PULSE: Angiographic Control vs. Ischemia-driven Management of Patients Treated With PCI on Left Main With Drug-eluting Stents

Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04144881
Collaborator
Università degli Studi di Ferrara (Other), Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano (Other), Ospedale Santa Croce-Carle Cuneo (Other), Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS (Other), AUSL Romagna Rimini (Other)
550
3
2
36
183.3
5.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The present study aims to compare a planned angiographic control (PAC) follow-up strategy vs. conservative management for patients treated with drug-eluting stents on unprotected left main artery in a prospective, randomized setting. PAC will be performed by coronary computed tomography (CCT), to avoid the limitations of the invasive coronary angiography which is usually employed to perform PAC. The superiority of a PAC-based approach will be tested on a hard clinical end-point such as the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. The investigators will also assess the performance of CCT as a tool to perform PAC.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: coronary computed tomography
N/A

Detailed Description

Given the undefined picture surrounding the appropriateness of planned angiographic control (PAC) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main (ULM) with drug-eluting stents (DES), our aim is to evaluate, in a prospective, randomized, setting, the potential benefits of a PAC-based strategy vs. ischemia and symptoms driven conservative management. The disease of the native ULM is associated with an unfavorable prognostic outcome, which can be at least partially reversed by revascularization. Significant stenosis of the stented ULM caused by in-stent restenosis (ISR), however, presents some peculiar pathophysiological, flow-related and shear-stress features, which partly makes it a distinct disease as compared to native vessel atherosclerosis. Treatment of ISR, moreover, is a scarcely standardized and often complex procedure; some uncertainties still persist regarding the best strategy to treat ISR (stent-in-stent, drug-eluting balloons, dilation with conventional balloons). Computed coronary tomography (CCT) can precisely and not-invasively assess the presence of ISR in the stented ULM, without exposing the patients to the risks of invasive catheterization. CCT may provide an accurate reconstruction of the stented vessels, exposing the patients to a limited amount of contrast dye (approximately, 80-100 cc) and of radiation dose (approximately, 92 mGy). CCT has a very high negative predictive value for ISR, thus limiting the negative impact of the indiscriminate execution of invasive angiography on all patients treated by PCI of the ULM. Only patients with relevant ISR of ULM at CCT will undergo coronary angiography to confirm the presence of critical stenosis, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) will be performed in dubious cases.

An increased rate of PCI has to be taken in to account with a PAC-based approach. However, with the accurate, stepwise selection of the patients and the lesions amenable to PCI of our study protocol, based on CCT, coronary angiography and, where necessary, FFR/IVUS, the increased rate of PCI is not expected to bear a negative prognostic impact. Based on these premises, our hypothesis is that early, appropriate, detection of ULM ISR and its subsequent treatment may positively impact patients' survival and reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events.

Specific aim 1:

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a PAC-based approach to follow-up patients treated by PCI of the ULM with DES-II

Specific aim 2:

Assessment of the incidence of ISR in patients undergoing PCI of the ULM with DES-II and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CCT in the evaluation of ISR in the stented ULM

Specific Aim 3:

Assessment of the prognostic implications and safety of the PCI of ISR of the ULM detected by PAC as compared to conservative management with revascularization driven by symptoms and ischemia.

For this purpose in this prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients will be enrolled following the index percutaneous revascularization of ULM with DES. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to PAC-based management with CCT vs.

symptoms and ischemia driven conservative management.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
550 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Angiographic Control vs. Ischemia-driven Management of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Revascularization of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery With Second-generation Drug Eluting Stents: the PULSE Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 15, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 15, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 15, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: coronary computed tomography

Diagnostic Test: coronary computed tomography
patients randomized in this arm will perform computed coronary tomography 6 months after the index percutaneous revascularization on unprotected left main artery

No Intervention: conservative (ischemia-guided) management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [18 months after the index revascularization]

    composite and mutual exclusive end point including death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) (excluding periprocedural MI), unstable angina (UA), stent thrombosis

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) [18 months after the index revascularization]

    target lesion revascularization including any TLR, any unplanned TLR and TLR driven by PAC

  2. All cause death [within 18 months from the index revascularization]

    death from any cause occurring during follow up

  3. stent thrombosis [within 18 months from the index revascularization]

    Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable or possible)

  4. CV death [within 18 months from the index revascularization]

    death from cardiovascular causes

  5. Myocardial infarction [within 18 months from the index revascularization]

    Myocardial infarction defined as non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NST-ACS) or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Other Outcome Measures

  1. AKI [2 days after CCT in the experimental arm]

    Acute kidney injury (AKI) following CCT will constitute safety end-point

  2. Renal function impairment [18 months after the index revascularization]

    reduction of glomerular filtration rate of >24% or end-stage chronic kidney disease

  3. Overall bleedings [18 months after the index revascularization]

    Any bleeding regardless of severity, defined according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria

  4. Major bleedings [18 months after the index revascularization]

    BARC bleedings type III-IV-V

  5. procedural complications [Index hospitalization]

    Procedural complications following each percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): periprocedural MI defined, arterial access site complications, acute kidney injury

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with ULM disease treated by PCI with DES-II with the following inclusion criteria:
  • Age 18-85.

  • Glomerular filtration rate > 30 ml/min Indication to percutaneous revascularization of ULM according to Syntax score (< 33) or, in dubious cases, after Heart Team evaluation

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Cardiogenic shock

  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara Ferrara Italy 44124
2 Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano Orbassano Italy 10043
3 AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Torino Italy 10126

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
  • Università degli Studi di Ferrara
  • Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano
  • Ospedale Santa Croce-Carle Cuneo
  • Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
  • AUSL Romagna Rimini

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, MD, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Medical Doctor, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04144881
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PULSE
First Posted:
Oct 30, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Nov 4, 2019
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 4, 2019