STARRT-AKI: Standard Versus Accelerated Initiation of Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The objectives of this trial are to determine whether, in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), randomization to accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT), compared with standard initiation, is:
-
Feasible, in terms of adherence to the protocol (primary outcome), recruitment rates, and achievement of follow-up; and
-
Safe, from the perspective of potential adverse events associated with earlier initiation of RRT
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and devastating complication of critical illness. Once AKI is established, treatment is largely supportive and no intervention has been found to restore kidney function or improve overall survival. Renal replacement therapy (RRT), usually in the form of hemodialysis, is frequently needed to manage patients with severe AKI. Such patients have an in-hospital mortality that consistently exceeds 50%. Delay in the initiation of RRT has been implicated as a possible contributor to this poor outcome. A recent meta-analysis suggested that earlier initiation of RRT may improve survival. However, completed trials to date have been small, single centre, limited by study quality, and have shown considerable heterogeneity in terms of definitions used for "early" RRT initiation.
The objectives of this trial are to determine whether, in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), randomization to accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT), compared with standard initiation, is:
-
Feasible, in terms of adherence to the protocol (primary outcome), recruitment rates, and achievement of follow-up; and
-
Safe, from the perspective of potential adverse events associated with the earlier or later initiation of RRT
This pilot trial is intended to guide and inform the design of a phase III multicentre randomized trial of accelerated versus standard initiation of RRT in critically ill patients that will evaluate the impact of the intervention on 90-day all-cause mortality and recovery of kidney function.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard RRT initiation RRT is initiated >12 hours after eligibility determination. Once a decision is made to start RRT, a dialysis catheter will be placed and RRT initiated as soon as possible. |
Other: Standard RRT initiation
Patients will be carefully followed over a period of 7 days to identify potential indications for RRT. The trial team will ask that the clinical team consider RRT initiation if there are:
I. Criteria for persistent AKI (serum creatinine has not declined by more than 50% from value recorded at time of eligibility) AND
II. At least one of the following indications for RRT initiation:
Serum potassium ≥6.0 mmol/L, or
Serum bicarbonate ≤ 10 mmol/L, or
Evidence of severe respiratory failure, based on a PaO2/FiO2 <200 and bilateral infiltrates on the chest x-ray, or
By 72 hours after randomization, creatinine has not declined by more than 50% from that recorded at the time of randomization
|
Experimental: Accelerated RRT initiation A dialysis catheter will be placed and RRT initiated as soon as possible and within 12 hours of eligibility. |
Other: Accelerated RRT initiation
A dialysis catheter will be placed and RRT initiated as soon as possible and within 12 hours of eligibility. This 12 hour window includes the time needed to obtain consent.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Feasibility of protocol adherence [14 days]
>90% of participants in the accelerated initiation arm start RRT within 12 hours of eligibility AND >90% of participants randomized to the standard initiation arm who ultimately receive RRT, start RRT at least 12 hours following eligibility determination
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Feasibility of enrollment [14 days]
>50% of eligible patients are successfully enrolled in the trial
- Feasibility of 90-day follow-up [90 days]
Vital status and need for RRT at 90 days are successfully captured in >95% of participants
- Safety outcomes [14 days]
Serious adverse effects, with a particular focus on those that are potentially attributable to the study treatment, vascular accesss complications (including hemorrhage, thrombosis and infection) and complications associated with the delivery of RRT (dialysis-associated hypotension, electrolyte abnormalities) will be examined.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria (all of these need to be present):
-
Age ≥ 18 years
-
Admission to an intensive care unit
-
Evidence of kidney dysfunction (serum creatinine ≥ 100 µmol/L (women) or
≥ 130 µmol/L (men))
- Evidence of severe AKI defined by at least 2 of the following 3 criteria:
i-A 2-fold increase in serum creatinine during hospitalization or from a known pre-hospitalization baseline ii-Oliguria as defined by total urine output < 6 mL/kg over the preceding 12 hours iii-Whole blood Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) ≥ 400ng/mL
-
Likelihood that an absolute indication for RRT will not arise in the subsequent 24 hours based on the most recent bloodwork for the following parameters: i- Serum potassium ≤ 5.5 mmol/L and ii- Serum bicarbonate ≥ 15 mmol/L
-
Central venous pressure ≥ 8 mmHg
Exclusion Criteria (the presence of one of these would disqualify eligibility):
-
Lack of commitment to ongoing life support
-
Presence of a drug overdose that necessitates initiation of RRT
-
Any RRT within the previous 2 months
-
Presence or clinical suspicion of renal obstruction, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, or acute interstitial nephritis
-
Advanced chronic kidney disease, defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, based on pre-hospitalization blood work
-
Kidney transplant within the past 365 days
-
At the time of screening, doubling of serum creatinine has been present for > 48 hours
-
Clinician(s) caring for patient believe(s) that immediate dialysis is absolutely mandated
-
Clinician(s) caring for patient believe(s) that deferral of dialysis initiation is mandated
-
Patient or substitute decision maker can not provide consent within 12 hours of study eligibility
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Alberta Hospital | Edmonton | Alberta | Canada | T6G 2B7 |
2 | St. Joseph's Healthcare | Hamilton | Ontario | Canada | L8N 4A6 |
3 | London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital | London | Ontario | Canada | N6A 4G5 |
4 | London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital | London | Ontario | Canada | N6C 6B5 |
5 | The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada | K1H8L6 |
6 | The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada | K1Y 4E9 |
7 | St. Michael's Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5B 1W8 |
8 | University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5G 2N2 |
9 | Mount Sinai Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5G1X5 |
10 | Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
11 | Centre hopitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke | Sherbrooke | Quebec | Canada | J1H 5N4 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Unity Health Toronto
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Alere San Diego
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ron Wald, MDCM MPH, Unity Health Toronto
- Principal Investigator: Sean M Bagshaw, MD MSc, University of Alberta
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CIHR MOP 111116