Single vs Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplants in Children With High Risk Leukemia and Myelodysplasia (BMT CTN 0501)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center, prospective study of single umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation versus double UCB transplantation in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND:
In nearly every large single center or registry analysis of outcomes after UCB transplantation, cell dose is identified as an important factor influencing the incidence and rate of hematopoietic recovery, risk of transplant-related mortality, and probability of survival. Pilot data suggest that infusion of two partially human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched UCB units, which always augments the graft cell dose, is safe and may improve neutrophil recovery and survival. To determine whether the infusion of two UCB units enhances survival, a multi-center, open-label, randomized trial is proposed. As adequate single UCB units can be identified for more than 80% of pediatric recipients (in contrast to less than 30% for adults), this study will be open only to pediatric patients. The population will be restricted to patients with high-risk hematologic malignancy, the most common indication of UCB transplantation in children.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Participants will include patients 1 to 21 years of age with a diagnosis of hematological malignancy and with two partially HLA-matched UCB units. Units must be HLA-matched at 3 of 6 HLA-A and B (intermediate resolution molecular typing) and DRB1 (high resolution molecular typing) with each other and 4 of 6 with the recipient. Two appropriately HLA-matched units must be available such that one unit delivers a pre-cryopreserved, nucleated cell dose of at least 2.5 x 107 per kilogram and the second unit delivers at least 1.5 x 107 per kilogram.
Patients will be randomized no more than 14 days prior to initiation of conditioning. UCB units will be shipped prior to initiation of conditioning.
The preparative regimen will consist of the following:
-
Fludarabine: 25 mg/m2/day IV on Days -10, -9, and -8.
-
Total Body Irradiation (TBI): 165 cGy twice daily on Days -7, -6, -5, and -4.
-
Cyclophosphamide: 60 mg/kg/day x 2 on Days -3 and -2.
-
Day 0 will be the day of the UCB transplant. The Graft-vs-Host-Disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen will be mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg IV BID on Day -3 to Day
- 45 and cyclosporine A (CSA) to maintain level 200-400 ng/mL beginning on Day -3.
Patients will be followed for at least 24 months post-transplant.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Single Cord Blood Transplant Unrelated donor, single umbilical cord blood unit transplant; conditioning regimen: Total Body Irradiation/cyclophosphamide/fludarabine; GVHD prophylaxis: Cyclosporine A/Mycophenolate Mofetil |
Biological: Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplant
Unrelated donor, single umbilical cord blood unit; conditioning regimen: TBI/cyclophosphamide/fludarabine; GVHD prophylaxis: cyclosporine/MMF
Radiation: Total Body Irradiation
The TBI will be delivered from either a linear accelerator or cobalt source at a dose rate of between 4 and 26 cGy/minute using energies of between 1 and 25 MV.
Other Names:
Drug: Cyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/day will be administered as a 2 hour intravenous infusion with a high volume fluid flush on Days -3 and -2.
Other Names:
Drug: Fludarabine
Fludarabine 25 mg/m2/day will be administered over 30-60 minutes intravenous infusion on Days -10 through -8. Fludarabine will not be dose adjusted for body weight.
Other Names:
Drug: Cyclosporine A
CSA will be administered beginning on Day -3 and doses will be adjusted to maintain a level of 200-400 ng/mL by TDX method (or 100-250 ng/mL by Tandem MS or equivalent level for other CSA testing methods). CSA can be administered per institutional practice.
Other Names:
Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil
MMF will be given at a dose of 1 gram IV q 8 hours if > 50 kg or 15 mg/kg IV q 8 hours if < 50 kg beginning the morning of Day -3.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Double Cord Blood Transplant Unrelated donor, double umbilical cord blood unit transplant; Conditioning regimen: Total Body Irradiation/cyclophosphamide/fludarabine; GVHD prophylaxis: Cyclosporine A/Mycophenolate Mofetil |
Biological: Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplant
Unrelated donor, double umbilical cord blood unit; Conditioning regimen: TBI/cyclophosphamide/fludarabine; GVHD prophylaxis: cyclosporine/MMF
Radiation: Total Body Irradiation
The TBI will be delivered from either a linear accelerator or cobalt source at a dose rate of between 4 and 26 cGy/minute using energies of between 1 and 25 MV.
Other Names:
Drug: Cyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/day will be administered as a 2 hour intravenous infusion with a high volume fluid flush on Days -3 and -2.
Other Names:
Drug: Fludarabine
Fludarabine 25 mg/m2/day will be administered over 30-60 minutes intravenous infusion on Days -10 through -8. Fludarabine will not be dose adjusted for body weight.
Other Names:
Drug: Cyclosporine A
CSA will be administered beginning on Day -3 and doses will be adjusted to maintain a level of 200-400 ng/mL by TDX method (or 100-250 ng/mL by Tandem MS or equivalent level for other CSA testing methods). CSA can be administered per institutional practice.
Other Names:
Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil
MMF will be given at a dose of 1 gram IV q 8 hours if > 50 kg or 15 mg/kg IV q 8 hours if < 50 kg beginning the morning of Day -3.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival [1 year post-randomization]
Overall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival [1 year post-randomization]
Disease-free survival is defined as survival without relapse of the primary disease.
- Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment [Days 42 and 100]
Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than 500x10^6/liter for three consecutive measurements on different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil engraftment. Platelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 50,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days.
- Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment [2 years post-transplant]
Platelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 50,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days.
- Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) [Day 100 post-randomization]
Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995: Skin stage: 0: No rash Rash <25% of body surface area Rash on 25-50% of body surface area Rash on > 50% of body surface area Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*: 0: <2 mg/dL 2-3 mg/dL 3.01-6 mg/dL 6.01-15.0 mg/dL >15 mg/dL GI stage*: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day Diarrhea >1500 mL/day Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus * If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1. GVHD grade: 0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4
- Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD [1 year post-randomization]
Incidences of chronic GVHD will be graded per Shulman et al. 1980. This reference categorizes chronic GVHD as either limited or extensive. For this outcome, participants developing either type are considered to have a chronic GVHD event.
- Number of Infections Per Participant [2 years post-randomization]
- Percentage of Participants With Relapse [1 year post-randomization]
Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of AML, ALL, CML, or MDS consistent with pre-transplant features. Testing for recurrent malignancy in the blood, marrow or other sites will be used to assess relapse after transplantation.
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality [1 year post-randomization]
Treatment related mortality is defined as death without relapse of the primary disease.
- Number of Participants With Engraftment Syndrome [Day 100 post-transplant]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Two partially HLA-matched UCB units. Units must be HLA-matched minimally at 4 of 6 HLA-A and B (at intermediate resolution by molecular typing) and DRB1 (at high resolution by molecular typing) loci with the patient, and the units must be HLA-matched at 3 of 6 HLA- A, B, DRB1 loci with each other (using same resolution of molecular typing as indicated above). Two appropriately HLA-matched units must be available such that one unit delivers a pre-cryopreserved nucleated cell dose of at least 2.5 x 107 per kilogram and the second unit at least 1.5 x 107 per kilogram.
-
Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) at the following stages:
- High risk first complete remission (CR1), defined as the following:
-
Having preceding myelodysplasia (MDS)
-
High risk cytogenetics (high risk cytogenetics: del (5q) -5, -7, abn (3q), t (6;9) complex karyotype [at least 5 abnormalities],)the presence of a high FLT3 ITD-AR (> 0.4)
-
Requiring more than 1 cycle of chemotherapy to obtain complete remission (CR);
-
FAB M6
-
Second or greater CR
-
First relapse with less than 25% blasts in bone marrow
-
Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery
-
Therapy-related AML for which prior malignancy has been in remission for at least 12 months
-
Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) at the following stages:
- High risk first remission, defined as one of the following conditions:
-
Philadelphia chromosome-positive adult lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL)
-
Mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) rearrangement with slow early response (defined as having M2 [5-25% blasts] or M3 [more than 25% blasts on bone marrow examination on Day 14 of induction therapy])
-
Hypodiploidy (less than 44 chromosomes or DNA index less than 0.81)
-
End of induction M3 bone marrow
-
End of induction M2 with M2-3 at Day 42
-
Evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD). If a patient's only high risk criterion is MRD, approval by a protocol chair or protocol officer is required for enrollment. For COG centers, this will only be for MRD greater than 1 percent by flow MRD at the end of extended induction.
- High risk second remission, defined as one of the following conditions:
-
Philadelphia chromosome-positive adult lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL)
-
Bone marrow relapse less than 36 months from induction
-
T-lineage relapse at any time
-
Very early isolated central nervous system (CNS) relapse (6 months from diagnosis)
-
Slow reinduction (M2-3 at Day 28) after relapse at any time
-
Evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD). If a patient's only high risk criterion is MRD, approval by a protocol chair or protocol officer is required for enrollment. For COG centers, this will only be for MRD greater than 1 percent by flow MRD at the end of extended induction.
- Any third or subsequent CR
-
NK cell lymphoblastic leukemia in any CR
-
Biphenotypic or undifferentiated leukemia in any CR or if in first relapse must have less than 25% blasts in bone marrow (BM)
-
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at any stage
-
Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic or accelerated phase
-
All patients with evidence of CNS leukemia must be treated and be in CNS CR to be eligible for study.
-
Patients 16 years old or older must have a Karnofsky score of at least 70% and patients younger than 16 years old must have a Lansky score of at least 70%.
-
Patients with adequate physical function as measured by:
-
Cardiac: Left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40% or shortening fraction greater than 26%
-
Hepatic: Bilirubin no more than 2.5 mg/dL; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) no more than 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
-
Renal: Serum creatinine within normal range for age, or if serum creatinine is outside normal range for age, then renal function (creatinine clearance or GFR) greater than 70 mL/min/1.73 m^2
-
Pulmonary: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), or forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than 50% of predicted value (corrected for hemoglobin); if unable to perform pulmonary function tests, then O2 saturation greater than 92% of room air
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Pregnant (β-positive human chorionic gonadotropin [HCG]) or breastfeeding
-
Evidence of HIV infection or HIV positive serology
-
Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infection (currently taking medication and progression of clinical symptoms)
-
Autologous transplant less than 12 months prior to enrollment
-
Prior autologous transplant for the disease for which the UCB transplant will be performed
-
Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
-
Active malignancy other than the one for which the UCB transplant is being performed within 12 months of enrollment
-
Inability to receive TBI
-
Requirement of supplemental oxygen
-
HLA-matched related donor able to donate
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Alabama | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | 35294 |
2 | Phoenix Children's Hospital | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 85016 |
3 | City of Hope National Medical Center | Duarte | California | United States | 91010 |
4 | Childrens Hospital at Oakland | Oakland | California | United States | 94609 |
5 | UCSD/Rady Childrens Hospital | San Diego | California | United States | 92123 |
6 | University of California, San Francisco (Peds) | San Francisco | California | United States | 94143 |
7 | The Children's Hospital of Denver | Denver | Colorado | United States | 80218 |
8 | Children's National Medical Center | Washington | District of Columbia | United States | 20010 |
9 | University of Florida College of Medicine (Shands) | Gainesville | Florida | United States | 32610 |
10 | Nemours Childrens Clinic | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32207 |
11 | University of Miami | Miami | Florida | United States | 33136 |
12 | All Children's Hospital | Saint Petersburg | Florida | United States | 33710 |
13 | Children's Healthcare of Atlanta | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30322-1062 |
14 | Indiana University Medical Center | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46202 |
15 | University of Louisville/Kosiar Children's Hospital | Louisville | Kentucky | United States | 40202 |
16 | Children's of New Orleans | New Orleans | Louisiana | United States | 70118 |
17 | DFCI/Children's Hospital of Boston | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02115 |
18 | University of Michigan Medical Center | Ann Arbor | Michigan | United States | 48109 |
19 | Karmanos Cancer Institute/Children's Hospital of Michigan | Detroit | Michigan | United States | 48201 |
20 | University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55455 |
21 | University of Mississippi | Jackson | Mississippi | United States | 39216 |
22 | Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Kansas City | Missouri | United States | 64108 |
23 | New York Medical College | Valhalla | New York | United States | 10595 |
24 | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | United States | 27705 |
25 | Nationwide Children's Hospital | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 43205-2696 |
26 | Oregon Health Sciences University | Portland | Oregon | United States | 97239 |
27 | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19104 |
28 | Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | United States | 29425 |
29 | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37232-7610 |
30 | Children's Medical Center of Dallas | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75235 |
31 | Cook Childrens Medical Center | Fort Worth | Texas | United States | 76104 |
32 | Texas Transplant Institute | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
33 | Utah BMT/University of Utah Medical School | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84132 |
34 | Virgina Commonwealth University | Richmond | Virginia | United States | 23298 |
35 | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98109 |
36 | Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States | 53211 |
37 | Children's Hospital at Westmead | Westmead | New South Wales | Australia | 2145 |
38 | BC Cancer Agency | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada | V5Z 4E3 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- National Marrow Donor Program
Investigators
- Study Director: Mary Horowitz, MD, MS, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- BMTCTN0501
- 2U01HL069294
- 5U24CA076518
- NCT00429598
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Cord Blood Unit Transplantation: Unrelated donor, single cord blood unit | Double Cord Blood Unit Transplantation: Unrelated donor, double cord blood unit |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 113 | 111 |
COMPLETED | 112 | 108 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 113 | 111 | 224 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
10.4
(5.1)
|
10.4
(5.1)
|
10.4
(5.1)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
55
48.7%
|
41
36.9%
|
96
42.9%
|
Male |
58
51.3%
|
70
63.1%
|
128
57.1%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
22
19.5%
|
20
18%
|
42
18.8%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
88
77.9%
|
88
79.3%
|
176
78.6%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
3
2.7%
|
3
2.7%
|
6
2.7%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
0.9%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
Asian |
4
3.5%
|
5
4.5%
|
9
4%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
13
11.5%
|
11
9.9%
|
24
10.7%
|
White |
80
70.8%
|
85
76.6%
|
165
73.7%
|
More than one race |
3
2.7%
|
3
2.7%
|
6
2.7%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
12
10.6%
|
7
6.3%
|
19
8.5%
|
Primary Disease (Count of Participants) | |||
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) |
39
34.5%
|
38
34.2%
|
77
34.4%
|
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) |
61
54%
|
58
52.3%
|
119
53.1%
|
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia |
6
5.3%
|
2
1.8%
|
8
3.6%
|
Acute Undifferentiated Leukemia |
1
0.9%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) |
5
4.4%
|
13
11.7%
|
18
8%
|
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) |
1
0.9%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
AML Disease Status (Count of Participants) | |||
First Complete Remission (CR) |
17
15%
|
14
12.6%
|
31
13.8%
|
Second or Later CR |
16
14.2%
|
19
17.1%
|
35
15.6%
|
First Relapse |
1
0.9%
|
3
2.7%
|
4
1.8%
|
Morphologic CR before Complete-Blood-Count Recover |
2
1.8%
|
2
1.8%
|
4
1.8%
|
Secondary or Therapy-related |
3
2.7%
|
0
0%
|
3
1.3%
|
ALL Disease Status (Count of Participants) | |||
First Complete Remission (CR) |
19
16.8%
|
19
17.1%
|
38
17%
|
Second CR |
29
25.7%
|
28
25.2%
|
57
25.4%
|
Subsequent CR |
13
11.5%
|
10
9%
|
23
10.3%
|
Morphologic CR before Complete-Blood-Count Recover |
0
0%
|
1
0.9%
|
1
0.4%
|
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia Disease Status (Count of Participants) | |||
First Complete Remission (CR) |
5
4.4%
|
1
0.9%
|
6
2.7%
|
Second CR |
1
0.9%
|
1
0.9%
|
2
0.9%
|
MDS Disease Status (Count of Participants) | |||
Refractory Anemia |
2
1.8%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.9%
|
Refractory Cytopenia with Multilineage Dysplasia |
2
1.8%
|
3
2.7%
|
5
2.2%
|
Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts 1 (RAEB1) |
0
0%
|
3
2.7%
|
3
1.3%
|
Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts 2 (RAEB2) |
0
0%
|
4
3.6%
|
4
1.8%
|
Unclassified |
1
0.9%
|
3
2.7%
|
4
1.8%
|
Karnofsky Performance Score (Count of Participants) | |||
100% |
58
51.3%
|
57
51.4%
|
115
51.3%
|
90% |
38
33.6%
|
43
38.7%
|
81
36.2%
|
80% |
13
11.5%
|
9
8.1%
|
22
9.8%
|
70% |
4
3.5%
|
2
1.8%
|
6
2.7%
|
Recipient CMV Status (Count of Participants) | |||
Positive |
58
51.3%
|
66
59.5%
|
124
55.4%
|
Negative |
51
45.1%
|
39
35.1%
|
90
40.2%
|
Inconclusive |
1
0.9%
|
1
0.9%
|
2
0.9%
|
Unknown |
3
2.7%
|
5
4.5%
|
8
3.6%
|
Weight at Infusion (kilograms) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kilograms] |
39.6
(20.2)
|
38.7
(19.2)
|
39.15
(19.7)
|
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit HLA Match (Count of Participants) | |||
3/6 |
1
0.9%
|
2
1.8%
|
3
1.3%
|
4/6 |
44
38.9%
|
33
29.7%
|
77
34.4%
|
5/6 |
51
45.1%
|
59
53.2%
|
110
49.1%
|
6/6 |
16
14.2%
|
14
12.6%
|
30
13.4%
|
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit HLA Match (Count of Participants) | |||
3/6 |
1
0.9%
|
1
0.9%
|
|
4/6 |
43
38.1%
|
43
38.7%
|
|
5/6 |
43
38.1%
|
43
38.7%
|
|
6/6 |
21
18.6%
|
21
18.9%
|
|
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit ABO Match (Count of Participants) | |||
Major Mismatch |
30
26.5%
|
25
22.5%
|
55
24.6%
|
Minor Mismatch |
24
21.2%
|
35
31.5%
|
59
26.3%
|
Bidirectional Mismatch |
10
8.8%
|
8
7.2%
|
18
8%
|
No Mismatch |
44
38.9%
|
36
32.4%
|
80
35.7%
|
Unknown |
4
3.5%
|
4
3.6%
|
8
3.6%
|
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit ABO Match (Count of Participants) | |||
Major mismatch |
31
27.4%
|
31
27.9%
|
|
Minor mismatch |
29
25.7%
|
29
26.1%
|
|
Bidirectional mismatch |
4
3.5%
|
4
3.6%
|
|
No mismatch |
38
33.6%
|
38
34.2%
|
|
Unknown |
6
5.3%
|
6
5.4%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival |
---|---|
Description | Overall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause. |
Time Frame | 1 year post-randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 113 | 111 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
73
64.6%
|
65
58.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in overall survival at one year post-randomization between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. The targeted sample size of 110 participants per treatment group was sufficient to maintain a type I error rate of 5% and provide more than 86% power to detect an increase in overall survival from 57% among participants receiving a single unit graft to 77% for those receiving a double-unit graft. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.17 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival |
---|---|
Description | Disease-free survival is defined as survival without relapse of the primary disease. |
Time Frame | 1 year post-randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 113 | 111 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
70
61.9%
|
64
57.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in disease-free survival at one year post-randomization between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.11 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment |
---|---|
Description | Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than 500x10^6/liter for three consecutive measurements on different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil engraftment. Platelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 50,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days. |
Time Frame | Days 42 and 100 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Transplanted participants |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 112 | 108 |
Neutrophil Engraftment at Day 42 |
89
78.8%
|
88
79.3%
|
Platelet Engraftment at Day 100 |
76
67.3%
|
65
58.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.29 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Gray's test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.04 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Gray's test | |
Comments |
Title | Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment |
---|---|
Description | Platelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 50,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days. |
Time Frame | 2 years post-transplant |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Transplanted participants |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 112 | 108 |
Neutrophil Engraftment |
21
|
23
|
Platelet Engraftment |
58
|
84
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) |
---|---|
Description | Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995: Skin stage: 0: No rash Rash <25% of body surface area Rash on 25-50% of body surface area Rash on > 50% of body surface area Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*: 0: <2 mg/dL 2-3 mg/dL 3.01-6 mg/dL 6.01-15.0 mg/dL >15 mg/dL GI stage*: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day Diarrhea >1500 mL/day Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus * If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1. GVHD grade: 0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4 |
Time Frame | Day 100 post-randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Transplanted participants |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 112 | 108 |
Acute GVHD Grade II-IV |
57
50.4%
|
56
50.5%
|
Acute GVHD Grade III-IV |
13
11.5%
|
23
20.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of Grade II-IV acute GVHD between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.78 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Gray's test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of Grade III-IV acute GVHD between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.02 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Gray's test | |
Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD |
---|---|
Description | Incidences of chronic GVHD will be graded per Shulman et al. 1980. This reference categorizes chronic GVHD as either limited or extensive. For this outcome, participants developing either type are considered to have a chronic GVHD event. |
Time Frame | 1 year post-randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Transplanted participants |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 112 | 108 |
Chronic GVHD |
30
26.5%
|
32
28.8%
|
Extensive Chronic GVHD |
9
8%
|
15
13.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.51 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Gray's test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.05 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Gray's test | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Infections Per Participant |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 2 years post-randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Transplanted participants |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 112 | 108 |
0 |
10
8.8%
|
9
8.1%
|
1 |
15
13.3%
|
13
11.7%
|
2 |
12
10.6%
|
15
13.5%
|
3 |
19
16.8%
|
10
9%
|
4 |
17
15%
|
15
13.5%
|
5 |
7
6.2%
|
12
10.8%
|
6-10 |
19
16.8%
|
24
21.6%
|
More than 10 |
13
11.5%
|
10
9%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Relapse |
---|---|
Description | Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of AML, ALL, CML, or MDS consistent with pre-transplant features. Testing for recurrent malignancy in the blood, marrow or other sites will be used to assess relapse after transplantation. |
Time Frame | 1 year post-randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Transplanted participants |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 112 | 108 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
12
10.6%
|
14
12.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.12 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Gray's test | |
Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality |
---|---|
Description | Treatment related mortality is defined as death without relapse of the primary disease. |
Time Frame | 1 year post-randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Transplanted participants |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 112 | 108 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
19
16.8%
|
22
19.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Single UCB Transplant, Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.43 |
Comments | Testing was performed at a significance level of 0.05 | |
Method | Gray's test | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Participants With Engraftment Syndrome |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Day 100 post-transplant |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Transplanted participants |
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation |
Measure Participants | 112 | 108 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
11
9.7%
|
7
6.3%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 2 years post-transplant | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Serious Adverse Events (AE) are defined as events associated with death, life-threatening event, disability, congenital anomaly, required intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage, hospitalization or other serious adverse event. Only unexpected grades 3-5 adverse events were required to be reported through the AE system per protocol. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant | ||
Arm/Group Description | Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 5/112 (4.5%) | 14/108 (13%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Hemolytic anemia | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 2/108 (1.9%) | 2 |
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Congestive heart failure | 1/112 (0.9%) | 1 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Pneumonia | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Septic shock | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Hyperglycemia | 2/112 (1.8%) | 2 | 0/108 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Acute intracranial Hemorrage | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Seizure/aspiration Pneumonia | 1/112 (0.9%) | 1 | 0/108 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Hypoxia | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 2/108 (1.9%) | 2 |
Pulmonary Hemorrage | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Aspiration | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Aspiration Pneumonia | 1/112 (0.9%) | 1 | 0/108 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypotension | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Hypertension | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Hematoma | 0/112 (0%) | 0 | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Single UCB Transplant | Double UCB Transplant | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/112 (0%) | 0/108 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Adam Mendizabal |
---|---|
Organization | The EMMES Corporation |
Phone | 301-251-1161 |
amendizabal@EMMES.com |
- BMTCTN0501
- 2U01HL069294
- 5U24CA076518
- NCT00429598