AI-aided Optical Coherence Tomography for the Detection of Basal Cell Carcinoma

Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05817279
Collaborator
(none)
124
1
8.7
14.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of cancer among the Caucasian population. A BCC diagnosis is commonly establish by means of an invasive punch biopsy (golden standard). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a safe non-invasive diagnostic modality which may replace biopsy if an OCT assessor is able to establish a high confidence BCC diagnosis. Hence, for clinical implementation of OCT, diagnostic certainty should be as high as possible. Artificial intelligence in the form of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) may improve the diagnostic certainty of newly trained OCT assessors by highlighting suspicious areas on OCT scans and by providing diagnostic suggestions (classification). This study will evaluate the effect of a CDSS on the diagnostic certainty and accuracy of OCT assessors.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography

Detailed Description

In this diagnostic case control design, OCT assessors will retrospectively evaluate OCT scans of equivocal BCC lesions twice (once with, and once without the help of the CDSS). A total of 124 scans (62 BCC/62 non-BCC) will be included in the study. Cases will be shuffled to prevent recall bias. AI-aided OCT scans and unaided OCT scans will be presented in alternating order. The assessors will express their certainty level on a 5-point confidence scale. The diagnostic certainty and diagnostic accuracy of OCT assessment with CDSS and without CDSS will be compared.

Research questions:
  1. Does AI-aided OCT assessment result in an increase in high-confidence diagnoses compared to unaided OCT assessment?

  2. Does AI-aided OCT assessment result in a significant increase in sensitivity for BCC detection without compromising specificity compared to unaided OCT assessment?

  3. Does AI-aided OCT assessment result in more accurate BCC subtyping compared to unaided OCT assessment (explorative)

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
124 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
AI-aided Optical Coherence Tomography for the Detection of Basal Cell Carcinoma
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Apr 10, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
AI-OCT

Group of 124 patients with equivocal BCC lesions. Of these lesions, OCT scans have been obtained in the past. These scans will be evaluated with AI-assistance.

Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography
Optical coherence tomography: OCT is a non-invasive CE-certified diagnostic modality based on light interferometry. An OCT scan visualizes an area with a diameter of 6mm thereby revealing the skin and adnexal structures with a depth of approximately 1.5mm. 3mm punch biopsy: the patients included in this study underwent a 3mm punch biopsy conform regular care. The subsequent histopathological examination of the biopsy specimen serves as ground truth diagnosis of the lesions (gold standard)
Other Names:
  • 3mm punch biopsy
  • Unaided OCT

    Group of 124 patients with equivocal BCC lesions (same patients as in AI-OCT group). Of these lesions, OCT scans have been obtained in the past. These scans will be evaluated without AI-assistance.

    Diagnostic Test: Optical coherence tomography
    Optical coherence tomography: OCT is a non-invasive CE-certified diagnostic modality based on light interferometry. An OCT scan visualizes an area with a diameter of 6mm thereby revealing the skin and adnexal structures with a depth of approximately 1.5mm. 3mm punch biopsy: the patients included in this study underwent a 3mm punch biopsy conform regular care. The subsequent histopathological examination of the biopsy specimen serves as ground truth diagnosis of the lesions (gold standard)
    Other Names:
  • 3mm punch biopsy
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Proportion of high-confidence diagnoses [31-12-2023]

      The difference in percentage of high-confidence diagnoses will be evaluated between AI-OCT and unaided OCT.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Diagnostic accuracy of high-confidence diagnoses [31-12-2023]

      Diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predicted value, diagnostic odds ratio) will be estimated for high-confidence diagnoses made by AI-OCT and unaided OCT.

    2. Diagnostic parameters for BCC subtyping [31-12-2023]

      Differences in diagnostic parameters for BCC subtyping (sBCC/nBCC/iBCC) will be evaluated (explorative)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients (18+ years)

    • Patient underwent OCT scan and punch biopsy for an equivocal BCC lesion

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patient unable to sign informed consent

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Maastricht University Medical Center+ Maastricht Limbrug Netherlands 6202AZ

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Maastricht University Medical Center

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Maastricht University Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05817279
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2022-3517
    First Posted:
    Apr 18, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 18, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Maastricht University Medical Center
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 18, 2023