Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Following Early vs. Standard Liver Transplant for SAH

Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03845205
Collaborator
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) (NIH)
200
1
2
49.4
4.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Given the severe consequences of alcohol relapse following liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis (AH-LT), it is critical to accurately identify alcohol use and implement alcohol interventions early in the post-transplant period to optimize patient outcomes. The proposed randomized clinical trial will examine the implementation and effects of integrated, person- and computer-delivered alcohol treatment compared to standard care on alcohol use (assessed by self-report and biomarker), mood, quality of life and survival following AH-LT. Predictors of 12-month post-transplant alcohol outcomes will be explored to allow future improved tailoring and targeting of these treatments.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Integrated AUD Treatment
N/A

Detailed Description

In the United States, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the second most common indication for liver transplant (LT). Traditionally, ALD patients have been required to complete a six-month mandatory period of alcohol abstinence before LT. More recently early LT for severe alcoholic hepatitis is being performed without any pre-transplant alcohol treatment because of the high medical acuity and mortality associated with this disease. Importantly, the limited studies to-date demonstrate comparable survival among early (ELT) versus standard (SLT) transplant recipients. Return to alcohol use is a major concern for all LT recipients with ALD, with estimates of alcohol relapse ranging between 16 and 49%. Although most LT clinics have enforced pre-LT alcohol treatment, far less attention has been paid to post-LT services, despite the high risk and severe consequences of relapse during this period. Numerous evidence-based treatments are available for alcohol use disorder (AUD). In recent years, the investigators and others have developed web- and text-based versions of these empirically-supported interventions to expand the reach and replicability outside of formal alcohol clinic settings. Delivery of AUD interventions in non-traditional settings is feasible, acceptable to patients, and effective in reducing alcohol use. The investigators propose to implement and evaluate the effects of alcohol treatment integrated into routine post-LT care. All patients receive physician instructions to stop drinking and engage in alcohol services (treatment as usual: TAU). ELT (N=100) and SLT (N=100) patients will be randomized on a 2:1 basis to integrated AUD treatment (IAT) or TAU. IAT will include computer-delivered BI in the hospital, nurse-delivered alcohol monitoring counseling at each outpatient LT follow-up visit, and at-home participation in web-based, 7-session CBT4CBT, supplemented by tailored text messages. Also, because of the evidence that ALD patients significantly underreport drinking to LT providers, the investigators will compare post-LT alcohol relapse rates using a well-validated biomarker of recent drinking (PEth), patient self-report on a validated alcohol instrument, and patient report to LT provider. Finally, the investigators will identify predictors of post-LT alcohol use and treatment engagement for ELT and SLT patients. Key measures will include: alcohol use; engagement in alcohol treatment; retention in post-transplant follow-up care; mood and anxiety; and quality of life. Given the severe consequences of alcohol relapse among both ELT and SLT recipients, it is critical to accurately identify alcohol use and implement alcohol interventions early in the post-transplant period to optimize short- and long-term patient outcomes and ultimately tailor treatments for this high-risk population.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Integrated AUD treatment (IAT) v Treatment as usual (TAU)Integrated AUD treatment (IAT) v Treatment as usual (TAU)
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Research Coordinator is blinded to treatment assignment
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Following Early vs. Standard Liver Transplant for Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis (SAH)
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 20, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Integrated AUD Treatment (IAT)

IAT will include computer-delivered CBI in the hospital, nurse-delivered clinical monitoring and treatment adherence counseling, and at-home participation in web-based, 7-session computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT4CBT), supplemented by tailored text messages. Alcohol pharmacotherapy will be added to behavioral treatments as needed.

Behavioral: Integrated AUD Treatment
IAT will include computer-delivered BI in the hospital, nurse-delivered alcohol monitoring counseling at each outpatient LT follow-up visit, and at-home participation in web-based, 7-session CBT4CBT, supplemented by tailored text messages.
Other Names:
  • Computerized brief alcohol intervention (CBI)
  • CBT4CBT
  • Text Messaging
  • No Intervention: Treatment As Usual

    All LT patients receive physician instructions to not drink alcohol. Consistent with current discharge procedures, AH patients are encouraged to engage in alcohol treatment services. Patients receive regular blood draws for monitoring of liver function, and regular phone calls for post-operative monitoring.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Treatment engagement as assessed by proportion of kept LT follow-up appointments [1 year]

      Proportion of kept/scheduled LT follow-up appointments

    2. Alcohol relapse as assessed by time to first Phosphatidyl ethanol (PEth) level ≥ 8 ng/mL [1 year]

      Time to first Phosphatidyl ethanol (PEth) level ≥ 8 ng/mL (minimum detectable level)

    3. Post-liver transplant survival as assessed by time to death [1 year]

      Time to death (in months)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Alcohol relapse as assessed by Timeline Followback Interview [1 year]

      Any alcohol use reported on the Timeline Followback Interview

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • English speaking
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • too medically/psychiatrically ill to participate

    • not able to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland United States 21205

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Johns Hopkins University
    • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Mary E McCaul, PhD, Johns Hopkins University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Johns Hopkins University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03845205
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB00152700
    • P50AA027054
    First Posted:
    Feb 19, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 24, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Johns Hopkins University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 24, 2021