ZVF: The Zeaxanthin and Visual Function Study

Sponsor
Chrysantis, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00564902
Collaborator
Kowa Company, Ltd. (Industry), IMAGE TECHNOLOGIES INC. (Industry)
60
1
3
19
3.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To evaluate if supplementation of zeaxanthin (with or without Lutein) is beneficial to patients with early and moderate Atrophic Age Related Macular Degeneration.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin
  • Dietary Supplement: Lutein
  • Dietary Supplement: Lutein and Zeaxanthin
N/A

Detailed Description

To evaluate whether or not zeaxanthin supplementation raises macular pigment optical density (MPOD). Previous research has shown MPOD to mirror visual benefits for patients with age related atrophic macular degeneration (AMD) having visual symptoms (decreased visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, photostress glare recovery and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 scores), but lower risk National Eye Institute (NEI) / Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) characteristics.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Randomized, Double Blind, Lutein Controlled Study of Zeaxanthin and Visual Function in Atrophic Age Related Macular Degeneration Patients
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Lutein

9 mg of Lutein for 12 months

Dietary Supplement: Lutein
9 mg of Lutein during 12 months

Active Comparator: Zeaxanthin and Lutein

3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months

Dietary Supplement: Lutein and Zeaxanthin
8 mg of lutein and 8 mg of Zeaxanthin administered during 12 months

Active Comparator: Zeaxanthin

3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months

Drug: 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin
8 mg per day during 12 months
Other Names:
  • EZEyes
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Macular Pigment Optical Density [4 months]

      Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).

    2. Macular Pigment Optical Density [8 months]

      Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).

    3. Macular Pigment Optical Density [12 months]

      Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering light emitting diodes and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. SHAPE Discrimination [12 months]

      We determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation.

    2. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity [12 months]

      Black and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed.

    3. Glare Recovery [12 Months]

      Photostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan).

    4. Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance [12 Months]

      Distance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units.

    5. 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold [12 months]

      The ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold.

    6. 100% Kinetic Field [12 Months]

      Scotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    45 Years to 90 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • diagnosis of atrophic AMD (ICD9 362.51) by stereo bio-ophthalmoscopy and at least one vision degrading visual-psychophysical abnormality associated with AMD in one or both eyes.

    • clear non-lenticular ocular media (cornea, aqueous and vitreous)

    • free of advanced glaucoma and diabetes or any other ocular or systemic disease that could affect central or parafoveal macula visual function

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • high risk retinal characteristics for advanced AMD or advanced AMD for which existing medical / surgical options are available

    • presence of ophthalmologically significant active exudative, AMD pathology by fluorescein angiography but also a single large drusen, >15, multiple intermediate drusen, parafoveal geographic atrophy or loss of vision in one eye due to advanced AMD

    • recent (within 6 months) cataract or retinal surgery

    • taking photosensitizing drugs such as phenothiazines and chloroquine

    • having taken lutein or zeaxanthin supplements within the past six months.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 North Chicago VA Medical Center North Chicago Illinois United States 60064

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Chrysantis, Inc.
    • Kowa Company, Ltd.
    • IMAGE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Stuart Richer, Ph. D., North Chicago VA Medical Center
    • Study Director: William Stiles, M.D., North Chicago VA Medical Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Chrysantis, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00564902
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CHRY1
    • IRB 07-046
    First Posted:
    Nov 29, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2012

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Subjects were patients in the Ophthalmology/Optometry Clinic North Chicago DVA Medical Center (now the James A. Lovell Federal Health Center)with early and moderate AMD retinopathy up to, but not including,high risk NEI AREDS retinopathy.
    Pre-assignment Detail No enrolled participant was excluded before assignment to groups. Patients were asked to continue with their normal diet and were asked not to take any dietary supplement containing lutein (or zeaxanthin) beyond the 250 ug (1/4mg) commonly found in pabulum Centrum® type vitamins.
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 10 25 25
    4 Months 9 24 23
    8 Months 9 22 21
    12 Months 9 21 21
    COMPLETED 9 21 21
    NOT COMPLETED 1 4 4

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin Total
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 10 25 25 60
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    3
    30%
    5
    20%
    4
    16%
    12
    20%
    >=65 years
    7
    70%
    20
    80%
    21
    84%
    48
    80%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    73.9
    (9)
    75.8
    (9)
    74.4
    (11)
    74.9
    (10)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    1
    10%
    1
    4%
    1
    4%
    3
    5%
    Male
    9
    90%
    24
    96%
    24
    96%
    57
    95%
    Macular Pigment Optical Density (Density units of macular pigment) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Density units of macular pigment]
    0.37
    (0.05)
    0.29
    (0.06)
    0.35
    (0.04)
    0.33
    (0.05)
    Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study distance visual acuity (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    93.3
    (8)
    86.8
    (12)
    88.3
    (10)
    88.7
    (13)
    Glare Recovery (Seconds) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Seconds]
    52.9
    (16)
    35.6
    (6)
    26.7
    (5)
    34.1
    (30)
    Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    212
    (34)
    204
    (30)
    201
    (22)
    204
    (125)
    Shape Discrimination (% modulation) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [% modulation]
    0.7
    (0.2)
    0.7
    (0.1)
    1
    (0.2)
    0.8
    (0.8)
    6.5 degrees Tritan threshold ((dB)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [(dB)]
    4.9
    (4)
    8.6
    (12)
    6
    (9)
    6.9
    (10)
    100% Kinetic Field (Units on a scale (0 to 6000)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Units on a scale (0 to 6000)]
    5514
    (2074)
    1717
    (765)
    2649
    (750)
    2738
    (4471)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Macular Pigment Optical Density
    Description Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).
    Time Frame 4 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants in all arms were tested
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 24 23
    Mean (Standard Error) [Density units of Macular Pigment (du)]
    0.48
    (.05)
    0.38
    (.06)
    0.42
    (.04)
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title SHAPE Discrimination
    Description We determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation.
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eyes of all participants still in the trial were measured
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 21 21
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [% modulation]
    0.5
    (.24)
    0.6
    (0.25)
    0.6
    (.46)
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity
    Description Black and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed.
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 21 21
    Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale]
    98.9
    (5.7)
    92.8
    (5.9)
    96.8
    (8.35)
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Glare Recovery
    Description Photostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan).
    Time Frame 12 Months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 21 21
    Mean (Standard Error) [Seconds]
    25.2
    (28.5)
    14.85
    (22)
    16.65
    (10.25)
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance
    Description Distance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units.
    Time Frame 12 Months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 21 21
    Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale]
    310.5
    (33.8)
    247.1
    (35)
    254.7
    (35.2)
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold
    Description The ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold.
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 21 21
    Mean (Standard Error) [dB]
    4.46
    (1.08)
    8.37
    (1.39)
    3.45
    (1.09)
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title 100% Kinetic Field
    Description Scotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma).
    Time Frame 12 Months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 21 21
    Mean (Standard Error) [Units on a scale (0 to 6000)]
    2704
    (1745)
    2207
    (210)
    1129
    (650)
    8. Primary Outcome
    Title Macular Pigment Optical Density
    Description Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).
    Time Frame 8 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants in all arms were tested
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 22 21
    Mean (Standard Error) [Density units of Macular Pigment (du)]
    0.48
    (0.05)
    0.44
    (0.06)
    0.46
    (0.04)
    9. Primary Outcome
    Title Macular Pigment Optical Density
    Description Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering light emitting diodes and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated.
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants in all arms were tested
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    Measure Participants 9 21 21
    Mean (Standard Error) [Density units of Macular Pigment (du)]
    0.54
    (0.05)
    0.52
    (0.06)
    0.48
    (0.04)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 12 months
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Lutein and Zeaxanthin have been used as ingredients in dietary supplements since 1994. No adverse report has ever been filed
    Arm/Group Title Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Arm/Group Description Lutein 9 mg per day 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
    All Cause Mortality
    Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/25 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Lutein Lutein Zeaxanthin Zeaxanthin
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/25 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr. Stuart P. Richer
    Organization James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center
    Phone 224-610-5440
    Email Stuart.Richer1@va.gov
    Responsible Party:
    Chrysantis, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00564902
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CHRY1
    • IRB 07-046
    First Posted:
    Nov 29, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2012