CHISPA: Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis: Randomized Controlled Trial

Sponsor
Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06113419
Collaborator
Universidad del Rosario (Other)
134
2
35

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare outcomes for interval or early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • To establish whether there is a difference in surgical outcomes comparing patients diagnosed with severe or moderately severe pancreatitis on which early cholecystectomy was performed versus performing interval cholecystectomy.

  • The primary endpoint will be to evaluate major complications, defined as a Clavien-Dindo score greater than or equal to III/V.

  • Secondary endpoints include evaluating minor complications (defined as a Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), biliary disease recurrence, mortality, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative admittance into an intensive care unit.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either group: early cholecystectomy during the pancreatitis hospitalization or interval cholecystectomy scheduled 4 weeks after clinical resolution of pancreatitis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
N/A

Detailed Description

CHISPA is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial. An intention- to-treat analysis will be performed. It seeks to evaluate differences between patients taken to early cholecystectomy during hospital admission (72 hours after randomization) versus delayed cholecystectomy (30 +/- 5 days after randomization). Primary endpoint is major complications associated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy defined as a Clavien-Dindo score of over III/V during the first 90 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints include recurrence of biliary disease, mortality, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), days of postoperative hospital stay, and days admitted in an intensive care unit postoperatively.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
134 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
CHISPA is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours after randomization) or interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (30 +/- 5 days after randomization).CHISPA is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours after randomization) or interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (30 +/- 5 days after randomization).
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis (CHISPA): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2024
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Early cholecystectomy

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours after randomization)

Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed using the standard American 4-port technique, insufflation will be achieved using CO2 to 15mmHg of pressure. Calot's triangle will be dissected until the critical view of safety is reached, being careful to dissect above the R4U line. After reaching the critical view of safety, two proximal and one distal clip will be placed on both the cystic conduct and artery separately, cutting the clips and then dissecting the gallbladder in a cystfundic direction. When the critical view of safety is not reached, the surgeon may perform a fundus-first cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, conversion to open procedure, intraoperative cholangiography or cholecystostomy to their own discretion. It will also be the surgeon's criteria to employ or not a drain system in the surgical site. The decision for theses interventions will be taken intraoperatively and will be according to findings during the procedure.

Active Comparator: Interval cholecystectomy

Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (30 +/- 5 days after randomization).

Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed using the standard American 4-port technique, insufflation will be achieved using CO2 to 15mmHg of pressure. Calot's triangle will be dissected until the critical view of safety is reached, being careful to dissect above the R4U line. After reaching the critical view of safety, two proximal and one distal clip will be placed on both the cystic conduct and artery separately, cutting the clips and then dissecting the gallbladder in a cystfundic direction. When the critical view of safety is not reached, the surgeon may perform a fundus-first cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, conversion to open procedure, intraoperative cholangiography or cholecystostomy to their own discretion. It will also be the surgeon's criteria to employ or not a drain system in the surgical site. The decision for theses interventions will be taken intraoperatively and will be according to findings during the procedure.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Major complications [90 days]

    Clavien-Dindo score III-V in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Recurrence [90 days]

    Biliary disease recurrence defined as a new admission for recurrent pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis, need fro ERCP or biliary colic previous to the surgical procedure until 90 postoperative days after it

  2. Mortality [90 days]

    Determine differences in mortality between patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

  3. Postoperative hospital stay length (general) [90 days]

    Compare differences in postoperative hospital stay length (general) in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

  4. Minor complications [90 days]

    Clavien-Dindo score I-II in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

  5. Postoperative hospital admittance and stay length in the ICU [90 days]

    Compare differences in postoperative hospital admittance and stay length in the ICU in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age ≥18 years, diagnosis of pancreatitis according to Atlanta guidelines, moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (APACHE score ≥8 on admittance)

  • Biliary pancreatitis diagnosed on imaging (be it ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and/or tomography)

  • Recovery of pancreatitis by tolerance of oral intake (defined as 24 hours of food consumption of any consistency without emetic episodes and pain defined as 4/10 on the visual analogue score of pain) and written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Pregnancy

  • History of cholecystectomy

  • Planned open cholecystectomy

  • Pancreatitis-associated complication before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (compartment syndrome, bleeding and/or need for peripancreatic collection drainage)

  • Chronic pancreatitis,

  • More than one episode of pancreatitis

  • Active malignant disease

  • Septic shock

  • Choledocholithiasis not resolved by ERCP, post-ERCP perforation and post-ERCP concomitant pancreatitis.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi
  • Universidad del Rosario

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Camilo Ramirez-Giraldo, MD, Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Camilo Ramirez Giraldo, General Surgeon, Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06113419
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2022-26-02B
  • DVO005 2456-CV1683
First Posted:
Nov 2, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Nov 2, 2023
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Camilo Ramirez Giraldo, General Surgeon, Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 2, 2023