High Flow Therapy vs Hypertonic Saline in Bronchiolitis

Sponsor
Ministry of Health, Spain (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01873144
Collaborator
(none)
75
2
2
26
37.5
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is superior to hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in the treatment of moderate acute viral bronchiolitis in infants in improving respiratory distress and comfort and reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) and admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Epinephrine 1/1000
  • Drug: HSS 3%
  • Device: HHHFNC
  • Drug: NS (0.9%)
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
75 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
High Flow Therapy vs Hypertonic Saline in Bronchiolitis Treatment. Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: HSS (3%) + epinephrine

Nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of HSS(3%) every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.

Drug: Epinephrine 1/1000
Nebulization of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria
Other Names:
  • Adrenaline 1/1000
  • Adrenalin 1/1000
  • Drug: HSS 3%
    Nebulization 2 mL of HSS (3%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

    Experimental: HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)

    Flow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.

    Drug: Epinephrine 1/1000
    Nebulization of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria
    Other Names:
  • Adrenaline 1/1000
  • Adrenalin 1/1000
  • Device: HHHFNC
    Precision Flow (Vapotherm Inc. Stevensville, Maryland, US ) and RT329 (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) were the dispositive used depending on the availability. Fisher and Paykel nasal cannula was used in both devices, depending on age

    Drug: NS (0.9%)
    Nebulization of 2 mL of NS (0.9%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria
    Other Names:
  • Normal saline solution 0.9%
  • Physiologic saline solution
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Difference in mean Respiratory Assessment Change Score (RACS) between groups in every time considered [Every 4h for three consecutive times beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study and after every 8h for three consecutive times (average of 36h)]

      RACS is calculated by combining 2 values: the difference between the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) score before and after treatment, plus a value of +1 for each 10% improvement (decrease) in the posttreatment respiratory rate (RR) or a value of -1 for each 10% worsening (increase) in RR.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Difference in mean comfort score along the monitoring period between groups [Every 8h for 6 consecutive times (two days) beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study]

      A scale was used for comfort evaluation . It is based on 4 items: rest, feeding, alertness and facial expression (facial pictures).Minimum 4-Maximum 16

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Length of hospital stay (LOS) in days in both groups [Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days]

    2. Admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit PICU (rate) in both groups [Transfer to PICU at any time during hospitalization]

      Transfer to PICU criteria were defined.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A to 6 Months
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Children aged 6 months or less

    • Moderate (Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score of 4 or greater) viral bronchiolitis (as defined by McConnockie)

    • Meeting Admission criteria

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • History of prematurity

    • Chronic lung disease

    • Cystic fibrosis

    • Congenital heart disease

    • Neuromuscular disease

    • Airway anomalies

    • Immunodeficiency

    • Those requiring immediate intubation and ventilation.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon Alcorcon Madrid Spain 28922
    2 Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa Leganes Madrid Spain 28911

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Ministry of Health, Spain

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Mercedes Bueno, MD, Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology. Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon. Madrid. SPAIN

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    MªMercedes Bueno Campaña, Dr, Ministry of Health, Spain
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01873144
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EC11-437
    First Posted:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2013
    Keywords provided by MªMercedes Bueno Campaña, Dr, Ministry of Health, Spain
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 7, 2013