Clinical Phase III Trial Treosulfan-based Conditioning Versus Reduced-intensity Conditioning (RIC)

Sponsor
medac GmbH (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00822393
Collaborator
(none)
570
33
2
110
17.3
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This randomized allogeneic transplantation protocol compares i.v. Treosulfan-based conditioning therapy with reduced intensity i.v. Busulfan-based conditioning in adult AML and MDS patients at increased risk for standard conditioning therapies. The protocol is based on results of previous phase I/II trials evaluating Treosulfan/Fludarabine conditioning prior to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The reference arm (reduced intensity i.v. Busulfan/Fludarabine) is considered to be accepted medical practice for the study patient population.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

To compare efficacy and safety of Treosulfan-based conditioning (test) with i.v. Busulfan-based reduced intensity conditioning (reference).

The statistical aim of the study is to show non-inferiority with respect to:

Event-free survival (EFS) within 2 years after transplantation. Events are defined as relapse of disease, graft failure or death (whatever occurs first).

  1. Comparative evaluation of incidence of CTC grade III/IV mucositis/stomatitis between day -6 and day +28

  2. Comparative evaluation of overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) as well as non-relapse mortality (NRM) and transplantation-related mortality (TRM)within 2 years after transplantation

  3. Comparative evaluation of day +28 conditional cumulative incidence of engraftment

  4. Comparative evaluation of day +28 and day +100 incidence of complete donor-type chimerism

  5. Comparative evaluation of cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GvHD within 2 years after transplantation

  6. Comparative evaluation of incidence of other CTC grade III/IV adverse events between day -6 and day +28

Individual patients will be followed-up for at most 2 years after transplantation. Three confirmatory interim evaluations and one final analysis are planned, which allow to stop the trial as soon as the question of non-inferiority is answered (as outlined below). In addition, post-surveillance with respect to OS and EFS will be conducted one year after transplantation of the last randomised patient.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
570 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Clinical Phase III Trial to Compare Treosulfan-based Conditioning Therapy With Busulfan-based Reduced-intensity Conditioning (RIC) Prior to Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With AML or MDS Considered Ineligible to Standard Conditioning Regimens
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 24, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 25, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 25, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 1

Busulfan

Drug: Busulfan
4 x 0.8 mg/kg/d Intravenous Day -4 and -3

Experimental: 2

Treosulfan

Drug: Treosulfan
10 g/m2/d Intravenous Day -4, -3, -2

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Event-free survival (EFS) [within 2 years after transplantation]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Comparative evaluation of incidence of CTC grade III/IV mucositis/stomatitis between day -6 and day +28 [between day -6 and day +28]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia acc. to WHO, 2008 (AML in complete remission at transplant, i.e. blast counts < 5 % in bone marrow) or myelodysplastic syndrome acc. to WHO, 2008 (MDS with blast counts < 20 % in bone marrow during disease history) indicated for allogeneic haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation but considered to be at increased risk for standard conditioning therapies according to the following criteria:
  • patients aged ≥ 50 years at transplant and / or

  • patients with a HCT-CI score > 2 [acc. to Sorror et al., 2005]

  1. Availability of an HLA-identical sibling donor (MRD) or HLA-identical unrelated donor (MUD). Donor selection is based on molecular high resolution typing (4 digits) of class II alleles of the DRB1 and DQB1 gene loci and molecular (at least) low resolution typing (2 digits) of class I alleles (i.e., antigens) of the HLA- A, B, and C gene loci. In case, no class I and class II completely identical donor (10 out of 10 gene loci) can be identified, one antigen disparity (class I) and/or one allele disparity (class II) between patient and donor are acceptable. Conversely, disparity of two antigens (irrespective of the involved gene loci) cannot be accepted. These definitions for the required degree of histocompatibility apply to the selection of related as well as of unrelated donors.

  2. Adult patients of both gender, age 18 - 70 years

  3. Karnofsky Index ≥ 60 %

  4. Written informed consent

  5. Men capable of reproduction and women of childbearing potential must be willing to consent to using a highly effective method of birth control such as condoms, implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, IUDs, sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner while on treatment and for at least 6 months thereafter

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12) and in CR1

  2. Patients considered contra-indicated for allogeneic HSCT due to severe concomitant illness (within three weeks prior to scheduled day -6):

  • patients with severe renal impairment like patients on dialysis or prior renal transplantation or S-creatinine > 3.0 x ULN or calculated creatinine-clearance < 60 ml/min

  • patients with severe pulmonary impairment, DLCOsb (Hb-adjusted)/or FEV1 < 50 % or severe dyspnoea at rest or requiring oxygen supply

  • patients with severe cardiac impairment diagnosed by echocardiography and LVEF < 40 %

  • patients with severe hepatic impairment indicated by hyperbilirubinaemia > 3 x ULN or ALT / AST > 5 x ULN

  1. Active malignant involvement of the CNS

  2. HIV-positivity, active non-controlled infectious disease under treatment (no decrease of CRP or PCT) including active viral liver infection

  3. Previous allogeneic HSCT

  4. Pleural effusion or ascites > 1.0 L

  5. Pregnancy or lactation

  6. Known hypersensitivity to treosulfan, busulfan and/or related ingredients

  7. Participation in another experimental drug trial within 4 weeks prior to day -6 of the protocol

  8. Non-cooperative behaviour or non-compliance

  9. Psychiatric diseases or conditions that might compromise the ability to give informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Helsinki University Central Hospital, Dept. of Medicine Helsinki Finland 00290
2 Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud Lyon France 69495
3 Hopital Saint-Louis Paris France 75475
4 Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Med. Klinik I Dresden Germany 01307
5 Klinik für Knochenmarktransplantation Essen Germany 45122
6 Malteser Krankenhaus St. Franziskus-Hospital Flensburg Germany 24939
7 Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Freiburg Germany 79106
8 Universitätsmedizin Goettingen, Haematolgie und Onkologie Göttingen Germany 37075
9 Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH Hamburg Germany 20099
10 Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany 69120
11 Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena Jena Germany 07747
12 Universitätsklinikum Koeln, Stammzelltransplantation Koeln Germany 50937
13 Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Haematologie, internistische Onkologie Leipzig Germany 04109
14 Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, III. Medizinische Klinik Mainz Germany 55131
15 Klinikum Rechts der Isar der TU München, III. Med. Klinik Muenchen Germany 81675
16 Universitätsklinikum Münster Münster Germany 48129
17 Klinikum Nürnberg, 5. Medizinische Klinik Nürnberg Germany 90419
18 Klinikum Oldenburg gGmbH Oldenburg Germany 26133
19 Klinikum der Universität Regensburg Regensburg Germany 93053
20 Universität Rostock Rostock Germany 18057
21 Universität Tübingen Tübingen Germany 72076
22 Stiftung Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik Wiesbaden Germany 65191
23 Klinikum der Universität Würzburg Würzburg Germany 97070
24 St. Istvan and St. Laszlo Hospital of Budapest Budapest Hungary 1097
25 Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo Italy 24127
26 Hematology University of Brescia Brescia Italy 1-25123
27 Scientific Institute H. San Raffaele Milan Italy 20132
28 Ospedale Civile Pescara Pescara Italy 65123
29 Policlinico Umberto I Univ. La Sapienza Rome Italy 00161
30 Clinica Ematologica ed Unita di Terapie Cellulari 'Carlo Melzi' Udine Italy 33100
31 Policlinico GB Rossi (Borgo Roma), Div. di Ematologia Verona Italy 37134
32 Medical University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland 80-952
33 Silesian Medical University Katowice Poland 40-032

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • medac GmbH

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dietrich W. Beelen, MD, University Hospital, Essen

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
medac GmbH
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00822393
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MC-FludT.14/L
  • EudraCT-No.: 2008-002356-18
First Posted:
Jan 14, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Jul 30, 2020
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Keywords provided by medac GmbH
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 30, 2020