Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating Patients With Colorectal Disease
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is being done to evaluate single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal diseases, compared to multi-port laparoscopic surgery. This study is also intended to standardize the SILS technique for colorectal diseases
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
-
To report the experience of SILS procedure in the treatment of colorectal disease.
-
To standardize the SILS technique.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo single incision laparoscopic surgery with GelPortĀ® attachment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and at 1 year.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Treatment (single incision laparoscopic surgery) Patients undergo single incision laparoscopic surgery with GelPortĀ® attachment. |
Procedure: therapeutic laparoscopic surgery
Undergo single incision laparoscopic surgery
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Operative time [Up to 1 year]
Summarized using descriptive statistics (i.e. means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables, and frequencies for discrete data).
- Length of skin and fascial incisions [Up to 1 year]
Summarized using descriptive statistics (i.e. means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables, and frequencies for discrete data).
- Estimated blood loss [Up to 1 year]
Summarized using descriptive statistics (i.e. means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables, and frequencies for discrete data).
- Oncologic sample including size of specimen removed, number of lymph nodes (LN) removed, pathological type and staging, lymph node, vessel or perineural invasion, and status of margins [Up to 1 year]
Summarized using descriptive statistics (i.e. means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables, and frequencies for discrete data).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Quality of life measured using the short form (SF)-12 health related quality of life scale (HQRL) scored using quality metric licensed software [Baseline]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Quality of life measured using the SF-12 HQRL scored using quality metric licensed software [2 weeks]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Quality of life measured using the SF-12 HQRL scored using quality metric licensed software [3 months]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Quality of life measured using the SF-12 HQRL scored using quality metric licensed software [6 months]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Visual analogue pain scale scored on the scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the maximum pain [Baseline]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Visual analogue pain scale scored on the scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the maximum pain [2 weeks]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Visual analogue pain scale scored on the scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the maximum pain [3 months]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Visual analogue pain scale scored on the scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the maximum pain [6 months]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Visual analogue cosmesis scale scored on the scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is "worst scar", and 10 is the "best scar" [2 weeks]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Visual analogue cosmesis scale scored on the scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is "worst scar", and 10 is the "best scar" [3 months]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
- Visual analogue cosmesis scale scored on the scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is "worst scar", and 10 is the "best scar" [6 months]
Linear mixed model will be applied with repeated measures considering the observations from the same patient are correlated.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients who are willing to give consent and comply with the evaluation and the treatment schedule
-
Patients with disease processes limited to the right colon; this will include Crohn's disease, polyp disease, and cancers of the right colon
-
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) =< 3
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Inability to obtain informed consent
-
Previous right colon surgery
-
Previous extensive abdominal surgery that would limit the laparoscopic approach
-
Stage IV disease at surgery
-
Metastatic disease diagnosed by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or nuclear imaging
-
Patient enrolled in other interventional study
-
ASA score greater than 3
-
Any condition which precludes compliance with the study (Investigator discretion)
-
Co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the subject's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or that could impact the scientific integrity of the trial
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ohio State University Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 43210 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Renton, MD, Ohio State University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- OSU-09123
- NCI-2012-00604