Tirofiban Intracoronary Bolus-only Versus Intravenous Bolus Plus Infusion in STEMI Patients
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized trial is to compare the efficacy of high dose tirofiban administered as either an intracoronary bolus alone or as an intravenous bolus followed by a maintenance infusion with respect to microvascular perfusion and long term left ventricular infarct size, volumes and function.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently the treatment of choice for patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Nevertheless, despite restoration of normal epicardial flow, myocardial perfusion remains impaired in approximately half of patients and is associated with a poor prognosis. A variety of invasive and non-invasive techniques have been proposed to evaluate microvascular perfusion and several invasive hemodynamic measures have been closely associated with microvascular damage.In order to improve microvascular perfusion after primary PCI, a variety of treatment strategies have been developed, such as adjunctive administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs). Although current ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that small molecule GPIs should be administered as a bolus followed by 18 hours of continuous infusion, changes in clinical practice may obviate the need for a maintenance infusion in current practice.
We hypothesized that when tirofiban is administered via intracoronary route, a bolus-only strategy may even be superior to intravenous bolus plus infusion strategy in maintaining myocardial perfusion. In order to evaluate microvascular function, we used a guidewire tipped with pressure and temperature sensors and measured the coronary hemodynamic parameters, as the index of microvascular resistance and coronary flow reserve, measures which have been closely associated with microvascular damage. In order to increase the predictive value of these indices, we performed these measurements four to five days after MI, because it has been shown that the extent of microvascular dysfunction changes, particularly within first 48 hours after reperfusion and stabilizes between 2 days and 1 week after perfusion
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tirofiban intracoronary bolus-only Tirofiban bolus administered via intracoronary route at the time of primary PCI with no additional peri/postprocedural maintenance infusion |
Drug: tirofiban intracoronary bolus-only
administer tirofiban bolus intracoronary during primary percutaneous coronary intervention with no additional maintenance infusion
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Tirofiban intravenous bolus+infusion Tirofiban bolus administered intravenously before PCI, followed by periprocedural maintenance infusion |
Drug: tirofiban intravenous bolus plus infusion
administer tirofiban bolus intravenously and maintain infusion for up to 18 hours
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Indices of microvascular perfusion [Post-PCI day 4 to 5]
Intracoronary hemodynamic measures of index of microvascular resistance and coronary flow reserve
Secondary Outcome Measures
- ST segment resolution [post-PCI 90. minute]
- corrected TIMI frame count [immediately after PCI, post-PCI day 4 to 5]
- Myocardial Blush Grade [immediately after PCI, post-PCI day 4 to 5]
- Scintigraphic infarct size [6th month]
Left ventricular infarct size by SPECT
- Changes in left ventricular volume [Post-PCI day 3- 6th month]
Measured with echocardiography by using modified Simpson's method
- Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events [6 month]
composite of reinfarction, target vessel revascularization and death.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Typical ongoing ischemic chest pain for longer than 30 minutes
-
ST segment elevation of 0,1 mV or greater in at least two contiguous leads or a new left bundle branch block on the initial ECG.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Cardiogenic shock and / or clinical instability
-
previous STEMI
-
Malignant life threatening diseases
-
Presence of an additional lesion causing more than 50% narrowing distal to the culprit lesion
-
Contraindications to aspirin, clopidogrel, or heparin
-
inability to give informed consent.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Kosuyolu Heart Hospital
- The Society of Cardiac Health Protection
Investigators
- Study Chair: Cevat Kırma, Assoc.Prof, Kosuyolu Heart and Research Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Ayhan Erkol, M.D, Kosuyolu Heart and Research Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 33