Safety, Feasibility and Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplementation in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer (SAFE-D)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Background: Several clinical trials are underway to investigate if variable forms of vitamin D (D2 vs. D3) prescribed at different doses (10,000-50,000 IUs/week) can improve the side-effects associated with treatment for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, specifically aromatase inhibitors (AIs.) Presumably for generalizability and potential safety purposes, these trials predominantly exclude women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC); a rapidly expanding sector of the cancer survivor population who experience significant treatment-related side-effects. Evaluation of the safety of vitamin D3 supplementation is crucial since supplementation can lead to high calcium and importantly, in lab studies have shown that vitamin D3 affects a gene that increases estrogen production. To assure that vitamin D3 does not affect the clinical effects of anti-estrogen therapies, the effect of vitamin D3 supplements on estrogen production requires an evaluation that further explores and defines its potential role in symptom management for this population.
Objectives: This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of vitamin D3 supplementation in women with MBC, providing much needed data on the preliminary safety and efficacy of this treatment in this patient population. This study will determine: 1) if weekly supplementation of high dose vitamin D3 increases serum vitamin D levels without adverse effects related to such therapy (primary aim); 2) the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on symptom management (secondary aim); and 3) if vitamin D3 supplementation is associated with improved inflammation (exploratory aim.)
Methods: This is an 8 week "proof of concept" study to monitor laboratory parameters and to assess potential effects on short-term outcomes. Adult, female patients (>=18 years) with ER+ MBC (Stage IV) of any race/ethnicity and a history of vitamin D < 30 mg/dl will be recruited from within and around LUMC. Following current clinical practice guidelines, eligible participants will receive 50,000 IUs of vitamin D3 weekly for 8 weeks. Laboratory values, muscle function and inflammation will be examined pre- and post-supplementation, while symptoms will be assessed at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks post-supplementation. We will assess if increases in vitamin D are associated with clinically significant improvements in symptoms and QOL, and decreased inflammation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Study Aims
Several clinical trials are underway to investigate if vitamin D2 or D3 provided at various doses (10,000-50,000 IUs/week) can improve the side-effects associated with anti-estrogen therapies, specifically aromatase inhibitors (AIs). However, these current trials use variable forms of vitamin D and predominantly include women with Stage I-III disease, excluding women with metastatic breast cancer. Evaluation of the safety of vitamin D3 supplementation is crucial since supplementation can lead to hypercalcemia and importantly, in vitro studies have shown that vitamin D3 influences the transcription of a gene that increases estrogen production.27,28 To assure that vitamin D3 does not abrogate the clinical effects of anti-estrogen therapies, the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on estrogen production requires evaluation. Therefore, the overarching goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation in women with
MBC. We will address and test the following aims and hypotheses, respectively:
Aim 1: To determine if weekly supplementation of 50,000 IUs of vitamin D3 raises serum levels of 25(OH)D to >30 mg/dl without adverse effects.
Hypothesis 1: Women who are compliant with vitamin D3 supplementation, as evidenced by normalization (>30 mg/dl) or increases in their serum 25(OH)D levels, will not experience significant changes in serum calcium, parathyroid hormone or serum estradiol levels.
Aim 2: To determine the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on symptom management.
Hypothesis 2: Women who achieve serum concentrations of 25 (OH)D ≥30 mg/dl or experience significant increases in 25(OH)D will exhibit improvements in pain, fatigue, sleep, mood, muscle function and overall quality of life.
Exploratory Aim: To explore the mechanistic effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on inflammatory markers and its potential association with symptom management.
Summary: Evidence from studies involving early stage breast cancer participants confirms that musculoskeletal pain, endocrine related symptoms and mood disturbances are commonly associated with breast cancer treatment, particularly hormone deprivation therapies. The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency among breast cancer survivors is well accepted and further hypothesized to aggravate treatment-related side effects, particularly arthralgias. Women with MBC are excluded from the majority of on-going vitamin D supplementation trials for safety and generalizability purposes. However, novel therapies are continuing to improve and prolong the lives of these women, resulting in a rapidly expansive group of breast cancer survivors. While vitamin D supplementation is prescribed to correct an underlying nutrient deficiency in the clinical context of preserving bone health, emerging evidence suggests it may have more systemic effects. Thus, vitamin D repletion/supplementation has profound potential implications for women with MBC, whose primary goal of treatment is to minimize the side-effects of treatment in support of optimal quality of life. This study reflects a highly innovative, yet simple therapy that could ultimately provide these survivors with a much needed evidence-based supportive care strategies.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cholecalciferol All participants will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. |
Drug: Cholecalciferol
Enrolled women will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Vitamin D sufficient All participants were ineligible for the intervention due to sufficient serum 25(OH)D levels at screening/baseline. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Serum 25(OH)D [0, 8 weeks]
Change in laboratory serum value of 25(OH)D at 8 weeks post-supplementation for participants who received weekly supplementation of 50,000 IUs of vitamin D3. Change is expressed as laboratory serum value of 25(OH)D at 8 weeks minus baseline. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in Worst Pain Rating From the Beck Pain Scale [0, 8 weeks]
Assessment of pain using the Beck Pain Scale at weeks 0 and 8. This is a Likert scale item where a score of 0 corresponds to no pain and a score of 10 corresponds to worst pain. Change is calculated as the worst pain rating at 8 weeks minus the worst pain rating at 0 weeks.Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time.
- Change in Fatigue [0, 8 weeks]
Assessment of fatigue using the Piper Fatigue Scale at weeks 0 and 8. The Piper Fatigue Scale is the average of 22 numeric items, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue [range of scores: 0-10]. Change is calculated as the fatigue score at 8 weeks minus fatigue score at 0 weeks. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time.
- Change in Mood [0, 8 weeks]
Assessment of mood using the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) at weeks 0 and 8. The PHQ-8 ranges from 0-24 with higher scores indicating more distress. Change was assessed as PHQ-8 score at 8 weeks minus 0 weeks. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time.
- Change in Muscle Function [0, 8 weeks]
Assessment of muscle function using a hand dynamometer at weeks 0 and 8. Change in dominant handgrip strength in kilograms was calculated as 8 weeks minus 0 weeks. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time.
- Change in Sleep Quality Assessment [0, 8 weeks]
Assessment of sleep using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at weeks 0 and 8. Scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Change was calculated as week 8 minus week 0 PSQI. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time.
- Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-breast [0, 8 weeks]
Assessment of quality of life using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast symptoms at weeks 0 and 8. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change was calculated as week 8 score minus week 0 score. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time.
- Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-endocrine [0, 8 weeks]
Assessment of quality of life using the functional assessment of cancer therapy- endocrine symptoms at weeks 0 and 8. Scores range from 0-76 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Metastatic breast cancer (Stage IV)
-
Histologically confirmed estrogen receptor positive disease
-
Female
-
Serum 25(OH) <30 ng/ml
-
Age ≥ 18 years
-
Pre or post-menopausal
-
ECOG Performance status 0-2
-
Adequate organ function as defined as GFR> 30 mls/min and serum calcium ≤ 10.4 mg/dl
-
Any race/ethnicity
-
English speaking
-
No changes to MBC treatments within 30 days of enrollment and/or deemed clinically stable by their treating physician
-
Willingness to sign a written informed consent and complete questionnaires
-
Cease ingestion of vitamin D supplementation not study related
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Women with Stage I-III breast cancer
-
Serum 25(OH)D levels ≥ 30 ng/ml
-
Untreated CNS involvement
-
History of kidney stones
-
History of renal failure
-
History of hyperparathyroidism
-
History of hypersensitivity to vitamin D
-
Non-English speaking
-
Currently pregnant or lactating, or anticipating pregnancy
-
Unwilling to cease ingestion of calcium supplements (>1000 mg/d)
-
Unwilling or unable to complete informed consent or study questionnaires
-
Psychiatric or other clinical conditions that preclude study compliance
-
Other important medical or safety considerations at the discretion of the investigator and/or study physician, including non-compliance with the study therapy or other activities
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Loyola University Medical Center | Maywood | Illinois | United States | 60153 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Loyola University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Patricia M Sheean, Ph.D., R.D., Loyola University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Amir E, Simmons CE, Freedman OC, Dranitsaris G, Cole DE, Vieth R, Ooi WS, Clemons M. A phase 2 trial exploring the effects of high-dose (10,000 IU/day) vitamin D(3) in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;116(2):284-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24749.
- Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):974-86.
- Carpenter JS, Andrykowski MA. Psychometric evaluation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. J Psychosom Res. 1998 Jul;45(1):5-13.
- Castel LD, Hartmann KE, Mayer IA, Saville BR, Alvarez J, Boomershine CS, Abramson VG, Chakravarthy AB, Friedman DL, Cella DF. Time course of arthralgia among women initiating aromatase inhibitor therapy and a postmenopausal comparison group in a prospective cohort. Cancer. 2013 Jul 1;119(13):2375-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28016. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
- Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38. Review.
- Cummings SR, Block G, McHenry K, Baron RB. Evaluation of two food frequency methods of measuring dietary calcium intake. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Nov;126(5):796-802.
- Din OS, Dodwell D, Wakefield RJ, Coleman RE. Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in early breast cancer: what do we know and how can we find out more? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Apr;120(3):525-38. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0757-7. Epub 2010 Feb 16. Review.
- Eastell R, Adams JE, Coleman RE, Howell A, Hannon RA, Cuzick J, Mackey JR, Beckmann MW, Clack G. Effect of anastrozole on bone mineral density: 5-year results from the anastrozole, tamoxifen, alone or in combination trial 18233230. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;26(7):1051-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0726.
- Enjuanes A, Garcia-Giralt N, Supervia A, Nogués X, Mellibovsky L, Carbonell J, Grinberg D, Balcells S, Díez-Pérez A. Regulation of CYP19 gene expression in primary human osteoblasts: effects of vitamin D and other treatments. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003 May;148(5):519-26.
- Fallowfield LJ, Leaity SK, Howell A, Benson S, Cella D. Assessment of quality of life in women undergoing hormonal therapy for breast cancer: validation of an endocrine symptom subscale for the FACT-B. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999 May;55(2):189-99.
- Giulietti A, van Etten E, Overbergh L, Stoffels K, Bouillon R, Mathieu C. Monocytes from type 2 diabetic patients have a pro-inflammatory profile. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) works as anti-inflammatory. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007 Jul;77(1):47-57. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
- Glanz K, Yaroch AL, Dancel M, Saraiya M, Crane LA, Buller DB, Manne S, O'Riordan DL, Heckman CJ, Hay J, Robinson JK. Measures of sun exposure and sun protection practices for behavioral and epidemiologic research. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Feb;144(2):217-22. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.46.
- Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
- Gonnelli S, Cadirni A, Caffarelli C, Petrioli R, Montagnani A, Franci MB, Lucani B, Francini G, Nuti R. Changes in bone turnover and in bone mass in women with breast cancer switched from tamoxifen to exemestane. Bone. 2007 Jan;40(1):205-10. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
- Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Koo J, Hood N. Prognostic effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3757-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0725. Epub 2009 May 18.
- Herrmann C. International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale--a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jan;42(1):17-41. Review.
- Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM; Endocrine Society. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):1911-30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. Epub 2011 Jun 6. Erratum in: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Dec;96(12):3908.
- Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 19;357(3):266-81. Review.
- Irvin W Jr, Muss HB, Mayer DK. Symptom management in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(9):1203-14. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0159. Epub 2011 Aug 31. Review.
- Islander U, Jochems C, Lagerquist MK, Forsblad-d'Elia H, Carlsten H. Estrogens in rheumatoid arthritis; the immune system and bone. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011 Mar 15;335(1):14-29. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2010.05.018. Epub 2010 Jun 8. Review.
- Johnson RH, Chien FL, Bleyer A. Incidence of breast cancer with distant involvement among women in the United States, 1976 to 2009. JAMA. 2013 Feb 27;309(8):800-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.776. Erratum in: JAMA. 2013 Mar 27;309(12):1229.
- Krishnan AV, Swami S, Peng L, Wang J, Moreno J, Feldman D. Tissue-selective regulation of aromatase expression by calcitriol: implications for breast cancer therapy. Endocrinology. 2010 Jan;151(1):32-42. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0855. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13.
- Lønning PE, Geisler J, Krag LE, Erikstein B, Bremnes Y, Hagen AI, Schlichting E, Lien EA, Ofjord ES, Paolini J, Polli A, Massimini G. Effects of exemestane administered for 2 years versus placebo on bone mineral density, bone biomarkers, and plasma lipids in patients with surgically resected early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5126-37. Epub 2005 Jun 27.
- May E, Asadullah K, Zügel U. Immunoregulation through 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its analogs. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2004 Dec;3(4):377-93. Review.
- Napoli N, Vattikuti S, Ma C, Rastelli A, Rayani A, Donepudi R, Asadfard M, Yarramaneni J, Ellis M, Armamento-Villareal R. High prevalence of low vitamin D and musculoskeletal complaints in women with breast cancer. Breast J. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):609-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01012.x.
- Neuhouser ML, Sorensen B, Hollis BW, Ambs A, Ulrich CM, McTiernan A, Bernstein L, Wayne S, Gilliland F, Baumgartner K, Baumgartner R, Ballard-Barbash R. Vitamin D insufficiency in a multiethnic cohort of breast cancer survivors. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jul;88(1):133-9.
- Niravath P. Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia: a review. Ann Oncol. 2013 Jun;24(6):1443-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt037. Epub 2013 Mar 6. Review.
- Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55.
- Penckofer S, Kouba J, Byrn M, Estwing Ferrans C. Vitamin D and depression: where is all the sunshine? Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Jun;31(6):385-93. doi: 10.3109/01612840903437657.
- Peterson CA, Heffernan ME. Serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations are negatively correlated with serum 25(OH)D concentrations in healthy women. J Inflamm (Lond). 2008 Jul 24;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-5-10.
- Piper BF, Dibble SL, Dodd MJ, Weiss MC, Slaughter RE, Paul SM. The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 May;25(4):677-84.
- Rantanen T, Era P, Heikkinen E. Maximal isometric strength and mobility among 75-year-old men and women. Age Ageing. 1994 Mar;23(2):132-7.
- Rantanen T, Volpato S, Ferrucci L, Heikkinen E, Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Handgrip strength and cause-specific and total mortality in older disabled women: exploring the mechanism. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 May;51(5):636-41.
- Reed E, Simmonds P, Haviland J, Corner J. Quality of life and experience of care in women with metastatic breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Apr;43(4):747-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
- Rose AA, Elser C, Ennis M, Goodwin PJ. Blood levels of vitamin D and early stage breast cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Oct;141(3):331-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2713-9. Epub 2013 Oct 9. Review.
- Schleithoff SS, Zittermann A, Tenderich G, Berthold HK, Stehle P, Koerfer R. Vitamin D supplementation improves cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;83(4):754-9.
- Shao T, Klein P, Grossbard ML. Vitamin D and breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17(1):36-45. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0278. Epub 2012 Jan 10. Review.
- Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705-14.
- Simmons C, Amir E, Dranitsaris G, Clemons M, Wong B, Veith R, Cole DE. Altered calcium metabolism in patients on long-term bisphosphonate therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009 Jul;29(7):2707-11.
- Soares MJ, Murhadi LL, Kurpad AV, Chan She Ping-Delfos WL, Piers LS. Mechanistic roles for calcium and vitamin D in the regulation of body weight. Obes Rev. 2012 Jul;13(7):592-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.00986.x. Epub 2012 Mar 2. Review.
- Trukova KP, Grutsch J, Lammersfeld C, Liepa G. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency among breast cancer survivors. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;27(1):122-8. doi: 10.1177/0884533611431461. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
- Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995 Jan 4;273(1):59-65.
- 206519
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were recruited from a single cancer center and required to be: 1) >18 years of age, 2) English speaking, 3) at a performance status of 0-2, 4) receiving treatment for histologically confirmed ER+ metastatic BC, and 5) clinically stable as judged by their medical oncologist. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. Cholecalciferol: Enrolled women will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 11 | 31 |
COMPLETED | 10 | 31 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D less than 30 ng/ml received 50,000 IUs weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 11 | 31 | 42 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
10
90.9%
|
20
64.5%
|
30
71.4%
|
>=65 years |
1
9.1%
|
11
35.5%
|
12
28.6%
|
Age (years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [years] |
57
|
63
|
62
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
11
100%
|
31
100%
|
42
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
Non-Hispanic White |
5
45.5%
|
26
83.9%
|
31
73.8%
|
Black |
4
36.4%
|
0
0%
|
4
9.5%
|
Hispanic |
2
18.2%
|
4
12.9%
|
6
14.3%
|
Other |
0
0%
|
1
3.2%
|
1
2.4%
|
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |||
United States |
11
100%
|
31
100%
|
42
100%
|
Employment status (Count of Participants) | |||
Paid full- or part-time work |
6
54.5%
|
12
38.7%
|
18
42.9%
|
Retired without disability |
1
9.1%
|
12
38.7%
|
13
31%
|
Retired with disability |
2
18.2%
|
6
19.4%
|
8
19%
|
Unemployed |
2
18.2%
|
1
3.2%
|
3
7.1%
|
Body mass index (kg/m^2) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [kg/m^2] |
27.3
|
27.8
|
27.5
|
Stage IV at diagnosis (Count of Participants) | |||
Yes |
4
36.4%
|
8
25.8%
|
12
28.6%
|
No |
7
63.6%
|
23
74.2%
|
30
71.4%
|
Duration of metastatic breast cancer (months) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [months] |
7
|
19
|
13
|
Metastatic sites (Count of Participants) | |||
1 or 2 |
9
81.8%
|
25
80.6%
|
34
81%
|
Greater than 2 |
2
18.2%
|
6
19.4%
|
8
19%
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Count of Participants) | |||
0 |
5
45.5%
|
11
35.5%
|
16
38.1%
|
1 |
6
54.5%
|
19
61.3%
|
25
59.5%
|
2 |
0
0%
|
1
3.2%
|
1
2.4%
|
Radiation therapy for metastates (Count of Participants) | |||
Yes |
3
27.3%
|
10
32.3%
|
13
31%
|
No |
8
72.7%
|
21
67.7%
|
29
69%
|
Surgery for breast cancer (Count of Participants) | |||
None |
6
54.5%
|
5
16.1%
|
11
26.2%
|
Lumpectomy |
4
36.4%
|
14
45.2%
|
18
42.9%
|
Mastectomy |
1
9.1%
|
12
38.7%
|
13
31%
|
Serum 25(OH)D (ng/ml) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [ng/ml] |
17
|
38
|
34
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in Serum 25(OH)D |
---|---|
Description | Change in laboratory serum value of 25(OH)D at 8 weeks post-supplementation for participants who received weekly supplementation of 50,000 IUs of vitamin D3. Change is expressed as laboratory serum value of 25(OH)D at 8 weeks minus baseline. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time. |
Time Frame | 0, 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant who initiated supplementation of cholecalciferol did not have laboratory serum value of 25(OH)D at week 8. Follow up laboratory and/or questionnaire data were not collected for women in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Enrolled women received 50,000 IUs weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [ng/ml] |
32
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is 0 change in serum 25(OH)D from week 0 to week 8. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | A Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.01 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon signed rank test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Worst Pain Rating From the Beck Pain Scale |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of pain using the Beck Pain Scale at weeks 0 and 8. This is a Likert scale item where a score of 0 corresponds to no pain and a score of 10 corresponds to worst pain. Change is calculated as the worst pain rating at 8 weeks minus the worst pain rating at 0 weeks.Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time. |
Time Frame | 0, 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant who initiated supplementation of cholecalciferol did not have laboratory serum value of 25(OH)D at week 8. Follow up laboratory and/or questionnaire data were not collected for women in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. Cholecalciferol: Enrolled women will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is 0 change in worst pain rating from week 0 to week 8. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | A Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.24 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon signed rank test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Fatigue |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of fatigue using the Piper Fatigue Scale at weeks 0 and 8. The Piper Fatigue Scale is the average of 22 numeric items, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue [range of scores: 0-10]. Change is calculated as the fatigue score at 8 weeks minus fatigue score at 0 weeks. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time. |
Time Frame | 0, 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant who initiated supplementation of cholecalciferol did not have assessment of fatigue at week 8. Follow up laboratory and/or questionnaire data were not collected for women in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Enrolled women received 50,000 IUs weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [units on a scale] |
-0.5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is 0 change in fatigue score from week 0 to week 8. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.09 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon signed rank test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Mood |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of mood using the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) at weeks 0 and 8. The PHQ-8 ranges from 0-24 with higher scores indicating more distress. Change was assessed as PHQ-8 score at 8 weeks minus 0 weeks. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time. |
Time Frame | 0, 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant who initiated supplementation of cholecalciferol did not have assessment of mood at 8 weeks. Follow up laboratory and/or questionnaire data were not collected for women in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. Cholecalciferol: Enrolled women will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
-1
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is 0 change in mood score from week 0 to week 8. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.17 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon signed rank test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Muscle Function |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of muscle function using a hand dynamometer at weeks 0 and 8. Change in dominant handgrip strength in kilograms was calculated as 8 weeks minus 0 weeks. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time. |
Time Frame | 0, 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant who initiated supplementation of cholecalciferol did not have hand dynamometer data at 8 weeks. Follow up laboratory and/or questionnaire data were not collected for women in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. Cholecalciferol: Enrolled women will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [kilograms] |
-0.2
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is 0 change in dominant handgrip strength from week 0 to week 8. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.50 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon signed rank test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Sleep Quality Assessment |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of sleep using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at weeks 0 and 8. Scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Change was calculated as week 8 minus week 0 PSQI. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time. |
Time Frame | 0, 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant who initiated supplementation of cholecalciferol did report the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at week 8. Follow up laboratory and/or questionnaire data were not collected for women in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. Cholecalciferol: Enrolled women will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
-1
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is 0 change in sleep quality assessment from week 0 to week 8. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.16 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon signed rank test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-breast |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of quality of life using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast symptoms at weeks 0 and 8. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change was calculated as week 8 score minus week 0 score. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time. |
Time Frame | 0, 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant who initiated supplementation of cholecalciferol did not have the Functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast at 8 weeks. Follow up laboratory and/or questionnaire data were not collected for women in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. Cholecalciferol: Enrolled women will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is 0 change in functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast score from week 0 to week 8. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.75 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon signed rank test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-endocrine |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of quality of life using the functional assessment of cancer therapy- endocrine symptoms at weeks 0 and 8. Scores range from 0-76 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change was not assessed for participants in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm since they did not receive weekly supplementation and were not followed over time. |
Time Frame | 0, 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant who initiated supplementation of cholecalciferol did not have the Functional assessment of cancer therapy-endocrine at 8 weeks. Follow up laboratory and/or questionnaire data were not collected for women in the 'no cholecalciferol' arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Cholecalciferol | No Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. Cholecalciferol: Enrolled women will receive 50,000 IU weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks. | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [score on a scale] |
9
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cholecalciferol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is 0 change in functional assessment of cancer therapy-endocrine score from week 0 to week 8. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.19 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon signed rank test | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 8 weeks | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Intervention | No Intervention | ||
Arm/Group Description | Enrolled women with serum 25 (OH)D less than 30 ng/ml received 50,000 IUs weekly supplementation of cholecalciferol for 8 weeks | Enrolled women without serum 25 (OH)D greater than or equal to 30 ng/ml received no intervention. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Intervention | No Intervention | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/11 (0%) | 0/31 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Intervention | No Intervention | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/11 (0%) | 0/31 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Intervention | No Intervention | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/11 (27.3%) | 0/31 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Nausea | 3/11 (27.3%) | 3 | 0/31 (0%) | 3 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Upper respiratory infection | 2/11 (18.2%) | 2 | 0/31 (0%) | 2 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Patricia Sheean |
---|---|
Organization | Loyola University Chicago |
Phone | 708-216-0344 |
psheean1@luc.edu |
- 206519