ALLO-BEST: A Study Comparing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Versus Best Available Standard of Care Therapy in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04822766
Collaborator
(none)
172
1
2
24
7.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A subject of major interest for researchers, clinicians, patients, and payers, is the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the treatment of these older patients with AML. With conventional induction chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents, the expected 2-year overall survival (OS) is less than 25% in patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease. The 2-year OS ranges from 50 to 56% with allo-HSCT in AML patients older than 65 years.

Performing an allo-HSCT in older patients is however still controversial because of the higher risk of non-relapse mortality (15 to 35%) and graft-versus-host disease. Depending on the center policy, patients older than 65 years will either be contraindicated for transplant or will receive allo-HSCT.

With a phase III comparative, randomized, controlled, prospective, multicenter study, the trial aim to assess prospectively the outcomes and quality of life of older patients with AML receiving allo-HSCT strategy compared to those receiving a non-transplant approach.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Drug: Best chemotherapy treatment
N/A

Detailed Description

Every year, 30,000 patients in Europe and 20,000 in the USA are diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). More than half of them are over 65 years old. In this older population, the median overall survival (OS) is only 2 to 8 months. With conventional induction chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents, the expected 2-year OS is less than 25% in patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease.

Performing an allo-HSCT in older patients is however still controversial because of the higher risk of non-relapse mortality (15 to 35%) and graft-versus-host disease. Depending on the center policy, patients older than 65 years will either be contraindicated for transplant or will receive allo-HSCT. Noteworthy, no prospective randomized trial has yet compared allo-HSCT to a non-transplant strategy in older patients with AML. A previous attempt made 10 years ago, by the EBMT to run a slightly similar trial, has failed in France and most European countries, mainly (i) because it mandated the type of transplant procedure to be applied and (ii) because of the absence of novel and effective drugs.

Every year, 30,000 patients in Europe and 20,000 in the USA are diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). More than half of them are over 65 years old. In this older population, the median overall survival (OS) is only 2 to 8 months. With conventional induction chemotherapy or hypometylating agents, the expected 2-year OS is less than 25% in patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease.

Performing an allo-HSCT in older patients is however still controversial because of the higher risk of non-relapse mortality (15 to 35%) and graft-versus-host disease. Depending on the center policy, patients older than 65 years will either be contraindicated for transplant or will receive allo-HSCT. Noteworthy, no prospective randomized trial has yet compared allo-HSCT to a non-transplant strategy in older patients with AML. A previous attempt made 10 years ago, by the EBMT to run a slightly similar trial, has failed in France and most European countries, mainly (i) because it mandated the type of transplant procedure to be applied and (ii) because of the absence of novel and effective drugs.

New targeted therapies and treatment strategies are evolving rapidly. A standardized unique treatment administrated to all sub-types of AML is no longer the optimal approach for induction and non-transplant maintenance strategies. No treatment has reached consensus for older patients. For these reasons, this trial will not limit the choices of drugs administered to the patients but compare two strategies allowing patients to receive the best available standard of care.

The trial aim to assess prospectively the outcomes and quality of life of older patients with AML receiving allo-HSCT strategy compared to those receiving a non-transplant approach.

Patients will receive initial treatment with chemotherapy (or other appropriate non-palliative therapy). Once first complete remission is achieved and a donor is identified, patients will be included.

Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) after inclusion to receive one of the following strategy:

  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation arm: patients will undergo allo-HSCT after consolidation therapy (or completion of other appropriate non-palliative strategy) according to standard procedures of the transplant center (choice of donor, conditioning regimen, GVHD and infection prophylaxis). The use of novel therapies (such as sorafenib, midaustorine, venetoclax, etc.) will be allowed as post-transplantation maintenance strategy

  • Non-transplant arm: patients will be treated according to the standard procedures of the treating center for this type of population.

All patients will receive the best available treatments (including additional conventional chemotherapy or other non-palliative therapies such as 5-azacytidine, decitabine, venetoclax, midaustorine, enasidenib, etc.). Supportive care will be performed according to each participating center usual practice.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
172 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Versus Best Available Standard of Care Therapy in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Randomized Phase 3 Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 31, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Chemotherapy

Drug: Best chemotherapy treatment
patients will be treated according to the standard procedures of the treating center for this type of population. Patients will receive the best available treatments (including additional conventional chemotherapy or other non-palliative therapies such as 5-azacytidine, decitabine, venetoclax, midaustorine, enasidenib, etc.).

Experimental: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Time of transplant procedure The best available treatments of AML

Procedure: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
patients will undergo allo-HSCT after consolidation therapy (or completion of other appropriate non-palliative strategy) according to standard procedures of the transplant center (choice of donor, conditioning regimen, GVHD and infection prophylaxis). The use of novel therapies (such as sorafenib, midaustorine, venetoclax, etc.) will be allowed as post-transplantation maintenance strategy.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall survival [2 years after the inclusion]

    From inclusion (time of identification of potential donor) until death or at 24 months, whichever comes first]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Leukemia free survival [within the 2 years after inclusion]

    from inclusion (time of identification of potential donor) until relapse and/or death from any cause or at 24 months, whichever comes first

  2. Assessment of MRD and time to relapse from inclusion up to 2 years [: time between inclusion and date of relapse or at 24 months, whichever comes first]]

  3. Quality of life FACT-BMT [at baseline, 12 and 24 months after inclusion]

    FACT-BMT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant)

  4. Quality of life EQ 5D 5L [at baseline, 12 and 24 months after inclusion]

    EQ 5D 5L (EuroQol group)

  5. The Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) expressed in cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained [2 years after inclusion]

    from inclusion (time of identification of potential donor) until death from any cause or at 24 months, whichever comes first

  6. The Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) expressed in cost per Life Year Gained [2 years after inclusion]

    from inclusion (time of identification of potential donor) until death from any cause or at 24 months, whichever comes first

  7. Non-relapse mortality [within the 2 years after inclusion]

    from inclusion (time of identification of potential donor) until death without evidence of relapse or at 24 months, whichever comes first

  8. In allo-HSCT patients only: cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [within the 2 years after inclusion]

    from transplantation until occurrence of GVHD or death from any cause or at 24 months after inclusion, whichever comes first

  9. In allo-HSCT patients only: severity of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [within the 2 years after inclusion]

    from transplantation until occurrence of GVHD or death from any cause or at 24 months after inclusion, whichever comes first

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Men and women

  • Age ≥ 65 and ≤ 75 years

  • Newly diagnosed patients with de novo or secondary AML in first complete remission who are considered as potential candidates and eligible for an allo-HSCT procedure

  • Presence of a donor (matched related or unrelated or haplo-mismatched) willing to donate peripheral blood stem cells

  • Patient is fit for the allo-HSCT procedure

  • Patient is fit for further consolidation therapy (non-transplant arm)

  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia (AML FAB M3)

  • AML deemed not eligible for allo-HSCT

  • Karnofsky score <70%

  • HIV positive patient

  • Life expectancy less than one month according to the attending physician

  • Acute or chronic heart failure (Cardiac ejection fraction < 40%)

  • Pulmonary function - diffusion capacity < 50% predicted

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate < 50 ml/min (CKD-EPI)

  • Severe neurological disorders

  • Patient subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship and safeguard of justice) or unable to consent

  • Patient deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision

  • Patient with severe psychiatric disorders or hospitalized without consent for psychiatric care

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Saint Antoine Hospital - Hematology Department Paris France 75012

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rémy DULERY, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04822766
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • APHP200134
  • 2020-A01456-33
First Posted:
Mar 30, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jan 25, 2022
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 25, 2022