RemivsDex: A Comparison of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine for Craniotomy Perioperative Hemodynamics and Postoperative Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This will be a randomized blinded clinical trial. Patients will be randomized to receive either a remifentanil or dexmedetomidine infusion for general anesthesia. The anesthesia team will know the result of randomization at induction. Data will be gathered by research personnel who will be blinded to the anesthetic method used. Patients will be blinded to the anesthetic they receive till they are discharged from the PACU when they will have the option to be unblinded. The Data Safety and -Toxicity Committee will review all serious adverse events and toxicity reports as well as annual reviews.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Anesthesia for craniotomy presents a unique challenge to the anesthesiologist. Anesthesia for neurosurgical procedures should provide optimal surgical conditions while maintaining appropriate cerebral oxygen supply and stable systemic hemodynamics. (1) It is important to prevent patient response to noxious stimuli during the procedure like pinning, drilling of the bone, opening and manipulation of the dura etc., avoid coughing and bucking during surgery and during extubation thus necessitating a deeper level of anesthesia and analgesia. At the same time it is desirable to have the patient fully awake toward the end of the surgery in order to facilitate neurologic evaluation. Management of the above presents a challenge during induction, maintenance and extubation and also during multiple critical stages of surgery Fear of the side effects of analgesic drugs frequently leads to the under-treatment of post-craniotomy pain. (2) Nevertheless, this pain continues to be commonly observed, is frequently severe, and, if unrelieved, may cause distress for the neurosurgical patient and serious complications for the operative brain. (2) There is a need for larger trials to delineate safety and efficacy of analgesic therapies with a focus on short- and long-term outcomes.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Remifentanil Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS |
Drug: Remifentanil
Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Drug: Dexmedetomidine
a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Hemodynamics [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]
Hemodynamics were defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP), measured in milimeters of mercury (mmHg). This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. In the outcome measure data table, mean ± standard deviation MAP was reported as the aggregate mean across time points.
- Postoperative Pain [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]
Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 is defined as no pain and 10 is defined as worst pain imaginable. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. In the outcome measure data table, mean ± standard deviation pain was reported as the aggregate mean across time points.
- Total Opioid Consumption [Initial 90 minutes of recover after surgery]
Total opioid consumption was defined as the sum of all opioid doses given within the first 90 minutes after surgery, converted to milligram morphine equivalents.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Heart Rate [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]
Heart rate was determined from the arterial catheter and measured as beats per minute. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.
- Modified Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]
The Modified Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) is a validated questionnaire that discriminates among mild, moderate, and severe cognitive deficits. SOMCT is based on 6 questions and produces a total score ranging from 0 (worst possible function) to 28 (best possible function). Scores > 20 are considered normal. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.
- Aldrete Score [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]
The Aldrete score measured level of sedation and fitness and is used to assess the appropriate departure time from the post anesthesia care unit. The score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates poor fitness (and such patients are transferred to the ICU), while 10 indicates good fitness. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.
- Nursing Workload Comparison [90 minutes after extubation]
To evaluate the nurses workload when either of the two drugs are given in terms Nursing Research Usage form's therapeutic index scoring system. This score ranges from 0 (minimal interventions and time spent by nurses on study patient) to 22 (maximum interventions and time spent by nurses on the study patient).
- Drug Stop Time to Open Eyes [Anesthesia drug stop time to open eyes. Time is measured continuously until patients eyes open, regardless of how long it takes.]
time until patient first opened their eyes, squeezed a hand, or wiggled their toes in response to verbal commands after surgery
- Drug Stop Time to Recall [Time between extubation until patients could say their names.]
Time between extubation until patients could say their names.
- Drug Stop Time to Fitness to Discharge [Anesthesia drug stop time to fitness to discharge. Time is measured continuously until fitness for discharge is reached, regardless of how long it takes.]
- End Case to Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge [End case to post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Time is measured continuously until PACU discharge, regardless of how long it takes.]
Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge time is the timing at which patients are discharged from the PACU. This outcome is the amount of time (minutes) from end case to PACU discharge.
- Postoperative Nausea [Whether patients had nausea or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.]
Indicator of whether patients had nausea or not
- Postoperative Vomitting [Whether patients had vomiting or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.]
Indicator of whether patients had postoperative vomiting.
- Postoperative Shivering [Whether patients had postoperative or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.]
Indicator of whether patients had postoperative shivering.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients who undergo general anesthesia for elective surgical excision of a brain tumor with following specifications:
-
Age: Older than 18
-
Primary and redo cases will be included
-
Duration of surgery not exceeding 6 hrs.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patient refusal
-
Emergency craniotomy
-
Morbid obesity
-
Uncontrolled hypertension - DBP more than 110
-
Cardiac conduction defects
-
Patients with chronic pain.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | 44195 |
2 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | 44195 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- The Cleveland Clinic
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shobana Rajan, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 10-1056
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 71 | 71 |
COMPLETED | 71 | 68 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 71 | 68 | 139 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
55
(14)
|
56
(14)
|
56
(14)
|
Gender (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
37
52.1%
|
33
48.5%
|
70
50.4%
|
Male |
34
47.9%
|
35
51.5%
|
69
49.6%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Hemodynamics |
---|---|
Description | Hemodynamics were defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP), measured in milimeters of mercury (mmHg). This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. In the outcome measure data table, mean ± standard deviation MAP was reported as the aggregate mean across time points. |
Time Frame | 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg] |
98
(11)
|
88
(12)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on MAP collapsed over time was estimated using a 1-tailed t test from a repeated measures ANOVA model. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | We used a noninferiority delta of 7.5 mmHg. If noninferiority was detected, we proceeded to test for superiority. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -13 to -5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on MAP collapsed over time was estimated using a 1-tailed t test from a repeated measures ANOVA model. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 97.5% -13 to -4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Postoperative Pain |
---|---|
Description | Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 is defined as no pain and 10 is defined as worst pain imaginable. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. In the outcome measure data table, mean ± standard deviation pain was reported as the aggregate mean across time points. |
Time Frame | 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
5.1
(2.4)
|
2.9
(2.6)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on VAS pain score estimated from a 1-tailed t test from a repeated measures ANOVA model. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | We used a noninferiority delta of 1 point. If noninferiority was detected, we proceeded to test for superiority. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -1.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -2.7 to -1.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on VAS pain score estimated from a 1-tailed t test from a repeated measures ANOVA model. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -1.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 97.5% -2.8 to -0.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Total Opioid Consumption |
---|---|
Description | Total opioid consumption was defined as the sum of all opioid doses given within the first 90 minutes after surgery, converted to milligram morphine equivalents. |
Time Frame | Initial 90 minutes of recover after surgery |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mg morphine equivalents] |
10
|
5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on opioid consumption estimated from a Wilcoxon rank sum test | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | Noninferiority delta = 2 mg opioid | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -10 to -5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on opioid consumption estimated from a Wilcoxon rank sum test | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 97.5% -10 to -3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Heart Rate |
---|---|
Description | Heart rate was determined from the arterial catheter and measured as beats per minute. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. |
Time Frame | 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Heart rate 15 minutes after extubation |
76
(15)
|
68
(13)
|
Heart rate 30 minutes after extubation |
72
(14)
|
67
(13)
|
Heart rate 45 minutes after extubation |
73
(14)
|
66
(13)
|
Heart rate 60 minutes after extubation |
73
(13)
|
66
(12)
|
Heart rate 90 minutes after extubation |
75
(13)
|
69
(14)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on heart rate was assessed using a linear mixed effects model adjusting for baseline heart rate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -10 to 3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Modified Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) |
---|---|
Description | The Modified Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) is a validated questionnaire that discriminates among mild, moderate, and severe cognitive deficits. SOMCT is based on 6 questions and produces a total score ranging from 0 (worst possible function) to 28 (best possible function). Scores > 20 are considered normal. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. |
Time Frame | 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
SOMCT 15 minutes after extubation |
22
(9)
|
18
(11)
|
SOMCT 30 minutes after extubation |
25
(7)
|
20
(11)
|
SOMCT 45 minutes after extubation |
25
(6)
|
23
(9)
|
SOMCT 60 minutes after extubation |
26
(5)
|
24
(7)
|
SOMCT 90 minutes after extubation |
26
(5)
|
25
(7)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on SOMCT estimated using a linear mixed effects model adjusting for baseline SOMCT score. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.16 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -1.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -2.6 to 0.5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Aldrete Score |
---|---|
Description | The Aldrete score measured level of sedation and fitness and is used to assess the appropriate departure time from the post anesthesia care unit. The score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates poor fitness (and such patients are transferred to the ICU), while 10 indicates good fitness. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. |
Time Frame | 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Aldrete score at 15 minutes after extubation |
8.4
(1)
|
8
(1.4)
|
Aldrete score at 30 minutes after extubation |
8.7
(1)
|
8.3
(1.4)
|
Aldrete score at 45 minutes after extubation |
9.0
(1.0)
|
8.7
(1.1)
|
Aldrete score at 60 minutes after extubation |
9.2
(0.9)
|
8.9
(1.1)
|
Aldrete score at 90 minutes after extubation |
9.4
(0.8)
|
9.1
(1.1)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on Aldrete score estimated using a linear mixed effects model adjusting for baseline Aldrete score. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.07 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.6 to 0.03 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Nursing Workload Comparison |
---|---|
Description | To evaluate the nurses workload when either of the two drugs are given in terms Nursing Research Usage form's therapeutic index scoring system. This score ranges from 0 (minimal interventions and time spent by nurses on study patient) to 22 (maximum interventions and time spent by nurses on the study patient). |
Time Frame | 90 minutes after extubation |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [units on a scale] |
6
|
5.5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on Nursing workload comparison estimated using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.009 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1 to -0.001 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Drug Stop Time to Open Eyes |
---|---|
Description | time until patient first opened their eyes, squeezed a hand, or wiggled their toes in response to verbal commands after surgery |
Time Frame | Anesthesia drug stop time to open eyes. Time is measured continuously until patients eyes open, regardless of how long it takes. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [minutes] |
8
|
38
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Remifentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine on time to open eyes estimated using Cox regression. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.11 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.07 to 0.18 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Drug Stop Time to Recall |
---|---|
Description | Time between extubation until patients could say their names. |
Time Frame | Time between extubation until patients could say their names. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [minutes] |
13
|
42
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Remifentanyl versus dexmedetomidine on time to recall assessed using Cox regression. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.12 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.07 to 0.19 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Drug Stop Time to Fitness to Discharge |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Anesthesia drug stop time to fitness to discharge. Time is measured continuously until fitness for discharge is reached, regardless of how long it takes. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [minutes] |
150
|
172
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Remifentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine on time to fitness discharge estimated using Cox regression. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.022 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.68 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.48 to 0.95 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | End Case to Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge |
---|---|
Description | Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge time is the timing at which patients are discharged from the PACU. This outcome is the amount of time (minutes) from end case to PACU discharge. |
Time Frame | End case to post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Time is measured continuously until PACU discharge, regardless of how long it takes. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 91 | 68 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [minutes] |
211
|
215
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Remifentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine on time to PACU discharge estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.45 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.81 to 1.62 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Postoperative Nausea |
---|---|
Description | Indicator of whether patients had nausea or not |
Time Frame | Whether patients had nausea or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Number [participants] |
12
16.9%
|
12
17.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on postoperative nausea estimated from chi squared test. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.91 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Ratio (RR) |
Estimated Value | 1.0 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.5 to 2.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Postoperative Vomitting |
---|---|
Description | Indicator of whether patients had postoperative vomiting. |
Time Frame | Whether patients had vomiting or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Number [participants] |
6
8.5%
|
2
2.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on postoperative vomiting estimated from a chi square test. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.16 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Ratio (RR) |
Estimated Value | 0.4 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.07 to 1.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Postoperative Shivering |
---|---|
Description | Indicator of whether patients had postoperative shivering. |
Time Frame | Whether patients had postoperative or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. |
Measure Participants | 71 | 68 |
Number [participants] |
7
9.9%
|
3
4.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on incidence of shivering estimated from a chi square test. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.21 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Ratio (RR) |
Estimated Value | 0.4 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.1 to 1.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine | ||
Arm/Group Description | Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS | a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/71 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Remifentanil | Dexmedetomidine | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/71 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Daniel Sessler, MD |
---|---|
Organization | Cleveland Clinic |
Phone | 216-445-6500 |
sesslerd@ccf.org |
- 10-1056