Subtenon and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Effect on Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Sponsor
Menoufia University (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04668456
Collaborator
(none)
75
3
3
7.5
25
3.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study designed to compare the effects and the safety of adding dexmedetomidine to local anesthetics and its intravenous administration in subtenon block in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Ophthalmological surgery can be performed under topical, regional or general anesthesia. Recently, the majority of ocular surgeries performed by regional rather than general anesthesia, because of the regional anesthesia is more economic, easy to perform, and the risk involved is less. Orbital regional anesthesia can be done using a retrobulbar (intra-conal) block, peribulbar (extra-conal) block or sub-Tenon's block.

The STBs or episcleral block was first described by Turnbull in 1884 and it was repopularized in the 1990s as a simple and safe alternative to needle-based eye blocks. The STB becomes the most widely practiced regional technique for cataract surgery, because it produces satisfactory anesthesia for most intraocular procedures, and avoids the inherent risks of needle-based blocks, such as globe perforation and optic nerve injury.

Dexmedetomidine is a selective α-2 receptor agonist that produces sedation and analgesia without causing respiratory depression. It also allows patients to respond to verbal commands during the sedation; easy conversion from sleeping to awakening is possible. Therefore, dexmedetomidine has been used as sedative in various clinical fields in intensive care unit and surgery and an adjuvant to local anesthetics.

Many studies were done to evaluate its effect as sedative or anlgesic when administered either intravenously or when added to local anesthesia in ophthalmic block. But no one, till now comparing its effect when used as adjuvant to local anesthetics or administered intravenously in subtenon block.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
75 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
75 Patients were assigned into three equal groups, all patients received 2.5 ml of local anesthetic mixture through subtenon block and IV infusion of drugs as follows: Group C (control group): received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ saline 0.9% (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of saline 0.9% over 10 min. before subtenon block. Group SD ( subtenon dexmedetomidine): received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of saline 0.9% over 10 min. before subtenon block. Group ID (iv dexmedetomidine): received received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ saline 0.9% (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 min. before subtenon block.75 Patients were assigned into three equal groups, all patients received 2.5 ml of local anesthetic mixture through subtenon block and IV infusion of drugs as follows: Group C (control group): received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ saline 0.9% (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of saline 0.9% over 10 min. before subtenon block. Group SD ( subtenon dexmedetomidine): received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of saline 0.9% over 10 min. before subtenon block. Group ID (iv dexmedetomidine): received received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ saline 0.9% (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 min. before subtenon block.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Care Provider)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Effect of Subtenon and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery: A Comparative Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 15, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 14, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 30, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group C (control group)

Group C (control group): received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ saline 0.9% (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of saline 0.9% over 10 min. before subtenon block.

Drug: lidocaine 2%
subtenon injection

Drug: bupivacine 0.5%
subtenon injection

Drug: Normal saline
either subtenon or iv

Active Comparator: Group SD (subtenon dexmedetomiine)

Group SD ( subtenon dexmedetomidine): received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of saline 0.9% over 10 min. before subtenon block.

Drug: Dexmedetomidine
the drug administered either subtenon ot iv

Drug: lidocaine 2%
subtenon injection

Drug: bupivacine 0.5%
subtenon injection

Drug: Normal saline
either subtenon or iv

Active Comparator: Group ID (iv dexmedetomidine)

Group ID (iv dexmedetomidine): received received subtenon LA mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml)+ saline 0.9% (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 min. before subtenon block.

Drug: Dexmedetomidine
the drug administered either subtenon ot iv

Drug: lidocaine 2%
subtenon injection

Drug: bupivacine 0.5%
subtenon injection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. duration of sensory block [24 hours]

    time from injection of local anesthetic mixture to complete recovery from pain sensation or the first need of rescue analgesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. duration of motor block [24 hours]

    time from injection of local anesthetic to complete recovery of motor function in all ocular muscles.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • ASA grade I-III

  • Aged 18-70 years

  • Both sex

  • Scheduled for elective phacoemulsification cataract surgery

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Coagulation abnormalities

  • Impaired mental status

  • Refusal of the patient

  • Uncontrolled glaucoma

  • Recent surgical procedure on the same eye

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ashraf magdy Eskandr Shibīn Al Kawm Menoufiya Egypt 1234
2 Osama A Elmorsy Shibīn Al Kawm Menoufiya Egypt 1234
3 Sadik A Sadik Shibīn Al Kawm Menoufiya Egypt 1234

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Menoufia University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
ashraf magdy eskandr, assistant professor of anesthesia, icu, Menoufia University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04668456
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 8/8/2020 ANET4
First Posted:
Dec 16, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Feb 25, 2021
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Keywords provided by ashraf magdy eskandr, assistant professor of anesthesia, icu, Menoufia University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 25, 2021