 for their rating of the patient-perceived intervention's appropriateness on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in Exercise Sensitivity Questionnaire Score [baseline and after pilot study completion (4 weeks)]
The investigator will assess pre- to post-intervention change in exercise sensitivity using the Exercise Sensitivity Questionnaire (ESQ). The ESQ is an 18-item instrument designed to assess exercise sensitivity, specifically for use in adults with cardiac rehabilitation-qualifying conditions. Items reflect fear and anxiety of various bodily sensations and are rated from 0 to 4 ("not at all" to "very much), based on agreement with each statement. Scores of all the items are summed to create a total score, where higher scores reflect more sever exercise sensitivity.
- Change in self-reported physical activity and sitting [baseline and after pilot study completion (4 weeks)]
The investigator will assess pre- to post-intervention change in physical activity and sitting using the short form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The short form IPAQ is a 7-item, open-ended questionnaire eliciting participant's last 7-day recall of physical activity to assess the time spent in different physical activities (vigorous, moderate, walking) and sitting as part of their everyday lives. The outcome is an estimate of total physical activity in MET-min/week and time spent sitting.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age 18 years or older
-
Speak and read English
-
A diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) based on ICD10 codes in the electronic health record within the past 12 months.
-
Scored >1 (sometimes, often, or very often) on at least one item from the Aversive Cognitions about Physical Activity Scale
-
Express interest in participating
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Severe disabling chronic medical and/or psychiatric comorbidities determined on a case-by-case basis that prevent safe or adequate participation
-
Participated in >1 cardiac rehabilitation program session within the past 12 months
-
Unable to comply with the protocol (either self-selected or indicated during screening that s/he could not complete all requested tasks) for reasons that include, but are not limited to, patients with a level of cognitive impairment indicative of dementia, patients with current alcohol or substance abuse, patients with a significant movement disorder that interferes with walking, and patients with severe mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia)
-
Unavailable for follow-up for reasons such as terminal illness and imminent plans to leave the United States (as we have migrant or mobile patients due to their citizenship and work issues).
-
Do not own either a tablet or smartphone (iPhone or Android) to conduct Zoom video visits
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Columbia University Irving Medical Center | New York | New York | United States | 10032 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Columbia University
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrea T Duran, PhD, Columbia University
- Study Director: Ian Kronish, MD, Florence Irving Associate Professor of Medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, Jaffe AS, Jneid H, Kelly RF, Kontos MC, Levine GN, Liebson PR, Mukherjee D, Peterson ED, Sabatine MS, Smalling RW, Zieman SJ; ACC/AHA Task Force Members. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):e344-426. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Erratum in: Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):e433-4. Dosage error in article text.
- Duran AT, Ewing Garber C, Cornelius T, Schwartz JE, Diaz KM. Patterns of Sedentary Behavior in the First Month After Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e011585. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011585. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
- Eifert GH. Cardiophobia: a paradigmatic behavioural model of heart-focused anxiety and non-anginal chest pain. Behav Res Ther. 1992 Jul;30(4):329-45. Review. Erratum in: Behav Res Ther 1993 Sep;31(7):711.
- Farris SG, Abrantes AM, Bond DS, Stabile LM, Wu WC. Anxiety and Fear of Exercise in Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation: PATIENT AND PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019 Mar;39(2):E9-E13. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000401.
- Kronish IM, Diaz KM, Goldsmith J, Moise N, Schwartz JE. Objectively Measured Adherence to Physical Activity Guidelines After Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 7;69(9):1205-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.087.
- AAAT6275
- P30AG064198