Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Fatigue, reduced quality of life and declines in physical function are common in patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Studies in other cancer patients undergoing treatment have shown that exercise improves these symptoms, but there are limited studies in AML. This study of a hospital-based exercise program will help determine if exercise is both feasible and helpful in improving symptoms among for AML patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Background: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a life-threatening haematological malignancy. Initial treatment with induction chemotherapy requires 4-5 weeks of hospitalization, with a risk of physical deconditioning, declines in quality of life (QOL), and significant fatigue. Four pilot exercise studies have demonstrated improved fitness, strength, QOL, and fatigue in patients undergoing induction, but are limited by small sample sizes, recruitment of mostly younger adults, inconsistent endpoints, and design issues. Prior to conducting a large multi-centre randomized controlled trial (RCT), important pilot work first needs to be done to demonstrate feasibility of a randomized trial of an exercise program in AML patients undergoing induction chemotherapy; to ensure safety; and to provide effect estimates of the intervention on fitness and QOL/fatigue endpoints.
Objectives: Primary objectives are: (1) to determine feasibility of recruitment and retention of adult AML patients to a randomized trial of supervised exercise and ability of patients to perform an exercise intervention in hospital; (2) to provide estimates of the effect of exercise on fitness parameters. Secondary objectives are: (1) to determine effects of exercise on QOL and fatigue; (2) to understand the impact of exercise on AML treatment tolerability; (3) to examine safety of the exercise intervention. Methods: Thirty-five patients age 18 or older with newly diagnosed or relapsed AML who are undergoing induction chemotherapy will be recruited at Princess Margaret Hospital. Participants will perform 30-45 minutes of supervised aerobic and resistance exercises 4-5 days per week. Primary outcomes are recruitment rate, exercise adherence rate, and impact on fitness measures (peak aerobic capacity (VO2peak), grip strength, leg strength, 6-minute walk test). QOL will be measured with the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core 30-item questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Fatigue will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy fatigue subscale (FACT-Fatigue). Treatment tolerability outcomes include length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and the development of sepsis. Outcomes over time will be assessed using mixed effects regression models.
Significance: Exercise is a promising intervention for improving fitness, QOL and treatment tolerability in AML patients undergoing induction chemotherapy. This pilot RCT will establish feasibility and safety, as well as provide efficacy estimates that will be vital to the design and conduct of a definitive multi-centre RCT of exercise in this patient population.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Exercise
|
Other: Exercise
After obtaining daily medical clearance, patients will be approached 4-5 days per week to perform 30-45 minutes of supervised exercise with a Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) - Certified Exercise Physiologist. All exercise sessions will be as tolerated, based on patient symptoms.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Peak Aerobic Capacity (VO2peak) [Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
The modified Bruce protocol is a walking-based treadmill test used to assess peak aerobic capacity. As the test progresses the intensity of each 3-minute work load increases. The test concludes when the participant reaches his maximal heart rate or volitional fatigue. The value attained on this test is measured in metabolic equivalents (METS). METS are a measure of exercise intensity and reflect the physical demands of an activity. In this context, a higher value achieved on the treadmill test (in METS) indicates work at a higher intensity and therefore a higher aerobic capacity.
- 6-minute Walk Test [Baseline, Post-induction (4-6 weeks)]
Measure of functional endurance assessed by the walking distance covered in a 6-minute period. Participants walk a pre-established course for a total of 6 minutes. The distance covered in that time is recorded as the 6-minute walk test score.
- Timed 10-chair Stands [Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Measure of lower-body strength completed by standing from a seated position 10 times as quickly as possible.
- Grip Strength [Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Measure of upper-body strength using a Jamar hand dynamometer. Participants were asked to hold and squeeze (the dynamometer) with maximal force. Three trials were completed with each hand, alternating between the right and left to minimize fatigue. The highest recorded value of the dominant hand was used in the analysis.
- Recruitment Rate [Baseline]
Ratio of patients who consented to participate out of all eligible patients expressed as a percentage (eligible patients who consented to participation/eligible patients who declined participation).
- Retention [Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Percentage of participants who remained in the study (did not withdraw voluntarily).
- Program Adherence. [Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Adherence to supervised exercise program assessed as a percentage of exercise sessions completed(number of days of supervised exercise performed/the number of days that patients were approached to participate).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Global Quality of Life [Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Global quality of life (QOL) will be measured by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core 30-item questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a widely used, self-reported, psychometrically sound cancer QOL instrument. QOL scores derived from this questionnaire range from 0-100 with a higher score reflecting a higher QOL.
- Fatigue [Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Fatigue will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy fatigue subscale (FACT-Fatigue). The FACT-Fatigue consists of 13 questions and has excellent psychometric characteristics. Fatigue scores derived from this questionnaire range from 0-52 with a higher score reflecting lower fatigue.
- Length of Stay [Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Length of stay (date of admission to hospital to date of discharge).
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission [Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Intensive care unit (ICU) admission (percentage of participants admitted to ICU during induction chemotherapy course).
- Development of Sepsis [Post-induction (weeks 4-6)]
Development of sepsis (percentage of participants who developed sepsis during induction chemotherapy course).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
at least 18 years old
-
newly diagnosed AML, or relapsed AML after having been in complete remission for at least 6 months
-
initiating induction chemotherapy
-
ambulatory without need for human assistance
-
has consented to study
-
is medically cleared for participation by attending physician
Exclusion Criteria:
-
has another active malignancy
-
has life expectancy < 1 month, physician determined
-
has significant comorbidity
-
has uncontrolled pain
-
has haemodynamic instability
-
lacks fluency in reading and writing English and there is no translator available for each visit
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Princess Margaret Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5G 2M9 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shabbir MH Alibhai, MD, MSc, University Health Network, Toronto Rehab Institute
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- AML002
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | This non-randomized phase II study recruited patients between June 2010 and February 2011. All participants were recruited from Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) in Toronto, Canada. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 35 |
COMPLETED | 29 |
NOT COMPLETED | 6 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Overall Participants | 35 |
Age, Customized (years) [Number] | |
<60 years |
18
|
>=60 years |
17
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
19
54.3%
|
Male |
16
45.7%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Peak Aerobic Capacity (VO2peak) |
---|---|
Description | The modified Bruce protocol is a walking-based treadmill test used to assess peak aerobic capacity. As the test progresses the intensity of each 3-minute work load increases. The test concludes when the participant reaches his maximal heart rate or volitional fatigue. The value attained on this test is measured in metabolic equivalents (METS). METS are a measure of exercise intensity and reflect the physical demands of an activity. In this context, a higher value achieved on the treadmill test (in METS) indicates work at a higher intensity and therefore a higher aerobic capacity. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 35 |
Baseline |
6.9
(1.8)
|
Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
7.4
(1.7)
|
Title | 6-minute Walk Test |
---|---|
Description | Measure of functional endurance assessed by the walking distance covered in a 6-minute period. Participants walk a pre-established course for a total of 6 minutes. The distance covered in that time is recorded as the 6-minute walk test score. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Post-induction (4-6 weeks) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 35 |
Baseline |
962.5
(286.3)
|
Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
1176.2
(360.6)
|
Title | Timed 10-chair Stands |
---|---|
Description | Measure of lower-body strength completed by standing from a seated position 10 times as quickly as possible. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 35 |
Baseline |
33.0
(26.0)
|
Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
31.1
(11.2)
|
Title | Grip Strength |
---|---|
Description | Measure of upper-body strength using a Jamar hand dynamometer. Participants were asked to hold and squeeze (the dynamometer) with maximal force. Three trials were completed with each hand, alternating between the right and left to minimize fatigue. The highest recorded value of the dominant hand was used in the analysis. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 35 |
Baseline |
23.9
(11.0)
|
Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
21.6
(11.0)
|
Title | Global Quality of Life |
---|---|
Description | Global quality of life (QOL) will be measured by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core 30-item questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a widely used, self-reported, psychometrically sound cancer QOL instrument. QOL scores derived from this questionnaire range from 0-100 with a higher score reflecting a higher QOL. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 34 |
Baseline |
45.1
(26.6)
|
Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
51.4
(21.4)
|
Title | Fatigue |
---|---|
Description | Fatigue will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy fatigue subscale (FACT-Fatigue). The FACT-Fatigue consists of 13 questions and has excellent psychometric characteristics. Fatigue scores derived from this questionnaire range from 0-52 with a higher score reflecting lower fatigue. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 34 |
Baseline |
31.5
(13.1)
|
Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
33.9
(11.7)
|
Title | Length of Stay |
---|---|
Description | Length of stay (date of admission to hospital to date of discharge). |
Time Frame | Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 34 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [days] |
37.2
(10.6)
|
Title | Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission |
---|---|
Description | Intensive care unit (ICU) admission (percentage of participants admitted to ICU during induction chemotherapy course). |
Time Frame | Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 34 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
11.5
32.9%
|
Title | Development of Sepsis |
---|---|
Description | Development of sepsis (percentage of participants who developed sepsis during induction chemotherapy course). |
Time Frame | Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 34 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
26.5
75.7%
|
Title | Recruitment Rate |
---|---|
Description | Ratio of patients who consented to participate out of all eligible patients expressed as a percentage (eligible patients who consented to participation/eligible patients who declined participation). |
Time Frame | Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
For this outcome measure we analyzed 52 participants (rather than 35). Fifty-two participants met the study eligibility criteria. Thirty-five out of 52 consented to participate which is how we derived our recruitment rate of 67% (35/52). |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 52 |
Number [percentage of patients] |
67
|
Title | Retention |
---|---|
Description | Percentage of participants who remained in the study (did not withdraw voluntarily). |
Time Frame | Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 35 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
97
277.1%
|
Title | Program Adherence. |
---|---|
Description | Adherence to supervised exercise program assessed as a percentage of exercise sessions completed(number of days of supervised exercise performed/the number of days that patients were approached to participate). |
Time Frame | Baseline, Post-induction (weeks 4-6) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. |
Measure Participants | 34 |
Number [percentage of exercise days completed] |
45.8
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse event data were captured over the course of the intervention (9 months). | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Any adverse events were captured using the National Cancer Institute: Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Terminology Criteria version 3.0. | |
Arm/Group Title | Exercise | |
Arm/Group Description | All study participants were part of the exercise group as this was a non-randomized study. Participants were approached 4-5 times per week to participate in supervised, individualized exercise sessions that incorporated a combination of aerobic, resistance and flexibility exercises. Exercise was light to moderate in intensity and each exercise session was 30-45 minutes in length. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Exercise | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Exercise | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/35 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Exercise | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/35 (2.9%) | |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Possible grade II musculoskeletal event | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Sara O'Neill |
---|---|
Organization | University Health Network |
Phone | 416-597-3422 ext 7860 |
o'neill.sara@torontorehab.on.ca |
- AML002