ZVF: The Zeaxanthin and Visual Function Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate if supplementation of zeaxanthin (with or without Lutein) is beneficial to patients with early and moderate Atrophic Age Related Macular Degeneration.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
To evaluate whether or not zeaxanthin supplementation raises macular pigment optical density (MPOD). Previous research has shown MPOD to mirror visual benefits for patients with age related atrophic macular degeneration (AMD) having visual symptoms (decreased visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, photostress glare recovery and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 scores), but lower risk National Eye Institute (NEI) / Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) characteristics.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Lutein 9 mg of Lutein for 12 months |
Dietary Supplement: Lutein
9 mg of Lutein during 12 months
|
Active Comparator: Zeaxanthin and Lutein 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Dietary Supplement: Lutein and Zeaxanthin
8 mg of lutein and 8 mg of Zeaxanthin administered during 12 months
|
Active Comparator: Zeaxanthin 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Drug: 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin
8 mg per day during 12 months
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Macular Pigment Optical Density [4 months]
Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).
- Macular Pigment Optical Density [8 months]
Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).
- Macular Pigment Optical Density [12 months]
Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering light emitting diodes and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- SHAPE Discrimination [12 months]
We determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation.
- Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity [12 months]
Black and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed.
- Glare Recovery [12 Months]
Photostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan).
- Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance [12 Months]
Distance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units.
- 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold [12 months]
The ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold.
- 100% Kinetic Field [12 Months]
Scotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
diagnosis of atrophic AMD (ICD9 362.51) by stereo bio-ophthalmoscopy and at least one vision degrading visual-psychophysical abnormality associated with AMD in one or both eyes.
-
clear non-lenticular ocular media (cornea, aqueous and vitreous)
-
free of advanced glaucoma and diabetes or any other ocular or systemic disease that could affect central or parafoveal macula visual function
Exclusion Criteria:
-
high risk retinal characteristics for advanced AMD or advanced AMD for which existing medical / surgical options are available
-
presence of ophthalmologically significant active exudative, AMD pathology by fluorescein angiography but also a single large drusen, >15, multiple intermediate drusen, parafoveal geographic atrophy or loss of vision in one eye due to advanced AMD
-
recent (within 6 months) cataract or retinal surgery
-
taking photosensitizing drugs such as phenothiazines and chloroquine
-
having taken lutein or zeaxanthin supplements within the past six months.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Chicago VA Medical Center | North Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60064 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Chrysantis, Inc.
- Kowa Company, Ltd.
- IMAGE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stuart Richer, Ph. D., North Chicago VA Medical Center
- Study Director: William Stiles, M.D., North Chicago VA Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Akbaraly NT, Faure H, Gourlet V, Favier A, Berr C. Plasma carotenoid levels and cognitive performance in an elderly population: results of the EVA Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Mar;62(3):308-16.
- Delcourt C, Carrière I, Delage M, Barberger-Gateau P, Schalch W; POLA Study Group. Plasma lutein and zeaxanthin and other carotenoids as modifiable risk factors for age-related maculopathy and cataract: the POLA Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;47(6):2329-35.
- Leung IY, Sandstrom MM, Zucker CL, Neuringer M, Max Snodderly D. Nutritional manipulation of primate retinas. IV. Effects of n--3 fatty acids, lutein, and zeaxanthin on S-cones and rods in the foveal region. Exp Eye Res. 2005 Nov;81(5):513-29.
- Neuringer M, Sandstrom MM, Johnson EJ, Snodderly DM. Nutritional manipulation of primate retinas, I: effects of lutein or zeaxanthin supplements on serum and macular pigment in xanthophyll-free rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3234-43.
- Richer S, Devenport J, Lang JC. LAST II: Differential temporal responses of macular pigment optical density in patients with atrophic age-related macular degeneration to dietary supplementation with xanthophylls. Optometry. 2007 May;78(5):213-9.
- Richer S, Stiles W, Statkute L, Pulido J, Frankowski J, Rudy D, Pei K, Tsipursky M, Nyland J. Double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of lutein and antioxidant supplementation in the intervention of atrophic age-related macular degeneration: the Veterans LAST study (Lutein Antioxidant Supplementation Trial). Optometry. 2004 Apr;75(4):216-30.
- Schalch W, Cohn W, Barker FM, Köpcke W, Mellerio J, Bird AC, Robson AG, Fitzke FF, van Kuijk FJ. Xanthophyll accumulation in the human retina during supplementation with lutein or zeaxanthin - the LUXEA (LUtein Xanthophyll Eye Accumulation) study. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Feb 15;458(2):128-35. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
- Thomson LR, Toyoda Y, Langner A, Delori FC, Garnett KM, Craft N, Nichols CR, Cheng KM, Dorey CK. Elevated retinal zeaxanthin and prevention of light-induced photoreceptor cell death in quail. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Nov;43(11):3538-49.
- CHRY1
- IRB 07-046
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Subjects were patients in the Ophthalmology/Optometry Clinic North Chicago DVA Medical Center (now the James A. Lovell Federal Health Center)with early and moderate AMD retinopathy up to, but not including,high risk NEI AREDS retinopathy. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | No enrolled participant was excluded before assignment to groups. Patients were asked to continue with their normal diet and were asked not to take any dietary supplement containing lutein (or zeaxanthin) beyond the 250 ug (1/4mg) commonly found in pabulum Centrum® type vitamins. |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 10 | 25 | 25 |
4 Months | 9 | 24 | 23 |
8 Months | 9 | 22 | 21 |
12 Months | 9 | 21 | 21 |
COMPLETED | 9 | 21 | 21 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 4 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 10 | 25 | 25 | 60 |
Age (Count of Participants) | ||||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
3
30%
|
5
20%
|
4
16%
|
12
20%
|
>=65 years |
7
70%
|
20
80%
|
21
84%
|
48
80%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
73.9
(9)
|
75.8
(9)
|
74.4
(11)
|
74.9
(10)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
1
10%
|
1
4%
|
1
4%
|
3
5%
|
Male |
9
90%
|
24
96%
|
24
96%
|
57
95%
|
Macular Pigment Optical Density (Density units of macular pigment) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Density units of macular pigment] |
0.37
(0.05)
|
0.29
(0.06)
|
0.35
(0.04)
|
0.33
(0.05)
|
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study distance visual acuity (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
93.3
(8)
|
86.8
(12)
|
88.3
(10)
|
88.7
(13)
|
Glare Recovery (Seconds) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Seconds] |
52.9
(16)
|
35.6
(6)
|
26.7
(5)
|
34.1
(30)
|
Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
212
(34)
|
204
(30)
|
201
(22)
|
204
(125)
|
Shape Discrimination (% modulation) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [% modulation] |
0.7
(0.2)
|
0.7
(0.1)
|
1
(0.2)
|
0.8
(0.8)
|
6.5 degrees Tritan threshold ((dB)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [(dB)] |
4.9
(4)
|
8.6
(12)
|
6
(9)
|
6.9
(10)
|
100% Kinetic Field (Units on a scale (0 to 6000)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Units on a scale (0 to 6000)] |
5514
(2074)
|
1717
(765)
|
2649
(750)
|
2738
(4471)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Macular Pigment Optical Density |
---|---|
Description | Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78). |
Time Frame | 4 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All participants in all arms were tested |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 24 | 23 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Density units of Macular Pigment (du)] |
0.48
(.05)
|
0.38
(.06)
|
0.42
(.04)
|
Title | SHAPE Discrimination |
---|---|
Description | We determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Eyes of all participants still in the trial were measured |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 21 | 21 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [% modulation] |
0.5
(.24)
|
0.6
(0.25)
|
0.6
(.46)
|
Title | Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity |
---|---|
Description | Black and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 21 | 21 |
Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale] |
98.9
(5.7)
|
92.8
(5.9)
|
96.8
(8.35)
|
Title | Glare Recovery |
---|---|
Description | Photostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan). |
Time Frame | 12 Months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 21 | 21 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Seconds] |
25.2
(28.5)
|
14.85
(22)
|
16.65
(10.25)
|
Title | Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance |
---|---|
Description | Distance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units. |
Time Frame | 12 Months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 21 | 21 |
Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale] |
310.5
(33.8)
|
247.1
(35)
|
254.7
(35.2)
|
Title | 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold |
---|---|
Description | The ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 21 | 21 |
Mean (Standard Error) [dB] |
4.46
(1.08)
|
8.37
(1.39)
|
3.45
(1.09)
|
Title | 100% Kinetic Field |
---|---|
Description | Scotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma). |
Time Frame | 12 Months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 21 | 21 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Units on a scale (0 to 6000)] |
2704
(1745)
|
2207
(210)
|
1129
(650)
|
Title | Macular Pigment Optical Density |
---|---|
Description | Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78). |
Time Frame | 8 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All participants in all arms were tested |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 22 | 21 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Density units of Macular Pigment (du)] |
0.48
(0.05)
|
0.44
(0.06)
|
0.46
(0.04)
|
Title | Macular Pigment Optical Density |
---|---|
Description | Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering light emitting diodes and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All participants in all arms were tested |
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months |
Measure Participants | 9 | 21 | 21 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Density units of Macular Pigment (du)] |
0.54
(0.05)
|
0.52
(0.06)
|
0.48
(0.04)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 12 months | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Lutein and Zeaxanthin have been used as ingredients in dietary supplements since 1994. No adverse report has ever been filed | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin | |||
Arm/Group Description | Lutein 9 mg per day | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/25 (0%) | 0/25 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/25 (0%) | 0/25 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Stuart P. Richer |
---|---|
Organization | James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center |
Phone | 224-610-5440 |
Stuart.Richer1@va.gov |
- CHRY1
- IRB 07-046