Symptom Control With or Without Docetaxel in Treating Patients With Relapsed Esophageal Cancer or Stomach Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Analgesics, antiemetics, steroids, and radiation therapy are effective in helping to control symptoms caused by cancer. It is not yet known whether these treatments are more effective when given with or without docetaxel in treating patients with relapsed esophageal cancer or stomach cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying symptom control given together with docetaxel to see how well it works compared with symptom control given without docetaxel in treating patients with relapsed esophageal cancer or stomach cancer.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare overall survival of patients with relapsed adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or stomach after treatment with docetaxel and active symptom control vs active symptom control alone.
Secondary
-
To determine the time to documented progression in patients treated with docetaxel.
-
To assess response rates to docetaxel in patients treated with docetaxel.
-
To determine toxicity of docetaxel in patients treated with docetaxel.
-
To assess the quality of life of these patients.
-
To evaluate the health economic impact.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
Patients are stratified according to stage (locally advanced vs metastatic), site of disease (esophagus vs esophagogastric junction vs stomach), duration of response to prior chemotherapy (no response vs response duration < 3 months vs response duration 3-6 months), and ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
-
Arm I: Patients receive docetaxel IV over 1 hour on day 1 and active symptom control (e.g., analgesics [including opioids], antiemetics, steroids, palliative radiotherapy) daily.
-
Arm II: Patients receive active symptom control as in arm I. Courses repeat every 3 weeks for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients in arm I undergo tissue biopsy collection at baseline and after 3 courses of treatment for biomarker analysis.
Quality of life is assessed by the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 questionnaires at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Health resource use is assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire at baseline and then periodically during and after treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 6 weeks for 1 year and then every 3 months thereafter.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Overall survival []
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Time to documented progression (arm I) []
- Response rate (arm I) []
- Toxicity (arm I) []
- Quality of life as assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 and -STO22 []
- Health economic evaluation as assessed by EQ-5D []
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
-
Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or stomach, including adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
-
Advanced disease not amenable to curative treatment
-
Documented progressive disease while receiving or within 6 months of completion of first-line chemotherapy with a platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based therapy either for advanced disease or as neoadjuvant/perioperative therapy
-
No cerebral or leptomeningeal metastasis
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
-
ECOG performance status 0-2
-
Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
-
Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
-
WBC ≥ 3.0 x 10^9/L
-
ANC ≥ 1.5 x 10^9/L
-
Platelets ≥ 100 x 10^9/L
-
Creatinine normal OR creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min
-
Total bilirubin normal
-
ALT ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
-
Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times ULN
-
Not pregnant or nursing
-
Negative pregnancy test
-
Fertile patients must use effective barrier contraception during and for 3 months after completion of treatment
-
No clinically significant peripheral neuropathy (grade 2-4)
-
No prior malignancy except for curatively treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
-
No medical or psychiatric condition that would influence the ability of patients to provide informed consent
-
No other serious or uncontrolled illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes it undesirable for the patient to enter the trial
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
-
See Disease Characteristics
-
No prior chemotherapy with taxanes
-
≤ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen in advanced setting allowed
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre | Bristol | England | United Kingdom | BS2 8ED |
2 | Addenbrooke's Hospital | Cambridge | England | United Kingdom | CB2 2QQ |
3 | Warwick Medical School Clinical Trials Unit | Coventry | England | United Kingdom | CV4 7AL |
4 | St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital | Guildford | England | United Kingdom | GU2 7XX |
5 | Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit | London | England | United Kingdom | NW1 2DA |
6 | Royal South Hants Hospital | Southampton | England | United Kingdom | SO14 0YG |
7 | Aberdeen Royal Infirmary | Aberdeen | Scotland | United Kingdom | AB25 2ZN |
8 | Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital | Cardiff | Wales | United Kingdom | CF14 2TL |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hugo Ford, MD, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CRCA-COUGAR-02
- CDR0000649670
- EudraCT-2006-005046-37
- ISRCTN13366390
- CRUK/07/013
- EU-20969