PROPOSITIS: Prone Position in Acute Bronchiolitis

Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03976895
Collaborator
(none)
452
13
2
21.6
34.8
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Acute viral bronchiolitis is the leading cause of community-acquired acute respiratory failure in developed countries (20 000 to 30 000 hospitalizations each year in France). Between 5% and 22% of these children are hospitalized in a critical care unit to benefit from a respiratory support.

Non-invasive ventilation, in particular the nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP), reduces the work of breathing in children with bronchiolitis and is associated with decreased morbidity and hospitalization costs compared with invasive ventilation. Nowadays, this technique is considered as the gold standard in the pediatric intensive care units (PICU) in France. High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) has been proposed as an alternative to the nCPAP because of its better tolerance and simplicity of implementation. However, the proportion of failure remains high (35 to 50%), providing only a partial response to the care of these children, especially prior to the PICU.

In a physiological study (NCT02602678, article published), it has been demonstrated that prone position (PP) decrease, by almost 50%, the respiratory work of breathing and improve the respiratory mechanics in infants hospitalized in intensive care units for bronchiolitis.

Investigators hypothesize that prone position, during High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), would significantly reduce the use of non-invasive ventilation (nCPAP and others) or invasive ventilation, as compared to supine position during HFNC, in infants with moderate to severe viral bronchiolitis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Supine position (SP)
  • Procedure: Prone position (PP)
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
452 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Effect of Prone Position on the Use of Non-invasive and Invasive Ventilation in Infants With Moderate to Severe Acute Bronchiolitis
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 13, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Supine position (SP)

Supine position (SP) combined with HFNC

Procedure: Supine position (SP)
Infants under high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) will be positioned in the supine position. Patients may be positioned temporarily in lateral position between periods of supine position to limit ventilatory disorders, as it is usually done in critical care units during bronchiolitis.

Experimental: Prone position (PP)

Prone position (SP) combined with HFNC

Procedure: Prone position (PP)
Infants under high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) will be placed in the prone position during at least 24 hours over the first 48 hours. The positioning will be standardized (chest on the bed plan and abdomen cleared) and children should be placed in the prone position immediately after randomization. Patients may be positioned temporarily in lateral position between periods of prone position to limit ventilatory disorders, as it is usually done in critical care units during bronchiolitis.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of ventilated children in each of the 2 groups [3 days]

    Indications for the use of ventilation (invasive or non-invasive ventilation) will be standardized in both groups (based on the interregional protocol for the management of bronchiolitis): Clinical aggravation defined by an increase ≥ 1 point of the m-WCAS score Persistence of hypercapnic acidosis with pH ≤7.30 and pCO2≥ 8 kPa or FiO2> 60% under HFNC at 2 L/kg/min More than 2 significant apneas per hour (apnea with desaturation <90% and / or bradycardia <90 / min) Consciousness disorder Anytime over the first 3 days after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of failure [3 days]

    Failure is defined as: HFNC failure (composite failure criterion validated by an independent committee) worsening of mWCAS score ≥ 1 point hypercapnic acidosis (pH ≤7.30 and pCO2≥8kPa) significant apnea (apnea with desaturation <90% and / or bradycardia <90/min) Anytime over the first 3 days after inclusion

  2. Causes of failure [3 days]

    Failure is defined as: HFNC failure (composite failure criterion validated by an independent committee) worsening of mWCAS score ≥ 1 point hypercapnic acidosis (pH ≤7.30 and pCO2≥8kPa) significant apnea (apnea with desaturation <90% and / or bradycardia <90/min) Anytime over the first 3 days after inclusion

  3. Duration of ventilation [maximum 3 months]

    Duration of ventilation (high flow nasal cannula, invasive, non-invasive) in hours. This data will be collected at critical care unit discharge.

  4. Length of stay [maximum 3 months]

    Length of stay in days. This data will be collected at hospital discharge.

  5. Oxygenation evaluation [2 hours]

    Evolution of FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 ratio between inclusion and H2.

  6. Oxygenation evaluation [12 hours]

    Evolution of FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 ratio between inclusion and H12.

  7. Oxygenation evaluation [24 hours]

    Evolution of FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 ratio between inclusion and H24.

  8. Tolerance evaluation [maximum 3 months]

    Proportion of skin lesions, vomiting/regurgitation and exclusive enteral nutrition. This data will be collected at critical care unit discharge.

  9. Variation EDIN score (Scale of pain and discomfort of the newborn) between inclusion and after 2 hours [2 hours]

    Scale ranges to 0 from 15 and is a combination of criteria: Face: Relaxed=0 to Permanent tightness or prostrate face,frozen or purple face=3 Body: Relaxed=0 to Permanent agitation,tightness of extremities and stiffness of limbs or very poor and limited motor skills with fixed body=3 Sleep:Easily, extended and calm=0 to No sleep=3 Relationship:Smile to the angels,smile answer,attentive to the listening=0 to Refuses contact,no relationship possible,howl or moan without any stimulation=3 Comfort: Do not need comfort=0 to Inconsolable,desperate sucking=3

  10. Evaluation of the feasibility of maintaining the position [48 hours]

    Proportion of children in the prone position repositioned definitively in the supine position before performing the cumulative 24 hours of prone position, cumulative hours of prone position in the first 48 hours

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A to 6 Months
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Infant under 6 months

  • Hospitalized in critical care unit (continuous monitoring unit or intensive care unit)

  • With a clinical diagnosis of acute viral bronchiolitis (criterion of the American Academy of Pediatrics 2014)

  • m-WCAS score ≥ 3 and / or hypercapnic acidosis with pH <7.35 and pCO2> 50mmHg (6.7 kPa)

  • Informed consent signed by at least one of the parents with oral consent of the other parent (and / or legal guardian) recorded in the medical file.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Infant admitted with criteria for invasive or non-invasive ventilation (hypercapnic acidosis with pH <7.25 without ventilatory support and/or hypoxia with impossibility of maintaining SpO2> 92% whatever the FiO2 and/or more than 3 significant apneas per hour and/or severe consciousness disorder)

  • Patient already positioned in the prone position before randomization

  • Significant comorbidities with a history of respiratory pathology (bronchodysplasia with ventilatory support), Ear Nose and Throat pathology (pharyngolaryngomalacia) or neuromuscular and / or hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease.

  • Contraindication to Prone position : recent abdominal surgery (laparoschisis or omphalocele) or recent sternotomy

  • Patient who is not affiliated (or does not benefit from) to a national social security system

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Réanimation pédiatrique et unité de surveillance continue - Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon Bron France 69500
2 CHU de Caen, Service de réanimation et surveillance continue pédiatrique Caen France 14000
3 CH CHAMBERY Unité de surveillance continue pédiatrique Chambéry France 73000
4 Hôpital d'Enfants CHU de Dijon Service de réanimation pédiatrique Dijon France 21079
5 CH VILLEFRANCHE Service de pédiatrie néonatologie Gleizé France 69400
6 CHU GRENOBLE Service de réanimation pédiatrique Hôpital Couple Enfant La Tronche France 38700
7 CHU MONTPELLIER Service de réanimation pédiatrique Montpellier France 34295
8 CHU Nantes Unité de surveillance continue pédiatrique Hôpital mère-enfant Nantes France 44093
9 CHU LENVAL NICE Service de réanimation pédiatrique Nice France 06200
10 Hôpital Necker Enfant Malade, Paris Service de Réanimation et surveillance continue médicochirurgicales Paris France 75015
11 CHU SAINT-ETIENNE Service de réanimation pédiatrique Saint-Priest-en-Jarez France 42270
12 CRHU Nancy Réanimation Pédiatrique Spécialisée Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy France 54500
13 CH ANNECY GENEVOIS Unité de surveillance continue pédiatrique Épagny France 74370

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hospices Civils de Lyon
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03976895
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 69HCL19_0333
First Posted:
Jun 6, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Oct 21, 2021
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Hospices Civils de Lyon
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 21, 2021