Use of a Mobile Remote Device to Optimize Pediatric Inter-facility Transportation: A Feasibility Study

Sponsor
University of Saskatchewan (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02915640
Collaborator
(none)
69
3
2
14
23
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study compares the utilization of remote technology versus not using remote technology when triaging and managing pediatric patients in remote settings prior to pediatric specialized inter-facility transportation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Remote technology
N/A

Detailed Description

Paediatric Specialized Inter-facility transport utilizes specialized teams usually made up of a respiratory therapist, paediatric critical care nurse, and paediatric intensivist as medical control. When a Nurse Practitioner or General Practitioner from a remote site has a paediatric acute care referral and wants to arrange transportation there is an initial call at which point there are two priorities: first is obtain a patient history and then provide advice to the remote caregiver to initiate specific therapies; second is to mobilize the specialized team to the patient. The period of time between giving initial advice while dispatching the team and the time when the team arrives, can often be a vulnerable period for the remote caregiver as well as the patient. The ability to directly visualize and assess the patient during this time, as well as assist the specialized team once they arrive may provide improvement in safety and care of the patient. It may also improve triaging and may make the stabilization and departure time more efficient.

Remote technology will be used for an initial patient assessment after being contacted by phone from the peripheral centre to transfer an acutely ill paediatric patient as assessed by the referral centre care provider. After assessment the patient will be triaged to either remain in the local community, transferred to a regional hospital that provides paediatric acute care (Prince Albert), or be transported to Royal University Hospital in Saskatoon for tertiary care. Data to be collected includes:

  • Duration of time from the beginning of the initial phone call to the first therapeutic intervention

  • Time to stabilization

  • Time to decision for disposition

  • The duration of contact with the health care provider and the patient

  • Number of scheduled follow-up contacts for a specific patient within 24 hours

  • Number of times the referring centre re-consults

  • Of the patients who triaged to stay in the local community how many were transported to the tertiary care centre within 24hrs

  • How many patients who arrived at the tertiary care centre were discharged within 24hrs

  • How many patients on arrival were deemed to be unnecessary

The nurses and physicians who are communicating with the Intensivist about the case will complete a post-encounter survey to evaluate their experience.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
69 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Remote Technology for Paediatric Patient Assessment, Stabilization and Triaging Prior to Paediatric Inter-facility Transportation: A Feasibility Study
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Remote technology

Remote technology will be used for an initial patient assessment after being contacted by phone from the peripheral center to transfer an acutely ill pediatric patient as assessed by the referral centre care provider.

Other: Remote technology
Utilization of remote technology versus not using remote technology when triaging and managing pediatric patients in remote settings prior to pediatric specialized inter-facility transportation.

No Intervention: Control

A Nurse Practitioner or General Practitioner from a remote site has a pediatric acute care referral and arranges a transportation. There is an initial call to obtain a patient history, to provide advice to the remote caregiver to initiate specific therapies and to mobilize the specialized team to the patient.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Transport number in the cases (with the robot) versus the controls (without the robot) [One year]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Tertiary care hospital length of stay in the cases versus the controls [One year]

  2. The number of patients transported to the regional hospitals in the cases (with the robot) versus the controls (without the robot) [One year]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A to 17 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Remote Technology Group Inclusion:
  • Patients ≤ 17 years from peripheral centre (Pelican Narrows Clinic and Regina General Hospital).

  • Acutely ill.

  • Being considered for medical transport.

Control Group Inclusion:
  • Patients ≤ 17 years from peripheral centre (Stony Rapids, Wollaston Lake and Sandy Bay).

  • Chosen from a pre-existing Saskatchewan paediatric transport database.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients older than age 17.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Pelican Narrows Clinic (Angelique Canada Health Centre) Pelican Narrows Saskatchewan Canada S0P 0E0
2 Regina General Hospital Regina Saskatchewan Canada S4P 0W5
3 Royal University Hospital Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada S7N0W8

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Saskatchewan

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tanya Holt, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Tanya Holt, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Saskatchewan
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02915640
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PITROBOT-1
First Posted:
Sep 27, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Sep 27, 2016
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 27, 2016