IMAGO: Safety and Efficacy Study of LUM001 in the Treatment of Cholestatic Liver Disease in Patients With Alagille Syndrome

Sponsor
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01903460
Collaborator
(none)
20
3
2
19
6.7
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LUM001. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating the effect of LUM001 versus placebo on the biochemical markers and pruritus associated with Alagille Syndrome.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LUM001, an Apical Sodium-dependent Bile Acid Transporter Inhibitor (ASBTi), in the Treatment of Cholestatic Liver Disease in Paediatric Patients With Alagille Syndrome
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: LUM001

LUM001 administered orally once each day

Drug: LUM001

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Placebo administered orally once each day

Drug: Placebo

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Fasting Serum Bile Acid Level [Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment]

    Participants were required to fast for at least 4 hours; only water was permitted prior to collection. A negative change from baseline indicates that the level of bile acid decreased.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver Enzymes [Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment]

    Analysis of liver enzymes included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). A negative change from baseline indicates that the level of that enzyme decreased.

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily Scores [Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment]

    The ItchRO was administered as a twice daily electronic diary (eDiary). Children ≥9 years of age completed the patient ItchRO; those between the ages of 5 and 8 completed the patient ItchRO with the assistance of their caregiver. There was no patient report for subjects under the age of 5. ItchRO scores range from 0 to 4, with the higher score indicating increasing itch severity. ItchRO average daily scores were calculated as the sum of daily scores (ie, the maximum of morning and evening scores) divided by the number of days. The average daily score was calculated by using the 7 days pre-treatment for baseline, and the last 7 days of treatment for Week 13. A negative change from Baseline indicates that itch severity decreased.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
12 Months to 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Diagnosis of Alagille Syndrome

  2. Evidence of cholestasis

  3. Moderate to severe pruritus

  4. Ability to understand and willingness to sign informed consent/assent prior to initiation of any study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Surgical disruption of the enterohepatic circulation

  2. Liver transplant

  3. History or presence of other concomitant liver disease

  4. Females who are pregnant or lactating

  5. Known HIV infection

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Birmingham Children's Hospital Birmingham West Midlands United Kingdom B4 6NH
2 Leeds Teaching Hospitals Leeds West Yorkshire United Kingdom LS9 7TF
3 Kings College Hospital London United Kingdom SE5 9RS

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Study Director, Mirum

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01903460
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • LUM001-302
  • 2012-005346-38
  • SHP625-302
First Posted:
Jul 19, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Mar 28, 2019
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2019
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day Placebo Cohort A Placebo Cohort B
Arm/Group Description Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 140ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 140ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 140ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 280ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 280ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 280ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 6 8 3 3
COMPLETED 6 8 3 2
NOT COMPLETED 0 0 0 1

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day Placebo Cohort A Placebo Cohort B Total
Arm/Group Description Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 140ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 140ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 140ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 280ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 280ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 280ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 6 8 3 3 20
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
5.8
(4.49)
6.8
(6.73)
5.0
(2.00)
4.3
(3.21)
5.9
(4.93)
Age, Customized (participants) [Number]
< 2 years
0
0%
3
37.5%
0
0%
0
0%
3
15%
2 to 4 years
3
50%
1
12.5%
1
33.3%
2
66.7%
7
35%
5 to 8 years
1
16.7%
1
12.5%
2
66.7%
1
33.3%
5
25%
9 to 12 years
2
33.3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
10%
13 to 18 years
0
0%
3
37.5%
0
0%
0
0%
3
15%
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
2
33.3%
3
37.5%
3
100%
2
66.7%
10
50%
Male
4
66.7%
5
62.5%
0
0%
1
33.3%
10
50%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United Kingdom
6
100%
8
100%
3
100%
3
100%
20
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Fasting Serum Bile Acid Level
Description Participants were required to fast for at least 4 hours; only water was permitted prior to collection. A negative change from baseline indicates that the level of bile acid decreased.
Time Frame Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population, defined as all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The Safety population was defined as all participants who were randomly assigned to study treatment and who received any amount of study drug.
Arm/Group Title LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day LUM001 Overall Placebo Overall
Arm/Group Description Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 140ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 140ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 140ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 280ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 280ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 280ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received either dose of LUM001 for up to 10 or 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
Measure Participants 6 8 14 6
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [umol/L]
-82.864
(50.1513)
-49.388
(43.4732)
-66.126
(33.1208)
-42.157
(50.0903)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 140ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5740
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value -40.707
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-191.679 to 110.265
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 280ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9147
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value -7.231
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-148.726 to 134.264
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 Overall, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of all doses of LUM001
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6954
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value -23.969
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-151.969 to 104.031
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver Enzymes
Description Analysis of liver enzymes included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). A negative change from baseline indicates that the level of that enzyme decreased.
Time Frame Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The mITT population, defined as all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The Safety population was defined as all participants who were randomly assigned to study treatment and who received any amount of study drug.
Arm/Group Title LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day LUM001 Overall Placebo Overall
Arm/Group Description Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 140ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 140ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 140ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 280ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 280ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 280ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received either dose of LUM001 for up to 10 or 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
Measure Participants 6 8 14 6
ALT
59.3
(20.99)
10.5
(18.06)
34.9
(13.86)
2.7
(21.06)
AST
37.2
(13.64)
-2.7
(11.70)
17.3
(8.98)
13.2
(13.63)
ALP
71.4
(53.35)
31.6
(43.59)
51.5
(36.13)
19.7
(60.76)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 140ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for ALT
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0783
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 56.7
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-7.2 to 120.6
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 280ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for ALT
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7827
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 7.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-51.4 to 67.0
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 Overall, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for ALT
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2235
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 32.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-21.9 to 86.3
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 140ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for AST
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2372
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 24.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-17.5 to 65.5
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 280ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for AST
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3914
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value -15.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-54.1 to 22.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 Overall, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for AST
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8081
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 4.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-31.0 to 39.1
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 140ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for ALP
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5748
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 51.7
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-140.3 to 243.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 280ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for ALP
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8835
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 11.9
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-158.4 to 182.2
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 Overall, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for ALP
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6917
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 31.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-135.8 to 199.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily Scores
Description The ItchRO was administered as a twice daily electronic diary (eDiary). Children ≥9 years of age completed the patient ItchRO; those between the ages of 5 and 8 completed the patient ItchRO with the assistance of their caregiver. There was no patient report for subjects under the age of 5. ItchRO scores range from 0 to 4, with the higher score indicating increasing itch severity. ItchRO average daily scores were calculated as the sum of daily scores (ie, the maximum of morning and evening scores) divided by the number of days. The average daily score was calculated by using the 7 days pre-treatment for baseline, and the last 7 days of treatment for Week 13. A negative change from Baseline indicates that itch severity decreased.
Time Frame Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The mITT population, defined as all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The Safety population was defined as all participants who were randomly assigned to study treatment and who received any amount of study drug.
Arm/Group Title LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day LUM001 Overall Placebo Overall
Arm/Group Description Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 140ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 140ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 140ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 280ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 280ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 280ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received either dose of LUM001 for up to 10 or 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
Measure Participants 6 8 14 6
Patient ItchRO
-1.159
(0.5396)
-0.608
(0.4399)
-0.883
(0.3484)
-0.811
(0.5684)
Observer ItchRO
-0.802
(0.2732)
-0.419
(0.2318)
-0.610
(0.1776)
-0.592
(0.2690)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 140ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for Patient ItchRO
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6907
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value -0.348
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.468 to 1.772
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 280ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for Patient ItchRO
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7897
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 0.202
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.647 to 2.052
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 Overall, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for Patient ItchRO
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9203
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value -0.073
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.850 to 1.705
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 140ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for Observer ItchRO
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5966
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value -0.210
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.038 to 0.618
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 280ug/kg/Day, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for Observer ItchRO
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6320
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value 0.173
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.580 to 0.926
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection LUM001 Overall, Placebo Overall
Comments Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for Observer ItchRO
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9547
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference from placebo
Estimated Value -0.019
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.710 to 0.673
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day Placebo Overall
Arm/Group Description Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 140ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 140ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 140ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 280ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 280ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 280ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment. Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
All Cause Mortality
LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day Placebo Overall
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day Placebo Overall
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/6 (0%) 0/8 (0%) 0/6 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
LUM001 140ug/kg/Day LUM001 280ug/kg/Day Placebo Overall
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 6/6 (100%) 7/8 (87.5%) 4/6 (66.7%)
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Deafness unilateral 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Ear pain 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Middle ear inflammation 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 3 0/6 (0%) 0
Abdominal pain 1/6 (16.7%) 1 5/8 (62.5%) 8 1/6 (16.7%) 5
Abdominal pain lower 1/6 (16.7%) 2 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Abdominal pain upper 1/6 (16.7%) 4 0/8 (0%) 0 1/6 (16.7%) 1
Diarrhoea 4/6 (66.7%) 5 5/8 (62.5%) 9 2/6 (33.3%) 3
Frequent bowel movements 0/6 (0%) 0 0/8 (0%) 0 1/6 (16.7%) 1
Nausea 1/6 (16.7%) 2 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Proctalgia 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Toothache 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Vomiting 0/6 (0%) 0 2/8 (25%) 2 1/6 (16.7%) 1
General disorders
Crying 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Feeling abnormal 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Malaise 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Pyrexia 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Infections and infestations
Ear infection 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Nasopharyngitis 2/6 (33.3%) 2 1/8 (12.5%) 1 1/6 (16.7%) 1
Upper respiratory tract infection 3/6 (50%) 5 1/8 (12.5%) 2 3/6 (50%) 6
Viral rash 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Anal injury 0/6 (0%) 0 2/8 (25%) 3 0/6 (0%) 0
Contusion 1/6 (16.7%) 1 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Excoriation 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Investigations
Body temperature increased 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin E deficiency 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity 1/6 (16.7%) 1 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Nervous system disorders
Headache 2/6 (33.3%) 2 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Hypoaesthesia 1/6 (16.7%) 1 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Somnolence 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal behaviour 0/6 (0%) 0 0/8 (0%) 0 1/6 (16.7%) 1
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough 1/6 (16.7%) 1 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Epistaxis 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Oropharyngeal pain 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Rhinorrhoea 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Wheezing 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Drug eruption 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0
Hyperhidrosis 0/6 (0%) 0 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Rash 1/6 (16.7%) 1 1/8 (12.5%) 1 0/6 (0%) 0
Rash generalised 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 1/6 (16.7%) 1
Rash maculo-papular 1/6 (16.7%) 1 0/8 (0%) 0 0/6 (0%) 0

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Study Physician
Organization Mirum
Phone +1 650-667-4085
Email medinfo@mirumpharma.com
Responsible Party:
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01903460
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • LUM001-302
  • 2012-005346-38
  • SHP625-302
First Posted:
Jul 19, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Mar 28, 2019
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2019