Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Two Asparaginase Preparations in Children With Previously Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Sponsor
medac GmbH (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00784017
Collaborator
(none)
199
1
2
48
4.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This multicentric phase III study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of recombinant asparaginase (rASNase) in comparison to Asparaginase medac™ during treatment of children with de novo ALL

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
199 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Two Asparaginase Preparations in Children With Previously Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: asparaginase medac

Drug: asparaginase
5.000U /m²; IV; day 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33

Experimental: recombinant asparaginase

Drug: recombinant asparaginase
5.000U /m²; IV; day 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. To determine the rate of patients with complete asparagine (ASN) depletion in serum during induction treatment and to demonstrate non-inferiority of rASNase compared to Asparaginase medac™ with respect to this parameter [March 2012]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. To assess the incidence of patients with hypersensitivity reactions to the first dose of ASNase in the post-induction treatment [March 2012]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
1 Year to 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Previously untreated T-lineage or precursor B-lineage ALL

  • Patients must have morphological proof of ALL and diagnosis must be made from bone marrow morphology with more than 25% blasts

  • Written informed consent

  • Treatment according to DCOG ALL 10 protocol

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Mature B-lineage ALL

  • Patients with secondary ALL

  • Known allergy to any ASNase preparation

  • General health status according to Karnofsky / Lansky score < 40%

  • Pre-existing known coagulopathy (e.g. haemophilia)

  • Pre-existing pancreatitis

  • Liver insufficiency (Bilirubin > 50 µmol/L; SGOT/SGPT > 10 x ULN)

  • Other current malignancies

  • Pregnancy (planned or existent), breast feeding

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands NL-3015

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • medac GmbH

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
medac GmbH
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00784017
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MC-ASP.5/ALL
  • EudraCT number 2006-003180-31
First Posted:
Nov 2, 2008
Last Update Posted:
Feb 27, 2013
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2013

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 27, 2013