RemivsDex: A Comparison of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine for Craniotomy Perioperative Hemodynamics and Postoperative Pain

Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01269918
Collaborator
(none)
142
2
2
32
71
2.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This will be a randomized blinded clinical trial. Patients will be randomized to receive either a remifentanil or dexmedetomidine infusion for general anesthesia. The anesthesia team will know the result of randomization at induction. Data will be gathered by research personnel who will be blinded to the anesthetic method used. Patients will be blinded to the anesthetic they receive till they are discharged from the PACU when they will have the option to be unblinded. The Data Safety and -Toxicity Committee will review all serious adverse events and toxicity reports as well as annual reviews.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

Anesthesia for craniotomy presents a unique challenge to the anesthesiologist. Anesthesia for neurosurgical procedures should provide optimal surgical conditions while maintaining appropriate cerebral oxygen supply and stable systemic hemodynamics. (1) It is important to prevent patient response to noxious stimuli during the procedure like pinning, drilling of the bone, opening and manipulation of the dura etc., avoid coughing and bucking during surgery and during extubation thus necessitating a deeper level of anesthesia and analgesia. At the same time it is desirable to have the patient fully awake toward the end of the surgery in order to facilitate neurologic evaluation. Management of the above presents a challenge during induction, maintenance and extubation and also during multiple critical stages of surgery Fear of the side effects of analgesic drugs frequently leads to the under-treatment of post-craniotomy pain. (2) Nevertheless, this pain continues to be commonly observed, is frequently severe, and, if unrelieved, may cause distress for the neurosurgical patient and serious complications for the operative brain. (2) There is a need for larger trials to delineate safety and efficacy of analgesic therapies with a focus on short- and long-term outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
142 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Comparison of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine for Craniotomy Perioperative Hemodynamics and Postoperative Pain
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Remifentanil

Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS

Drug: Remifentanil
Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS
Other Names:
  • Ultiva, G187084B
  • Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine

    a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine
    a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Other Names:
  • Precedex, Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Hemodynamics [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]

      Hemodynamics were defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP), measured in milimeters of mercury (mmHg). This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. In the outcome measure data table, mean ± standard deviation MAP was reported as the aggregate mean across time points.

    2. Postoperative Pain [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]

      Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 is defined as no pain and 10 is defined as worst pain imaginable. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. In the outcome measure data table, mean ± standard deviation pain was reported as the aggregate mean across time points.

    3. Total Opioid Consumption [Initial 90 minutes of recover after surgery]

      Total opioid consumption was defined as the sum of all opioid doses given within the first 90 minutes after surgery, converted to milligram morphine equivalents.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Heart Rate [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]

      Heart rate was determined from the arterial catheter and measured as beats per minute. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.

    2. Modified Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]

      The Modified Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) is a validated questionnaire that discriminates among mild, moderate, and severe cognitive deficits. SOMCT is based on 6 questions and produces a total score ranging from 0 (worst possible function) to 28 (best possible function). Scores > 20 are considered normal. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.

    3. Aldrete Score [15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.]

      The Aldrete score measured level of sedation and fitness and is used to assess the appropriate departure time from the post anesthesia care unit. The score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates poor fitness (and such patients are transferred to the ICU), while 10 indicates good fitness. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.

    4. Nursing Workload Comparison [90 minutes after extubation]

      To evaluate the nurses workload when either of the two drugs are given in terms Nursing Research Usage form's therapeutic index scoring system. This score ranges from 0 (minimal interventions and time spent by nurses on study patient) to 22 (maximum interventions and time spent by nurses on the study patient).

    5. Drug Stop Time to Open Eyes [Anesthesia drug stop time to open eyes. Time is measured continuously until patients eyes open, regardless of how long it takes.]

      time until patient first opened their eyes, squeezed a hand, or wiggled their toes in response to verbal commands after surgery

    6. Drug Stop Time to Recall [Time between extubation until patients could say their names.]

      Time between extubation until patients could say their names.

    7. Drug Stop Time to Fitness to Discharge [Anesthesia drug stop time to fitness to discharge. Time is measured continuously until fitness for discharge is reached, regardless of how long it takes.]

    8. End Case to Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge [End case to post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Time is measured continuously until PACU discharge, regardless of how long it takes.]

      Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge time is the timing at which patients are discharged from the PACU. This outcome is the amount of time (minutes) from end case to PACU discharge.

    9. Postoperative Nausea [Whether patients had nausea or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.]

      Indicator of whether patients had nausea or not

    10. Postoperative Vomitting [Whether patients had vomiting or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.]

      Indicator of whether patients had postoperative vomiting.

    11. Postoperative Shivering [Whether patients had postoperative or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.]

      Indicator of whether patients had postoperative shivering.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:

    Patients who undergo general anesthesia for elective surgical excision of a brain tumor with following specifications:

    • Age: Older than 18

    • Primary and redo cases will be included

    • Duration of surgery not exceeding 6 hrs.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patient refusal

    • Emergency craniotomy

    • Morbid obesity

    • Uncontrolled hypertension - DBP more than 110

    • Cardiac conduction defects

    • Patients with chronic pain.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio United States 44195
    2 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio United States 44195

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • The Cleveland Clinic

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Shobana Rajan, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    The Cleveland Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01269918
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 10-1056
    First Posted:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 20, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2016
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Keywords provided by The Cleveland Clinic
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 71 71
    COMPLETED 71 68
    NOT COMPLETED 0 3

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine Total
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 71 68 139
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    55
    (14)
    56
    (14)
    56
    (14)
    Gender (Count of Participants)
    Female
    37
    52.1%
    33
    48.5%
    70
    50.4%
    Male
    34
    47.9%
    35
    51.5%
    69
    49.6%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Hemodynamics
    Description Hemodynamics were defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP), measured in milimeters of mercury (mmHg). This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. In the outcome measure data table, mean ± standard deviation MAP was reported as the aggregate mean across time points.
    Time Frame 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg]
    98
    (11)
    88
    (12)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on MAP collapsed over time was estimated using a 1-tailed t test from a repeated measures ANOVA model.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments We used a noninferiority delta of 7.5 mmHg. If noninferiority was detected, we proceeded to test for superiority.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -13 to -5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on MAP collapsed over time was estimated using a 1-tailed t test from a repeated measures ANOVA model.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
    -13 to -4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Postoperative Pain
    Description Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 is defined as no pain and 10 is defined as worst pain imaginable. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach. In the outcome measure data table, mean ± standard deviation pain was reported as the aggregate mean across time points.
    Time Frame 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    5.1
    (2.4)
    2.9
    (2.6)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on VAS pain score estimated from a 1-tailed t test from a repeated measures ANOVA model.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments We used a noninferiority delta of 1 point. If noninferiority was detected, we proceeded to test for superiority.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -1.9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.7 to -1.1
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on VAS pain score estimated from a 1-tailed t test from a repeated measures ANOVA model.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -1.9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
    -2.8 to -0.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title Total Opioid Consumption
    Description Total opioid consumption was defined as the sum of all opioid doses given within the first 90 minutes after surgery, converted to milligram morphine equivalents.
    Time Frame Initial 90 minutes of recover after surgery

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mg morphine equivalents]
    10
    5
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on opioid consumption estimated from a Wilcoxon rank sum test
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments Noninferiority delta = 2 mg opioid
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -10 to -5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on opioid consumption estimated from a Wilcoxon rank sum test
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
    -10 to -3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Heart Rate
    Description Heart rate was determined from the arterial catheter and measured as beats per minute. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.
    Time Frame 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Heart rate 15 minutes after extubation
    76
    (15)
    68
    (13)
    Heart rate 30 minutes after extubation
    72
    (14)
    67
    (13)
    Heart rate 45 minutes after extubation
    73
    (14)
    66
    (13)
    Heart rate 60 minutes after extubation
    73
    (13)
    66
    (12)
    Heart rate 90 minutes after extubation
    75
    (13)
    69
    (14)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on heart rate was assessed using a linear mixed effects model adjusting for baseline heart rate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -6
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -10 to 3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Modified Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT)
    Description The Modified Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) is a validated questionnaire that discriminates among mild, moderate, and severe cognitive deficits. SOMCT is based on 6 questions and produces a total score ranging from 0 (worst possible function) to 28 (best possible function). Scores > 20 are considered normal. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.
    Time Frame 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    SOMCT 15 minutes after extubation
    22
    (9)
    18
    (11)
    SOMCT 30 minutes after extubation
    25
    (7)
    20
    (11)
    SOMCT 45 minutes after extubation
    25
    (6)
    23
    (9)
    SOMCT 60 minutes after extubation
    26
    (5)
    24
    (7)
    SOMCT 90 minutes after extubation
    26
    (5)
    25
    (7)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on SOMCT estimated using a linear mixed effects model adjusting for baseline SOMCT score.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.16
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -1.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.6 to 0.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Aldrete Score
    Description The Aldrete score measured level of sedation and fitness and is used to assess the appropriate departure time from the post anesthesia care unit. The score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates poor fitness (and such patients are transferred to the ICU), while 10 indicates good fitness. This outcome was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA approach.
    Time Frame 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after extubation.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Aldrete score at 15 minutes after extubation
    8.4
    (1)
    8
    (1.4)
    Aldrete score at 30 minutes after extubation
    8.7
    (1)
    8.3
    (1.4)
    Aldrete score at 45 minutes after extubation
    9.0
    (1.0)
    8.7
    (1.1)
    Aldrete score at 60 minutes after extubation
    9.2
    (0.9)
    8.9
    (1.1)
    Aldrete score at 90 minutes after extubation
    9.4
    (0.8)
    9.1
    (1.1)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on Aldrete score estimated using a linear mixed effects model adjusting for baseline Aldrete score.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.07
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -0.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.6 to 0.03
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Nursing Workload Comparison
    Description To evaluate the nurses workload when either of the two drugs are given in terms Nursing Research Usage form's therapeutic index scoring system. This score ranges from 0 (minimal interventions and time spent by nurses on study patient) to 22 (maximum interventions and time spent by nurses on the study patient).
    Time Frame 90 minutes after extubation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [units on a scale]
    6
    5.5
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on Nursing workload comparison estimated using a Wilcoxon rank sum test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.009
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1 to -0.001
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Drug Stop Time to Open Eyes
    Description time until patient first opened their eyes, squeezed a hand, or wiggled their toes in response to verbal commands after surgery
    Time Frame Anesthesia drug stop time to open eyes. Time is measured continuously until patients eyes open, regardless of how long it takes.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [minutes]
    8
    38
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Remifentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine on time to open eyes estimated using Cox regression.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Cox
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.11
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.07 to 0.18
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Drug Stop Time to Recall
    Description Time between extubation until patients could say their names.
    Time Frame Time between extubation until patients could say their names.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [minutes]
    13
    42
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Remifentanyl versus dexmedetomidine on time to recall assessed using Cox regression.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Cox
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.12
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.07 to 0.19
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Drug Stop Time to Fitness to Discharge
    Description
    Time Frame Anesthesia drug stop time to fitness to discharge. Time is measured continuously until fitness for discharge is reached, regardless of how long it takes.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [minutes]
    150
    172
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Remifentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine on time to fitness discharge estimated using Cox regression.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.022
    Comments
    Method Regression, Cox
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.68
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.48 to 0.95
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title End Case to Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge
    Description Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge time is the timing at which patients are discharged from the PACU. This outcome is the amount of time (minutes) from end case to PACU discharge.
    Time Frame End case to post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Time is measured continuously until PACU discharge, regardless of how long it takes.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 91 68
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [minutes]
    211
    215
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Remifentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine on time to PACU discharge estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.45
    Comments
    Method Regression, Cox
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.81 to 1.62
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Postoperative Nausea
    Description Indicator of whether patients had nausea or not
    Time Frame Whether patients had nausea or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Number [participants]
    12
    16.9%
    12
    17.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on postoperative nausea estimated from chi squared test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.91
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
    Estimated Value 1.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.5 to 2.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Postoperative Vomitting
    Description Indicator of whether patients had postoperative vomiting.
    Time Frame Whether patients had vomiting or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Number [participants]
    6
    8.5%
    2
    2.9%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on postoperative vomiting estimated from a chi square test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.16
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
    Estimated Value 0.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.07 to 1.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Postoperative Shivering
    Description Indicator of whether patients had postoperative shivering.
    Time Frame Whether patients had postoperative or not, from anesthesia stop time until hospital discharge.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    Measure Participants 71 68
    Number [participants]
    7
    9.9%
    3
    4.4%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine
    Comments Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanyl on incidence of shivering estimated from a chi square test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.21
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
    Estimated Value 0.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.1 to 1.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Arm/Group Description Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS Remifentanil: Remifentanil 0.08-0.15MCG/KG/MIN INFUSION THROUGHOUT PROCEDURE BASED ON HEMODYNAMICS a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour. Dexmedetomidine: a loading dose of dexmedetomidine was given at 0.5 to 1 micrograms/kg ideal body weight over 15 minutes, followed by an infusion at 0.2 to 0.7 micrograms/kg/hour.
    All Cause Mortality
    Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/71 (0%) 0/68 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Remifentanil Dexmedetomidine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/71 (0%) 0/68 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Daniel Sessler, MD
    Organization Cleveland Clinic
    Phone 216-445-6500
    Email sesslerd@ccf.org
    Responsible Party:
    The Cleveland Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01269918
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 10-1056
    First Posted:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 20, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2016