Paravertebral Catheters for Pancreatic Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Design: Level I randomized prospective outcomes study comparing two groups of patients. One group will receive bupivacaine and dilaudid thoracic epidural analgesia (PCA) post-operatively. The other will receive bilateral ultrasound guided paravertebral blocks with indwelling paravertebral catheters with an infusion of 0.2% ropivicaine post-operatively and a PCA.
Sample Size: 50 patients Study Duration: Approximately 12 months Population:. Patients presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center for elective open pancreatic surgery.
Primary Objective: To determine if bilateral paravertebral catheters in patients with open pancreatic procedures result in decreased pain compared to patients treated with thoracic epidural for post-operative pain.
Secondary Objectives:
-
To determine whether the use of bilateral paravertebral catheters impacts the length of ICU and hospital stay for patients, compared to a thoracic epidurals in patients undergoing elective open pancreatic surgery.
-
To determine whether the use of ultrasound guided bilateral paravertebral catheters leads to lower risk of complications, compared to use of a thoracic epidural in patients undergoing open pancreatic surgery.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Design: Level I randomized prospective outcomes study comparing two groups of patients. One group will receive buipvacanine and dilaudid thoracic epidural analgesia (PCA) post-operatively. The other will receive bilateral ultrasound guided paravertebral blocks with indwelling paravertebral catheters with an infusion of 0.2% ropivicaine post-operatively and a PCA.
Sample Size: 50 patients Study Duration: Approximately 12 months Population:. Patients presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center for elective open pancreatic surgery.
Primary Objective: To determine if bilateral paravertebral catheters in patients with open pancreatic procedures result in decreased total maximal pain scores compared to patients treated with thoracic epidural for post-operative pain.
Secondary Objectives:
-
To determine whether the use of bilateral paravertebral catheters impacts the length of ICU and hospital stay for patients, compared to a thoracic epidurals in patients undergoing elective open pancreatic surgery.
-
To determine whether the use of ultrasound guided bilateral paravertebral catheters leads to lower risk of complications, compared to use of a thoracic epidural in patients undergoing open pancreatic surgery.
-
Synopsis and Medical Application:
Specific Aims:
Primary Hypothesis: Paravertebral catheters will result in improved pain control relative to thoracic epidural for post-operative pain from open pancreatic surgery.
Secondary Hypothesis: Paravertebral catheters will result in fewer hospital days and improved subjective respiratory function compared to patients in the thoracic epidural group.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard of Care Epidural placed for postoperative pain control |
Procedure: Epidural
A mid thoracic epidural is placed preoperatively and a local anesthetic and opioid infusion is run postoperatively
|
Experimental: Experimental Intervention Bilateral paravertebral catheters placed for postoperative pain control |
Procedure: Paravertebral catheters
Bilateral paravertebral catheters are placed and a local anesthetic infusion via an elastomeric pump is run postoperatively
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- total Maximal Pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale [on postoperative day 1 through postoperative day 5]
maximal pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale assessed by independent assessor
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Maximal Pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale [on postoperative day 1]
maximal pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale assessed by independent assessor
- Maximal Pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale [on postoperative day 2]
maximal pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale assessed by independent assessor
- Maximal Pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale [on postoperative day 3]
maximal pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale assessed by independent assessor
- Maximal Pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale [on postoperative day 4]
maximal pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale assessed by independent assessor
- Maximal Pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale [on postoperative day 5]
maximal pain scored via NRS 0-10 scale assessed by independent assessor
- Nausea/vomiting [the first five days postoperatively]
the presence of nausea and or vomiting endorsed by the patient as assessed by an independent assessor
- Length of stay [when the patient meets discharge criteria or is discharged home, expected length of stay 10 days]
up through the time the patient is discharged , expected length of stay 10 days.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- • All patients undergoing open pancreatic surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
• Previous difficult airway or multiple previous intubations
-
History of myasthenic syndrome
-
Systemic infection
-
Pre-existing sensory deficit
-
PT >14 or PTT >40 sec
-
Platelet count less than 50,000
-
Creatinine > 1.5
-
Allergy to local anesthetics
-
Patients who remain intubated for one week after surgery or who are unable to provide information as to their feelings of pain post-operatively for the first week post-operatively
-
Use of a spinal or epidural anesthetic for surgery
-
Daily use of opioid for more than a week or chronic pain syndrome
-
Lack of patient cooperation
-
Contraindication to regional anesthesia
-
Infection at injection site
-
Inability to guarantee sterile equipment or sterile conditions for the block
-
Patient refusal
-
Risk of local anesthetic toxicity
-
Coagulopathy or bleeding disorder
-
Severe respiratory disease (where the patient depends on intercostal muscle function for ventilation);
-
Ipsilateral diaphragmatic paresis;
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55455 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Minnesota
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 1203M11482