Efficacy Study of a New Antimicrobial Wound Dressing to Treat Wounds Caused by Curettage and Electrodesiccation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this pilot clinical study is to compare healing rates, pain levels, and incidence of wound complications including infection with the use of a moist PROCELLERA™ Antimicrobial Wound Dressing when compared to a standard dressing, Mepilex® Border Lite, following curettage and electrodesiccation of skin lesions.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: PROCELLERA™Antimicrobial Dressing Dressing changes every 3 days, more frequently if needed |
Other: Procellera™ Antimicrobial Dressing
Dressing indicated for partial and full-thickness wounds.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Mepilex® Border Lite Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed |
Other: Mepilex® Border Lite
Self-adherent foam dressing
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed. |
Device: Adhesive Bandage
Adhesive bandage
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Patients Who Experienced 50% or Greater Wound Healing [3 Weeks]
Participants were assessed to see whether or not the wound area was reduced by at least 50%, and the number of such participants is reported
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of Patients Reporting Pain [3 Weeks]
Participants recorded their subjective pain level on a 0-10 Numeric Pain Chart 3x/day (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable), until they had no pain for 3 consecutive days. Participants were also given a Patient Medication Log to complete at home to record RX and OTC medication they took to relieve pain. They were instructed to write the medication name, dosage, and amount of pills they took, as well as time taken, every day they took pain medication. Participants reporting pain had an associated score.
- Erythema at Week 3 [3 Weeks]
At each weekly follow up visit, wound erythema was evaluated by the clinician on a scale of 0-4, with "0" being "No erythema", "1" being "Very slight erythema", "2" being "Well defined erythema", "3" being "Moderate to severe erythema" and 4 being "Severe erythema to slight eschar formation"
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
If female, must either be not of childbearing potential or if they are of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test.
-
Wound size greater than 1x1 cm
-
Wounds must be ≥5 cm away from all other wounds
-
Wound size must not be diminished in size greater than 10% between enrollment in study and the prescreening
-
Participant agrees to participate in follow-up evaluation
-
Participant must be able to read and understand informed consent, and sign the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Concurrent participation in another clinical trial that involves an investigational drug or device that would interfere with this study
-
Participant is to receive another topical antimicrobial agent other than the study dressing
-
Participant with sensitivity or adverse reactions to silver or zinc
-
Pregnancy or nursing an infant or child
-
Immunosuppression
-
Active or systemic infection
-
Peripheral vascular occlusive disease
-
Collagen vascular disease
-
Connective tissue disease
-
Diabetes
-
Venous stasis ulcers
-
Participant undergoing active cancer chemotherapy
-
Chronic steroid use
-
Decision impairment
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sheftel Associates Dermatology | Tucson | Arizona | United States | 85718 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Vomaris Innovations
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Scott N Sheftel, MD, Sheftel Associates Dermatology
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- XSMP-002
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Recruitment dates: June 2008-August 2008 Location: Dermatology Clinic |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Antimicrobial dressing for partial and full-thickness wounds. Produces small amount of current when in contact with conductive fluid. Used as primary contact layer for wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 3 days, more frequently if needed | Self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing. Placed over wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed | Adhesive bandage containing absorbtive pad secured to self-adherent strip. Placed over wound caused by curettage & electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 13 | 8 | 5 |
COMPLETED | 13 | 8 | 5 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Antimicrobial dressing for partial and full-thickness wounds. Produces small amount of current when in contact with conductive fluid. Used as primary contact layer for wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 3 days, more frequently if needed | Self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing. Placed over wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed | Adhesive bandage containing absorbtive pad secured to self-adherent strip. Placed over wound caused by curettage & electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 13 | 8 | 5 | 26 |
Age (Count of Participants) | ||||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
1
7.7%
|
1
12.5%
|
1
20%
|
3
11.5%
|
>=65 years |
12
92.3%
|
7
87.5%
|
4
80%
|
23
88.5%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
76.6
(8.4)
|
74.8
(9.9)
|
76.6
(8.4)
|
74.9
(8.6)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
4
30.8%
|
2
25%
|
2
40%
|
8
30.8%
|
Male |
9
69.2%
|
6
75%
|
3
60%
|
18
69.2%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||
United States |
13
100%
|
8
100%
|
5
100%
|
26
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Patients Who Experienced 50% or Greater Wound Healing |
---|---|
Description | Participants were assessed to see whether or not the wound area was reduced by at least 50%, and the number of such participants is reported |
Time Frame | 3 Weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Antimicrobial dressing for partial and full-thickness wounds. Produces small amount of current when in contact with conductive fluid. Used as primary contact layer for wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 3 days, more frequently if needed | Self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing. Placed over wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed | Adhesive bandage containing absorbtive pad secured to self-adherent strip. Placed over wound caused by curettage & electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 8 | 5 |
Number [Participants] |
13
100%
|
7
87.5%
|
4
80%
|
Title | Number of Patients Reporting Pain |
---|---|
Description | Participants recorded their subjective pain level on a 0-10 Numeric Pain Chart 3x/day (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable), until they had no pain for 3 consecutive days. Participants were also given a Patient Medication Log to complete at home to record RX and OTC medication they took to relieve pain. They were instructed to write the medication name, dosage, and amount of pills they took, as well as time taken, every day they took pain medication. Participants reporting pain had an associated score. |
Time Frame | 3 Weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Antimicrobial dressing for partial and full-thickness wounds. Produces small amount of current when in contact with conductive fluid. Used as primary contact layer for wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 3 days, more frequently if needed | Self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing. Placed over wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed | Adhesive bandage containing absorbtive pad secured to self-adherent strip. Placed over wound caused by curettage & electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 8 | 5 |
Number [Participants] |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Title | Erythema at Week 3 |
---|---|
Description | At each weekly follow up visit, wound erythema was evaluated by the clinician on a scale of 0-4, with "0" being "No erythema", "1" being "Very slight erythema", "2" being "Well defined erythema", "3" being "Moderate to severe erythema" and 4 being "Severe erythema to slight eschar formation" |
Time Frame | 3 Weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Antimicrobial dressing for partial and full-thickness wounds. Produces small amount of current when in contact with conductive fluid. Used as primary contact layer for wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 3 days, more frequently if needed | Self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing. Placed over wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed | Adhesive bandage containing absorbtive pad secured to self-adherent strip. Placed over wound caused by curettage & electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 8 | 5 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Erythema Scores on a Scale] |
0.45
(0.82)
|
1.29
(1.11)
|
0.60
(0.55)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||
Arm/Group Title | Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage | |||
Arm/Group Description | Antimicrobial dressing for partial and full-thickness wounds. Produces small amount of current when in contact with conductive fluid. Used as primary contact layer for wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 3 days, more frequently if needed | Self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing. Placed over wound following curettage and electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed | Adhesive bandage containing absorbtive pad secured to self-adherent strip. Placed over wound caused by curettage & electrodesiccation. Dressing changes every 2-3 days, more frequently if needed. | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/13 (0%) | 0/8 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Procellera Dressing | Mepilex® Border Lite | Band-Aid® Adhesive Bandage | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/13 (0%) | 0/8 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Scott Sheftel, MD |
---|---|
Organization | Sheftel Associates Dermatology, LLC |
Phone | 520-293-5757 ext 7106 |
ssheftel@sheftelderm.com |
- XSMP-002