Effectiveness of Kaltenborn Mobilizations Versus Muscle Energy Technique in Adhesive Capsulitis.

Sponsor
Health Education Research Foundation (HERF) (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05189626
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
3.8
7.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Total of 30 patients are selected according to inclusion criteria by convenient sampling and randomly allocated by sealed envelop method into two groups. Group 1 is treated with Muscle energy technique(Post isometric relaxation) and Group 2 is treated with Grade II,III Kaltenborn mobilizations and both groups also receives conventional therapy in form of Codman exercise and Wall ladder exercises.Data will be collected at baseline then after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks of intervention.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Muscle energy technique
  • Other: Kaltonborn mobilizations
N/A

Detailed Description

The purpose of study is to determine effectiveness of muscle energy techniques(Post Isometric relaxation) and Kaltenborn mobilizations and to compare the effectiveness of both techniques on pain and functional disability in patients with Adhesive capsulitis.Several studies about the effects of Maitland mobilizations and Muscle energy technique have been conducted. Evidence regarding the comparison of Kaltenborn mobilizatuons and post isometric relaxation is sparse. There has been no work regarding effectiveness of these two techniques in improving pain and functional disability in patients of Adhesive capsulitis.

Kaltonborn Mobilizations involves the application of a passive sustained stretch technique to enhance joint mobility without articular surface suppression. The forces applied to increase joint mobility are graded from I-III. Grade I applies a distraction of minor intensity that hardly causes stress within the joint capsule; it is often used to decrease pain. Grade II refers to a force that stretches the periarticular tissue; such stimulus is colloquially referred to as "taking up the slack." Finally, Grade III force causes enough distraction or gliding so that joint capsule can sufficiently stretch; it is often used for enhancing ROM.

MET is unique in its application as the client provides the initial effort while the practitioner facilitates the process. One of the main uses of this method is to normalize joint range, rather than increase flexibility, and techniques can be used on any joints with restricted Range of Motion (ROM) identified during the passive assessment. The main effects of MET can be explained by two distinct physiological processes: Post Isometric Relaxation (PIR) and Reciprocal Inhibition (RI). Post isometric contraction decrease muscle tone in single group of muscle after brief period of submaximal isometric contraction of same muscle.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
There are two groups Group 1 and 2.Group 1 is treated with Muscle energy techniques and Group 2 is treated with kaltenborn mobilizations for 30 minutes per session,3 days per week for 4 weeks.There are two groups Group 1 and 2.Group 1 is treated with Muscle energy techniques and Group 2 is treated with kaltenborn mobilizations for 30 minutes per session,3 days per week for 4 weeks.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Care Provider)
Masking Description:
It is a single blinded study.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effectiveness of Kaltenborn Mobilizations Versus Muscle Energy Technique in Adhesive Capsulitis.
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 6, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Group A

Muscle energy technique

Other: Muscle energy technique
Post Isometric relaxation(muscle energy technique) 3 days/ week for 4 weeks

Experimental: Group B

Kaltonborn mobilizations

Other: Kaltonborn mobilizations
Kaltonborn mobilizations grade II and III will be performed on Glenohumeral joints 3 days/ week for 4 weeks.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Shoulder pain and disability index [4 weeks]

    Shoulder pain and disability index is used to measure pain and functional disability level. Total scores range from 0 to 130 with a percentage score of 0 indicating less shoulder disability and 100 indicating more shoulder dysfunction

  2. Universal goniometer [4 weeks]

    universal goniometer is used to measure shoulder range of motion.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age between 20 and 60 years.

  • Duration of complaint for more than 3 months.

  • Gender: Both Male and Female.

  • Patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder

  • Patients having restriction in more than 2 ranges

  • Patients with diabetes

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Shoulder dislocation, fracture or labral tear.

  • Shoulder girdle motor control deficit associated with neurological disorder.

  • Any bony deformities acquired or congenital in glenohumeral joint.

  • Patients with language barrier.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Holy family hospital Rawalpindi Punjab Pakistan 4400

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Health Education Research Foundation (HERF)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aqsa Anwar, DPT, Rawalpindi Medical College

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Health Education Research Foundation (HERF)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05189626
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 142/IREF/RMU/2021
First Posted:
Jan 12, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jan 12, 2022
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Health Education Research Foundation (HERF)
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 12, 2022