SAFE-ECMO: Strategies for Anticoagulation During Venovenous ECMO
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Moderate intensity titrated dose anticoagulation has been used in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to prevent thromboembolism and thrombotic mechanical complications. As technology has improved, however, the incidence of thromboembolic events has decreased, leading to re-evaluation of the risks of anticoagulation, particularly during venovenous (V-V) ECMO. Recent data suggest that bleeding complications during V-V ECMO may be more strongly associated with mortality than thromboembolic complications, and case series have suggested that V-V ECMO can be safely performed without moderate or high intensity anticoagulation. At present, there is significant variability between institutions in the approach to anticoagulation during V-V ECMO. A definitive randomized controlled trial is needed to compare the effects of a low intensity fixed dose anticoagulation (low intensity) versus moderate intensity titrated dose anticoagulation (moderate intensity) on clinical outcomes during V-V ECMO. Before such a trial can be conducted, however, additional data are needed to inform the feasibility of the future trial.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Since the inception of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), moderate intensity titrated dose anticoagulation has been used to prevent clinically harmful thromboembolism and thrombotic mechanical complications. The impact of thromboembolic events on clinical outcomes during venovenous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), however, is unclear, and complications related to bleeding are common and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. These findings have led many experts to suggest that anticoagulation strategies during V-V ECMO should be re-evaluated.
Critical illness, in general, is associated with both coagulopathy and impaired hemostasis. These problems are compounded during ECMO by the artificial interface between blood and the non-biologic surface of the circuit components, which leads to activation of the coagulation system, consumptive thrombocytopenia, fibrinolysis, and thrombin generation. The sheer stress on blood components during ECMO also lead to destruction of high-molecular-weight von Willebrand multimers, interrupting primary hemostasis.
Both bleeding and thromboembolism are common complications during ECMO. Bleeding events have been associated with poor clinical outcomes, likely mediated by an increased incidence of intracranial hemorrhage during ECMO. During intra-operative cardiopulmonary bypass and venoarterial (V-A) ECMO, ischemic strokes are a common and potentially deadly complication. During V-V ECMO, however, the majority of thromboembolic events are cannula-associated DVT and circuit thromboses requiring exchange, which are of unclear clinical significance.
Various anticoagulation strategies have been proposed to balance the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism during V-V ECMO, including high intensity anticoagulation, moderate intensity anticoagulation, and low intensity anticoagulation (the equivalent of DVT prophylaxis). Observational studies have suggested that, compared to moderate intensity anticoagulation, low intensity anticoagulation reduces transfusion requirements without affecting the incidence of thrombosis, hemorrhage, or death. In one case series of 60 patients who were treated with only low-intensity subcutaneous heparin during V-V ECMO, rates of transfusions were lower than historical controls without any effect on the rate of thrombotic events. Similarly, a recent systematic review suggested that the rates of thromboembolism and circuit thrombosis among patients managed with a moderate intensity anticoagulation strategy during V-V ECMO were comparable to the rates reported among patients managed with a less intense anticoagulation strategy.
To date, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing low intensity to moderate intensity anticoagulation during V-V ECMO. Guidelines from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), the pre-eminent group for ECMO education and research, provide little guidance for the selection of anticoagulation strategy, and anticoagulation practices are highly variable across institutions. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed to determine the ideal strategy to anticoagulation during V-V ECMO. Before such a trial can be conducted, however, additional data are needed on the feasibility of randomizing patients to a specific anticoagulation strategy and study measurements.
To facilitate a large, multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing low intensity anticoagulation to moderate intensity anticoagulation during V-V ECMO, a pilot trial is needed to establish feasibility and the performance of the primary outcome measures.
Primary aim of the study: To demonstrate feasibility of a future large, multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing low intensity to moderate intensity anticoagulation among adults receiving V-V ECMO by demonstrating the ability to recruit and randomize participants, adhere to assigned anticoagulation strategy, and demonstrate adequate separation between groups in therapy delivered and intensity of anticoagulation achieved with the assigned anticoagulation strategies.
Secondary aim of the study: To define and estimate the frequency of the primary efficacy, primary safety, and secondary outcomes of a future large, multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing low intensity vs moderate intensity anticoagulation among adults receiving V-V ECMO.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Low Intensity Anticoagulation For patients assigned to the low intensity anticoagulation strategy, clinical teams will be instructed to initiate low intensity anticoagulation at doses and frequencies commonly used for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. The choice of anticoagulant, dose, and frequency of administration will be deferred to treating clinicians. |
Other: Low intensity anticoagulation
Participants assigned to the low intensity anticoagulation strategy will receive anticoagulation at doses used for DVT prophylaxis in critically ill patients. The choice of agent (e.g. heparin or enoxaparin) and specific dosing will be at the discretion of the treating clinicians and will be prospectively recorded.
|
| Active Comparator: Moderate Intensity Anticoagulation For patients assigned to the moderate intensity anticoagulation group, clinical teams will be instructed to initiate a continuous infusion of moderate intensity anticoagulation targeting either a partial thromboplastin time (PTT) of 40-60 seconds or an Anti-Xa level of 0.2 to 0.3 IU/mL. The choice of anticoagulant and approach to dosing will be deferred to treating clinicians. |
Other: Moderate Intensity Anticoagulation
Patients assigned to the moderate intensity anticoagulation strategy will receive anticoagulation targeting a PTT goal of 40-60 seconds or anti-Xa level of 0.2 to 0.3 IU/mL. Choice of anticoagulant and monitoring strategy (PTT or anti-Xa level) will be at the discretion of the treating clinicians and will be prospectively recorded. Anticoagulant drips will be titrated according to institutional protocols. For patients who survive to decannulation, the infusion will be stopped one hour prior to decannulation.
This approach to anticoagulation reflects the current approach for patients receiving V-V ECMO at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and is similar to protocols widely adopted for patients receiving V-V ECMO at other centers.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Frequency of major bleeding events [From randomization to until the date of death or the date 24 hours after decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Major bleeding event, according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis, defined as: Fatal bleeding Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intraarticular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome Clinically overt bleeding associated with either a drop in hemoglobin level by at least 2.0 grams/dL or leading to transfusion of two or more units of packed red blood cells
- Frequency of thromboembolic events [From randomization to until the date of death or the date 24 hours after decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Thromboembolic event defined as: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) Intra-cardiac thrombosis Ischemic stroke Acute circuit thrombosis requiring urgent circuit exchange Acute arterial thromboembolism
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Frequency of cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis [24-48 hours after decannulation]
Cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis, as measured by four-extremity venous ultrasounds obtained 24-72 hours following decannulation among patients who were decannulation
- Bleeding events per ECMO day [From from randomization to 24 hours after decannulation]
Number of major bleeding events per day of V-V ECMO
- Thromboembolic events per ECMO day [From from randomization to 24 hours after decannulation]
Number of thromboembolic events per day of V-V ECMO
- Bleeding events from randomization to the first of death or discharge [From date of randomization until the date of death or hospital discharge, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Number of bleeding events from date of randomization until the date of death or hospital discharge, whichever came first, up to 100 months
- Thromboembolic events from randomization to the first of death or discharge [From randomization until the date of death or hospital discharge, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Number of thromboembolic events from randomization until the date of death or hospital discharge, whichever came first, up to 100 months
- Frequency of circuit or circuit component exchanges [From randomization to the date of death or decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Circuit or circuit component exchange during ECMO support
- ECMO circuit durability [From randomization to the date of death or decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
The number of calendar days from randomization to death or decannulation divided by the Number of ECMO circuits used
- Red blood cell transfusion volume per ECMO day [From randomization to the date of death or decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Total volume of packed red blood cells transfused from randomization to death or decannulation divided by the number of calendar days during this period
- New Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia diagnosis [From randomization to the date of death or decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
New diagnosis of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia as measured by clinically obtained serotonin release assay
- Lowest platelet count [From randomization to the the date of death or the date 24 hours after decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Lowest clinically obtained platelet count
- Highest total and indirect bilirubin values [From randomization to the the date of death or the date 24 hours after decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Highest clinically obtained total and indirect bilirubin values
- Highest lactate dehydrogenase value [From randomization to the the date of death or the date 24 hours after decannulation, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Highest clinically obtained lactate dehydrogenase value
- Death attributable to a major bleeding event [From randomization to the date of death or discharge, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
In-hospital mortality attributable to a major bleeding event
- Death attributable to a thromboembolic event [From randomization to the date of death or discharge, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
In-hospital mortality attributable to a thromboembolic event
- Ventilator-free days [From randomization to the date of death or discharge, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Number of days alive and free from mechanical ventilation between randomization and day 28.
- ICU-free days [From randomization to the date of death or discharge, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Number of days alive and not in the ICU between randomization and day 28.
- Hospital-free days [From randomization to the date of death or discharge, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Number of days alive and not in the hospital between randomization and day 28.
- In-hospital mortality [From randomization to the date of death or discharge, whichever came first, through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Death prior to hospital discharge
Other Outcome Measures
- Number of patients screened per month [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Number of patients screened for study enrollment per month
- Number of patients eligible for the study [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Number of patients who are eligible for the study per month
- Number of and the specific exclusion criteria met [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
The specific exclusion criteria met (for any patient ineligible for enrollment)
- Number of and specific reasons for "missed" enrollments [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Reasons for "missed" enrollments (e.g. unavailability of research staff, refusal of clinical team to allow randomization, patient refusal of informed consent)
- Number of patients enrolled per month [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Number of patients enrolled in the study per month
- Proportion of patients adhering to randomized assignment [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Adherence to the assigned anticoagulation strategy will be adequate if more than 80% of patients have fewer than 10% of monitored values as major protocol violations.
- Hours receiving low intensity or moderate intensity anticoagulation [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Hours receiving low intensity or moderate intensity anticoagulation per day
- Time from ECMO cannulation to randomization (hours) [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Time from ECMO cannulation to randomization in hours
- Duration of the intervention period (days) [Through study completion, an average of 2 years.]
Duration of the intervention period, defined as the time from randomization to the first of: diagnosis of a major bleeding event, diagnosis of a thromboembolic event, placement of an arterial ECMO cannula, decannulation from ECMO, or death (days)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient receiving V-V ECMO
-
Patient is located in a participating unit of the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) adult hospital.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patient is pregnant
-
Patient is a prisoner
-
Patient is < 18 years old
-
Patient underwent ECMO cannulation greater than 24 hours prior to screening
-
Presence of an indication for systemic anticoagulation:
-
Ongoing receipt of systemic anticoagulation
-
Planned administration of anticoagulation for an indication other than ECMO
-
Presence of or plan to insert an arterial ECMO cannula
-
Presence of a contraindication to anticoagulation:
-
Active bleeding determined by treating clinicians to make anticoagulation unsafe
-
Major surgery or trauma less than 72 hours prior to randomization
-
Known history of a bleeding diathesis
-
Ongoing severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 30,000)
-
History of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
-
Heparin allergy
-
Positive SARS-CoV-2 test within prior 21 days or high clinical suspicion for COVID-19
-
The treating clinician determines that the patient's risks of thromboembolism or bleeding necessitate a specific approach to anticoagulation management during V-V ECMO
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37209 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Investigators
- Study Director: Jonathan D Casey, MD, MSc, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Aubron C, Cheng AC, Pilcher D, Leong T, Magrin G, Cooper DJ, Scheinkestel C, Pellegrino V. Factors associated with outcomes of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a 5-year cohort study. Crit Care. 2013 Apr 18;17(2):R73. doi: 10.1186/cc12681.
- Aubron C, DePuydt J, Belon F, Bailey M, Schmidt M, Sheldrake J, Murphy D, Scheinkestel C, Cooper DJ, Capellier G, Pellegrino V, Pilcher D, McQuilten Z. Predictive factors of bleeding events in adults undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0196-7. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
- Bembea MM, Annich G, Rycus P, Oldenburg G, Berkowitz I, Pronovost P. Variability in anticoagulation management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an international survey. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;14(2):e77-84. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31827127e4.
- Carter KT, Kutcher ME, Shake JG, Panos AL, Cochran RP, Creswell LL, Copeland H. Heparin-Sparing Anticoagulation Strategies Are Viable Options for Patients on Veno-Venous ECMO. J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:399-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.050. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
- Chlebowski MM, Baltagi S, Carlson M, Levy JH, Spinella PC. Clinical controversies in anticoagulation monitoring and antithrombin supplementation for ECMO. Crit Care. 2020 Jan 20;24(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2726-9. Review.
- Combes A, Leprince P, Luyt CE, Bonnet N, Trouillet JL, Léger P, Pavie A, Chastre J. Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):1404-11. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816f7cf7.
- Cooper E, Burns J, Retter A, Salt G, Camporota L, Meadows CI, Langrish CC, Wyncoll D, Glover G, Ioannou N, Daly K, Barrett NA. Prevalence of Venous Thrombosis Following Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Severe Respiratory Failure. Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):e581-4. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001277.
- Doyle AJ, Hunt BJ. Current Understanding of How Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenators Activate Haemostasis and Other Blood Components. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Dec 12;5:352. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00352. eCollection 2018. Review.
- ELSO. ELSO Anticoagulation Guidelines. 2014.
- Esper SA, Welsby IJ, Subramaniam K, John Wallisch W, Levy JH, Waters JH, Triulzi DJ, Hayanga JWA, Schears GJ. Adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an international survey of transfusion and anticoagulation techniques. Vox Sang. 2017 Jul;112(5):443-452. doi: 10.1111/vox.12514. Epub 2017 May 3.
- Kasirajan V, Smedira NG, McCarthy JF, Casselman F, Boparai N, McCarthy PM. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Apr;15(4):508-14.
- Krueger K, Schmutz A, Zieger B, Kalbhenn J. Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Prophylactic Subcutaneous Anticoagulation Only: An Observational Study in More Than 60 Patients. Artif Organs. 2017 Feb;41(2):186-192. doi: 10.1111/aor.12737. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
- Menaker J, Tabatabai A, Rector R, Dolly K, Kufera J, Lee E, Kon Z, Sanchez P, Pham S, Herr DL, Mazzeffi M, Rabinowitz RP, O'Connor JV, Stein DM, Scalea TM. Incidence of Cannula-Associated Deep Vein Thrombosis After Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2017 Sep/Oct;63(5):588-591. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000539.
- Munshi L, Walkey A, Goligher E, Pham T, Uleryk EM, Fan E. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30452-1. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
- Murphy DA, Hockings LE, Andrews RK, Aubron C, Gardiner EE, Pellegrino VA, Davis AK. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-hemostatic complications. Transfus Med Rev. 2015 Apr;29(2):90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 18. Review.
- Olson SR, Murphree CR, Zonies D, Meyer AD, Mccarty OJT, Deloughery TG, Shatzel JJ. Thrombosis and Bleeding in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Without Anticoagulation: A Systematic Review. ASAIO J. 2021 Mar 1;67(3):290-296. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001230.
- Saini A, Spinella PC. Management of anticoagulation and hemostasis for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Lab Med. 2014 Sep;34(3):655-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 24. Review.
- Schulman S, Kearon C; Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Apr;3(4):692-4.
- Tauber H, Ott H, Streif W, Weigel G, Loacker L, Fritz J, Heinz A, Velik-Salchner C. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation induces short-term loss of high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor multimers. Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):730-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000554.
- Wood KL, Ayers B, Gosev I, Kumar N, Melvin AL, Barrus B, Prasad S. Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Routine Systemic Anticoagulation Decreases Adverse Events. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 May;109(5):1458-1466. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.040. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
- Zangrillo A, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai G, Greco M, Greco T, Frati G, Patroniti N, Antonelli M, Pesenti A, Pappalardo F. A meta-analysis of complications and mortality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Sep;15(3):172-8. Review.
- 202210