Selecting a Favorable KIR Donor in Unrelated HCT for AML

Sponsor
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01288222
Collaborator
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH)
506
19
1
106
26.6
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Donors with favorable KIR B haplotype gene content have yielded reduced relapse risk and improved leukemia free survival (LFS) in retrospective analyses of unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Specifically, donors with more KIR B gene content and those who are homozygous for the centromeric (Cen) B haplotype genes (as opposed to the telomeric (Tel) genes confer the most protective effect. This study proposes to prospectively test and validate the utility and effectiveness of further informing URD identification and selection by KIR genotyping as a supplement to HLA matching and the other variables known or suspected to indicate the best URD for a patient.

Hypotheses:
  1. Favorable KIR donors will improve protection against relapse and improve leukemia free survival (LFS) after URD HCT for AML.

  2. Directed study procedures for rapid KIR genotyping and reporting to searching Transplant Centers (TC) can inform donor search and selection without delay in donor availability for HCT.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: KIR genotype
N/A

Detailed Description

Transplant Centers will select the best HLA matched, and as appropriate, preferred KIR donor.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
506 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
KIR Genotyping for Unrelated Donor (URD) Selection Prior to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for AML: Selecting a Favorable KIR Donor
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Unrelated Donor Transplant Patients

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia who have received KIR genotype from an unrelated donor transplant.

Other: KIR genotype
KIR genotype data from unrelated donor are collected

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of Relapse [2 Years]

    To measure the impact of donor selection for KIR genotype in allogeneic URD HCT for AML on cumulative incidence of relapse. We will determine a quantitative estimate of the likelihood of better KIR donors identified with routine, non-directed donor selection along with KIR genotyping data. The observed incidence of success in a better KIR donor identified within 8 weeks will be compared to the original donor genotype expected frequencies identified in our retrospective genotyping of 1086 donors selected for AML transplants.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of Relapse-Free Survival [2 Years]

  2. Overall Survival [2 Years]

  3. Incidence of Engraftment [2 Years]

  4. Incidence of Graft Versus Host Disease [2 Years]

  5. Incidence of Transplant Related Mortality [2 Years]

    Number of patients who died within 2 years of transplant.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing screening for potential URD HCT

  • Potential URD undergoing screening to provide a HCT graft to a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at a participating institution

  • Provides written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Transplant Centers will select the best HLA matched, and as appropriate, preferred KIR donor. In situations where the preferred (best > better > neutral) KIR donor is not selected in favor of a less favorable KIR genotype donor, the center will report one or more defined reasons (donor age; gender; parity; CMV status; ABO status; availability/logistics; other) for the choice (among equivalently HLA matched donors).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale Scottsdale Arizona United States 85259
2 Colorado Blood Cancer Institute Denver Colorado United States 80218
3 Emory University Atlanta Georgia United States 30322
4 University of Chicago Medical Center Cancer Center Chicago Illinois United States 60637
5 Indiana University Simon Cancer Center Indianapolis Indiana United States 46202
6 Kansas University Cancer Center Kansas City Kansas United States 66160
7 Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55455
8 Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Rochester Minnesota United States 55905
9 Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110
10 Hackensack University Medical Center Hackensack New Jersey United States 07601
11 Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo New York United States 14263
12 New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center New York New York United States 10021
13 Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio United States 44195
14 Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus Ohio United States 43210
15 University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19104
16 Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Dallas Texas United States 75246
17 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas United States 77030
18 Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio San Antonio Texas United States 78229
19 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington United States 98109

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Weisdorf, M.D., Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01288222
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2010LSUC043
  • MT2010-06
  • P01CA111412
First Posted:
Feb 2, 2011
Last Update Posted:
Mar 11, 2021
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 11, 2021