The Training and Evaluate Effect on Clinical Airway Management
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
In this self-control experiment, anesthesiologists with limited experiments of bronchoscopy working in anesthesiology department in Peking Union Medical College Hospital will receive a training and evaluation procedure in simulation and clinical practice about clinical airway management. The objects was (1) to investigate the improvements of manufacturing bronchoscopy in simulation and clinical practise before and after training on simulation,(2) to record the efforts trainees needed to achieve experienced on simulation, (3) to evaluate if status manufacturing on simulations could reflect the ones in clinical practise.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
A modified global rating scale from 1 (unskilled) to 5 (expert) with a score of 3 linked to proficiency, and 5-points Likert from 1 (felt extremely unsure) to 5 (felt extremely confidence) with a score of 4 linked to confidence were used to evaluate during the procedure of training and evaluation.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: anesthesiologist with limited experiment Anesthesiologists with limited experiment of bronchoscopy. |
Behavioral: anesthesiologist with limited experiment
Using the simulate device, the trainees are going to trained and evaluated the ability of driving bronchoscopy in simulate device and clinical practice.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change of Time needed. [Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.]
Change of time needed to navigate using bronchoscopy.
- Change of modified global rating scores (GRS). [Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.]
Change of modified global rating scores (GRS) rating manufacturing skills using bronchoscopy. Total score ranges from 4 to 20 scores at 1-score intervals, higher score matches better skill. Total score is the submission of four subscales, which evaluating central view, mucosal contact, progress and orientation using bronchoscopy, ranges from 1 to 5 scores at 1-score interval, higher scores represent better outcome.
- Change of Likert score. [Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.]
Change of Likert score evaluating self-confidence using bronchoscopy. Likert score ranges from 1 to 5 scores at 1-score intervals, higher score with more self-confidence.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Inconsistency of evaluation of time needed between simulate and clinical practice. [At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.]
Inconsistency of time needed to navigate using bronchoscopy.
- Inconsistency of evaluation of modified global rating scores (GRS) between simulate and clinical practice. [At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.]
Inconsistency of modified global rating scores (GRS) rating manufacturing skills, using bronchoscopy. Total score ranges from 4 to 20 scores at 1-score intervals, higher score matches better skill. Total score is the submission of four subscales, which evaluating central view, mucosal contact, progress and orientation using bronchoscopy, ranges from 1 to 5 scores at 1-score interval, higher scores represent better outcome.
- Inconsistency of evaluation of Likert score between simulate and clinical practice. [At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.]
Inconsistency of Likert score evaluating self-confidence using bronchoscopy. Likert score ranges from 1 to 5 scores at 1-score intervals, higher score with more self-confidence.
Other Outcome Measures
- Efforts needed on simulate. [An average of 6 hours, since begin of simulate training.]
Hours needed to achieve well-trained.
- Efforts needed on simulate. [An average of 6 hours, since begin of simulate training.]
Cases needed to achieve well-trained.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
An anesthesiologist who is working on anesthesia airway management；
-
During the research period, he/she worked in the anesthesiology department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital；
-
Have some experience in airway management，Meet at least one of the following conditions: ①Airway management experience ≤10 cases；②Objective GRS score <3 points；③Subjective Likert score <3 points
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Cannot complete pre-training assessment；
-
Cannot complete the training course；
-
Cannot complete the post-training evaluation；
-
Clinical airway managers were not performed during the study period.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Investigators
- Study Chair: Chunhua Yu, Doctor, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- zs1809