APOLLO: AI Driven National Platform for CT cOronary Angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns Registry

Sponsor
National Heart Centre Singapore (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05509010
Collaborator
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (Other)
8,000
3
74
2666.7
36

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The overall aim is to build an AI driven national Platform for CT cOronary angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns (APOLLO) for automated anonymization, reporting, Agatston scoring and plaque quantification in CAD. It is a "one-stop" platform spanning diagnosis to clinical management and prognosis, and aid in predicting pharmacotherapy response.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: CTCA

Detailed Description

Coronary artery disease (CAD), a blockage of the blood vessels, affects 6% of the general population and up to 20% of those over 65 years of age. CAD is a leading cause of cardiac mortality in Singapore and worldwide, with 19% of deaths in Singapore due to CAD (MOH website).

Numbers of CAD cases are increasing due to ageing and the higher prevalence of contributary diseases such as diabetes. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) is the first-line investigation for CAD as indicated by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Recent Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) and Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart (SCOT-HEART) trials support CTCA as the dominant means for evaluating coronary anatomy and physiology as it increases diagnostic certainty, improves efficiency of triage to invasive catheterization and reduces radiation exposure when compared to functional stress testing.

Currently, CAD report generation requires 3-6 hours of a CT specialist's time to annotate scans, with inter-observer variability of 20%. In addition, there is no effective singular toolkit to analyse Agatston scores (a measure of calcified CAD), severity of stenosis, and plaque characterisation.

These problems have severely constrained the effectiveness of CTCA as a diagnostic and research tool. The investigators plan to build upon Singapore's competitive advantages in artificial intelligence (AI) to provide a solution to these gaps.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
8000 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Other
Official Title:
AI Driven National Platform for CT cOronary Angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns Registry (APOLLO)
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2027
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Retrospective

4000 patients who were clinically evaluated by CTCA from 1 Jan 2007 to 31 Oct 2017.

Procedure: CTCA
CTCA is performed as part of routine care procedure.

Prospective

4000 patients who are clinically evaluated by CTCA.

Procedure: CTCA
CTCA is performed as part of routine care procedure.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. AI precision toolkits: AI stenosis reporting [baseline]

    Stenosis reporting: Severity of stenosis and accurate anatomical localization of stenosis. The significance of a stenosis is determined by visual estimation of the maximal grade of luminal narrowing caused by the plaque. As recommended in SCCT guideline (Leipsic et al., 2014) , coronary stenosis can be graded as minimal, mild, moderate, severe and total occluded separately. Following the guideline, a stenosis will be classified as obstructive and non-obstructive. The location of the stenosis uses the SCCT model (Leipsic et al., 2014)

  2. AI precision toolkits: Agatston scoring [baseline]

    Agatston scoring: Agatston scoring of calcified plaque. As recommended in SCCT clinical practical guidelines (Leipsic et al., 2014), Agatston scoring programs generally identify pixels that exceed 130 HU as a level corresponding to calcium on a non-contrast study (Agatston et al., 1990) . The reader needs to identify each lesion discrete calcific focus) in each vessel distribution. The summed score for each vessel is generated by the scoring program based on an area-density (Agatston score) (Agatston et al., 1990) measurement of each calcified focus. The total coronary Agatston score is the sum of all calcified lesions in all coronary beds.

  3. AI precision toolkits: Plaque [baseline]

    Plaque analysis: Plaque volume, burden, type and anatomical locations. Coronary segmentation and plaque analysis is performed for segments with diameter ≥1.5 mm. Location of plaque uses the SCCT model (Leipsic et al., 2014). For each plaque, the reader marks its start-and end-points, quantifies plaque area,volume and plaque burden, and specifies its type (non-calcified, calcified, or mixed) (Achenbach et al., 2004) . Additionally, non-calcified plaque can be further divided into low attenuation plaque (LAP). A HU <30 will signify LAP and >30 will signify non-LAP.

  4. AI precision toolkits: EAT analysis [baseline]

    EAT analysis: Total volume and anatomical locations. EAT and pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) are metabolically active fat surrounding the coronary artery and the heart, being associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (Villasante et al, 2019) . EAT can be quantified on non-contrast CT scans. The annotations on the CT scans are obtained by manually drawing the pericardium first to define the region. EAT is identified using the adipose tissue attenuation references between -190 and -30 HU (Oikonomou et al., 2018) . Due to the CT scan noise and changing of attenuation, the HU value of fat can vary, so the final EAT region is verified by an experienced radiologist or cardiologist.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. AI outcome analysis [one to five years from baseline]

    1. Mortality (All-cause and/or cardiovascular)

  2. AI outcome analysis [one to five years from baseline]

    Major-adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, revascularisation, arrhythmias, etc)

  3. AI outcome analysis [one to five years from baseline]

    Re-hospitalisation

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age ≥21 years old

  2. Signed informed consent

  3. Clinically indicated for evaluation by CTCA

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Individuals unable to provide informed consent

  2. Known complex congenital heart disease

  3. Planned invasive angiography for reasons other than CAD

  4. Non-cardiac illness with life expectancy < 2 years

  5. Pregnancy

  6. Concomitant participation in another clinical trial in which subject is subject to investigational drug or device

  7. Cardiac event and/or coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valvular repair/replacement prior to CTCA

  8. Glomerular Filtration Rate ≤ 30mL/min

  9. Known allergy to iodinated contrast agent

  10. Contraindications to beta blockers or nitroglycerin or adenosine

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 National Heart Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore 169609
2 National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
3 Tan Tock Seng Hospital Singapore Singapore

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • National Heart Centre Singapore
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Liang Zhong, National Heart Centre Singapore

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
National Heart Centre Singapore
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05509010
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • APOLLO
First Posted:
Aug 19, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Aug 19, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by National Heart Centre Singapore
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 19, 2022