WMTMS: Using TMS to Increase Executive Function in Older Adults

Sponsor
Duke University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02767323
Collaborator
National Institute on Aging (NIA) (NIH)
184
1
3
43
4.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Cognitive decline and dementia have become important public health issues in our time as medical science has increased lifespan and our society becomes progressively older. A great deal of the cognitive decline due to aging can be explained by decline in working memory (WM), a mental function central to cognition in which aging deficits appear almost universally. Attempts to use WM training to increase WM ability in older adults has had some success, but the transfer of performance enhancements caused by this training to other cognitive skills is controversial. Another intervention that shows much promise is noninvasive stimulation of cerebral cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which has been shown to increase performance in many cognitive tasks.

Here, the investigator proposes to use fMRI-guided rTMS to enhance working memory performance. This will be achieved through three Aims. In the first, registered on this record, the investigator will stimulate both old and young healthy adults while they perform the WM task that will engage the frontoparietal network. To define the optimal rTMS target, rTMS will be applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC: Aim 1a); or over the parietal cortex (PC: Aim 1b). These regions are involved not only in the maintenance of items in WM, but also in their manipulation, therefore applying rTMS over these areas should create WM performance enhancements that will be long-lasting. In Aim 1c, a direct within-subject comparison of these 2 targeted sites is performed.

In the second and third Aims, older adults will receive active or sham rTMS over the optimal target (defined in Arm 1) during two weeks of daily sessions while they perform the WM tasks. In the second Aim, the investigator hopes to demonstrate that the cumulative effect of multiple TMS sessions, in tandem with the synergistic effects of simultaneous TMS + WM training, create WM performance enhancements greater than those found with WM training alone, whose effects are long-lasting, continuing a month following the course of TMS sessions. In the third, the investigator will investigate whether the WM enhancements generated by the two weeks of TMS sessions will generalize to other cognitive tasks. The success of these 3 Aims will provide proof in principle for long-lasting, transferable effects of TMS in remediating WM and more general cognitive deficits due to aging, and point to a possible non-invasive brain stimulation therapy for cognitive decline in healthy aging and in dementia. This record is a reflection of Aim1, Aim 2 and 3 will be registered separately.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: rTMS
  • Device: Sham rTMS
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
184 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Factorial Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Basic Science
Official Title:
Using fMRI-guided TMS to Increase Central Executive Function in Older Adults
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 15, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 16, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 16, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Active or Sham rTMS over the DLPFC (Aim1a)

excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided). Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design

Device: rTMS
excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used

Device: Sham rTMS
an electrical sham coil reproducing the same clicking sound and tactile sensation than the active rTMS will be used

Experimental: Active or Sham rTMS over the Parietal cortex (Aim1b)

excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided). Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design

Device: rTMS
excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used

Device: Sham rTMS
an electrical sham coil reproducing the same clicking sound and tactile sensation than the active rTMS will be used

Experimental: Active or Sham rTMS over the DLPFC and the Parietal cortex (Aim1c)

excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided). Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design

Device: rTMS
excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used

Device: Sham rTMS
an electrical sham coil reproducing the same clicking sound and tactile sensation than the active rTMS will be used

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Accuracy (in Percentage) [During the rTMS session, on average 2 hours per visit.]

    Accuracy (in percentage) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS. The accuracy provided below are the ones obtained in the hardest condition of the working memory task.

  2. Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Reaction Time of Correct Response (in ms) [During the rTMS session, on average 2 hours per visit]

    Reaction Time of correct response (in ms) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS. The reaction times provided below are the ones obtained in the hardest condition of the working memory task.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age Restrictions: Young Group (from 18 to 35 years old), Elderly Group (from 60 to 80 years old).

  • Use of effective method of birth control for women of childbearing capacity.

  • Willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Current or recent (within the past 6 months) history of substance abuse or dependence.

  • Current serious medical illness.

  • History of seizure, epilepsy, stroke, brain surgery, head injury, cranial metal implants, known structural brain lesion, devices that may be affected by rTMS or MRI (pacemaker, medication pump, cochlear implant, implanted brain stimulator)

  • Inability or unwilling to give informed consent.

  • Diagnosed any Axis I DSM-IV disorder (MINI, DSM-IV).

  • For subjects age > 59 years, a total scaled score < 8 on the Dementia Rating Scale-2.

  • Clinically defined neurological disorder.

  • Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure, or currently taking medication that lowers the seizure threshold.

  • Claustrophobia (MRI scanner).

  • Pregnancy.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina United States 27705

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Duke University
  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lawrence Appelbaum, Duke University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02767323
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Pro00065334
  • 1R01AG050618-01
First Posted:
May 10, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Apr 5, 2021
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b) Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Active/Sham rTMS Over DLPFC (Aim1a), Then Active/Sham rTMS Over DLPFC and Parietal Cortex (Aim1c)
Arm/Group Description excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) and the Parietal cortex rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 83 42 58 1
COMPLETED 49 17 28 1
NOT COMPLETED 34 25 30 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b) Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a), Then Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1c) Total
Arm/Group Description excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 83 42 58 1 184
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
57
68.7%
18
42.9%
58
100%
1
100%
134
72.8%
>=65 years
26
31.3%
24
57.1%
0
0%
0
0%
50
27.2%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
40.85
(23.09)
67.26
(6.23)
23.65
(4.14)
28
(1.4)
41.31
(22.47)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
52
62.7%
16
38.1%
34
58.6%
0
0%
102
55.4%
Male
31
37.3%
26
61.9%
24
41.4%
1
100%
82
44.6%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Asian
14
16.9%
0
0%
13
22.4%
0
0%
27
14.7%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Black or African American
6
7.2%
5
11.9%
11
19%
1
100%
23
12.5%
White
62
74.7%
37
88.1%
33
56.9%
0
0%
132
71.7%
More than one race
1
1.2%
0
0%
1
1.7%
0
0%
2
1.1%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
United States
83
100%
42
100%
58
100%
1
100%
184
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Accuracy (in Percentage)
Description Accuracy (in percentage) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS. The accuracy provided below are the ones obtained in the hardest condition of the working memory task.
Time Frame During the rTMS session, on average 2 hours per visit.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Subjects who completed the study. Data not collected on five subjects.
Arm/Group Title Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b) Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)
Arm/Group Description excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Measure Participants 46 15 29
Active rTMS
50.43
(7.37)
55.42
(5.50)
83.93
(8.09)
Sham rTMS
46.49
(7.35)
57.76
(5.70)
83.27
(10.88)
2. Primary Outcome
Title Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Reaction Time of Correct Response (in ms)
Description Reaction Time of correct response (in ms) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS. The reaction times provided below are the ones obtained in the hardest condition of the working memory task.
Time Frame During the rTMS session, on average 2 hours per visit

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Subjects who completed the study. Data not collected on five subjects.
Arm/Group Title Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b) Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)
Arm/Group Description excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Measure Participants 46 15 29
Active rTMS
2368
(335)
2214
(231)
1911
(356)
Sham rTMS
2388
(345)
2224
(180)
1924
(332)

Adverse Events

Time Frame During the rTMS session and a few minutes after, up to 10 minutes
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Active rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b) Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b) Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c)
Arm/Group Description excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
All Cause Mortality
Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Active rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b) Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b) Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/83 (0%) 0/83 (0%) 0/42 (0%) 0/42 (0%) 0/58 (0%) 0/58 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Active rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b) Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b) Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/83 (0%) 0/83 (0%) 0/42 (0%) 0/42 (0%) 0/58 (0%) 0/58 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Active rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b) Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b) Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c) Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c) Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/83 (0%) 0/83 (0%) 0/42 (0%) 0/42 (0%) 0/58 (0%) 0/58 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 0/1 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Dr. Lysianne Beynel
Organization Duke University
Phone 9193386273
Email lysianne.beynel@gmail.com
Responsible Party:
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02767323
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Pro00065334
  • 1R01AG050618-01
First Posted:
May 10, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Apr 5, 2021
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2021