Personalized Versus Standard Hydration for Prevention of CI-AKI: a Randomized Trial With Bioimpedance Analysis

Sponsor
Ospedale Misericordia e Dolce (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02225431
Collaborator
(none)
296
1
2
30.9
9.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in patients with "lower fluid status" defined by bioimpedance analysis, whether two different protocol of IV isotonic saline infusion are associated with different volume expansion and differing risks for CI-AKI in patients undergoing coronary angiographic procedures.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: sodium chloride infusion
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Iodinated contrast media are a well-recognized cause of iatrogenic acute kidney injury in patients undergoing imaging diagnostic or therapeutic procedures (contrast-induced acute kidney injury, CI-AKI).

Several protocols have been tested for the prevention of CI-AKI, including periprocedural hydration with isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate, antioxidant compounds, use of low- or iso-osmolar contrast agents, and hemofiltration or dialysis. The results of these interventions and strategies have been often disappointing or inconclusive and intravenous volume expansion remains the only therapy of undisputed efficacy.

Bioimpedance analysis is an inexpensive, rapid, and accurate tool for evaluating a patient's hydration status, and can be performed at the bedside within minutes [Maioli, JACC 1014;63:1387-94]. In this study we defined patients with "lower fluid status" with high risk of CI-AKI (Male with resistance/height ratio > 315 Ohm/meter and Female > 380 Ohm/meter). BIVA may represent the optimal tool to monitor the adequacy of volume expansion and protective strategy delivery.

However, most hydration protocols rely on a "one size fits all" approach with a fixed volume and time of infusion without an assessment of whether adequate hydration was achieved. This practice risks either under-hydration without true amelioration of CI-AKI risk or over-hydration with risk of adverse outcomes.

Thus, on the basis of results of BIVA testing a randomized fluid infusion plan is prescribed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
296 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Personalized Versus Standard Hydration for Prevention of Contrast Induced Acute Kidney Injury. A Randomized Trial With Bioimpedance Analysis.
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard saline infusion

All patients received standard intravenous saline hydration (0.9% sodium chloride, 1 ml/kg/h for 12 hours before and after procedure)

Drug: sodium chloride infusion

Experimental: Double saline infusion

All patients received double dose of intravenous saline hydration (0.9% sodium chloride, 2 ml/kg/h for 12 hours before and after procedure)

Drug: sodium chloride infusion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury [1 day]

    contrast acute kidney injury is defined as an increase in serum Cystatin C concentration 10% above the baseline value at 24 hours after administration of contrast medium

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Adverse clinical events [1 month]

    adverse clinical events within 1 month including in-hospital death and need for dialysis or hemofiltration

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury [2 days]

    Contrast-induced acute kidney injury defined as an increase in serum creatinine >= 0.3 mg/dl over baseline value within 2 days after the administration of contrast medium

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • consecutive patients admitted in Cardiology Unit for coronary or peripheral angiography with "lower fluid status" defined on the basis bio-impedance analysis (Male with resistance/height ratio > 315 Ohm/meter and Female > 380 Ohm/meter).
Exclusion Criteria:
  • contrast medium administration within the 10 days

  • end stage renal failure requiring dialysis

  • refused to give informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ospedale Santo Stefano Prato Italy 59100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Ospedale Misericordia e Dolce

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mauro Maioli, MD, Ospedale S. Stefano - Prato - Italy

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Mauro Maioli, MD, Ospedale Misericordia e Dolce
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02225431
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Prato0706
  • 2013/1
First Posted:
Aug 26, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Oct 16, 2015
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2015
Keywords provided by Mauro Maioli, MD, Ospedale Misericordia e Dolce
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 16, 2015