Phenobarbital for Acute Alcohol Withdrawal

Sponsor
Jonathan Rosenson (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01184417
Collaborator
Alameda County Medical Center (Other)
102
1
2
13.9
7.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Intravenous phenobarbital in combination with a symptom-guided standardized lorazepam-based alcohol withdrawal protocol will be associated with decreased need for ICU admission, continuous lorazepam infusion and will not be associated with increased adverse events.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline
  • Drug: placebo
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
102 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Phenobarbital Versus Placebo for Acute Alcohol Withdrawal
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Phenobarbital group

10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline

Drug: 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline
10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline

Placebo Comparator: Placebo group

100 ml saline

Drug: placebo
100 m l saline

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion [1 year]

    All study patients are placed on the standardized institutional alcohol withdrawal protocol and receive boluses of lorazepam (1, 2 or 4 mg IV) based on their acute alcohol withdrawal score (AAWS), adminstered serially up to every 15 minutes. Patients who are refractory to the maximum dose of lorazepam allowed by the protocol (up to 4mg lorazepam IV q 15 mins)are placed on a continuous IV lorazepam infusion (or "lorazepam drip"). Thus, continuous lorazepam infusion is a "yes or no" variable (i.e. continuous infusion, or not).

  2. Percentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission [1 year]

    admission to intensive care unit

  3. Total Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission [1 year]

    How much total lorazepam did each study patient receive from inital presentation in the Emergency Department through their discharge from the hospital, in milligrams.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Length of Stay [1 year]

    hospital LOS, per patient, in hours from admission to discharge

  2. Number of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability [1 year]

    The outome answeres the question "Did the study patient require endotracheal intubation, or not". This outcome investigates if the phenobarbital intervention is associted with increased incidence of respiratory depression and subsequent increased need for intubation.

  3. Percentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability [1 year]

    Did the study patient require a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) or other hospital staff to serve as a "bedside sitter" to observe the patient and provide additional safety supervision during any portion of their hospitalization.

  4. Number of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability [1 year]

    Did the study patient have a witnessed seizure during their hospitaliztion (yes/no).

  5. Number of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability [1 year]

    mortality in study patients

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Need for admission to hospital for acute alcohol withdrawal
Exclusion Criteria:
  • allergy to phenobarbital, lorazepam, age<18 or >65

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Alameda County Medical Center Oakland California United States 94608

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Jonathan Rosenson
  • Alameda County Medical Center

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jonathan Rosenson, Jonathan Rosenson MD, Alameda County Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01184417
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AlamedaCountyMC
First Posted:
Aug 19, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Mar 9, 2012
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2012
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 51 51
COMPLETED 51 51
NOT COMPLETED 0 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group Total
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 51 51 102
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
51
100%
51
100%
102
100%
>=65 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
46
(12)
48
(17)
47
(14)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
46
90.2%
45
88.2%
91
89.2%
Male
5
9.8%
6
11.8%
11
10.8%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
51
100%
51
100%
102
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion
Description All study patients are placed on the standardized institutional alcohol withdrawal protocol and receive boluses of lorazepam (1, 2 or 4 mg IV) based on their acute alcohol withdrawal score (AAWS), adminstered serially up to every 15 minutes. Patients who are refractory to the maximum dose of lorazepam allowed by the protocol (up to 4mg lorazepam IV q 15 mins)are placed on a continuous IV lorazepam infusion (or "lorazepam drip"). Thus, continuous lorazepam infusion is a "yes or no" variable (i.e. continuous infusion, or not).
Time Frame 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Measure Participants 51 51
Number [participants]
2
3.9%
16
31.4%
2. Primary Outcome
Title Percentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission
Description admission to intensive care unit
Time Frame 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Measure Participants 51 51
Number [percentage of participants]
8
15.7%
25
49%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Phenobarbital Group, Placebo Group
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 17
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
4 to 32
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
3. Primary Outcome
Title Total Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission
Description How much total lorazepam did each study patient receive from inital presentation in the Emergency Department through their discharge from the hospital, in milligrams.
Time Frame 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Measure Participants 51 51
Mean (Standard Deviation) [milligrams]
26
(45)
49
(37)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Phenobarbital Group, Placebo Group
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 23
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
4 to 49
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Length of Stay
Description hospital LOS, per patient, in hours from admission to discharge
Time Frame 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Measure Participants 51 51
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [hours]
76
118
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Phenobarbital Group, Placebo Group
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 42
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-4 to 82
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Description The outome answeres the question "Did the study patient require endotracheal intubation, or not". This outcome investigates if the phenobarbital intervention is associted with increased incidence of respiratory depression and subsequent increased need for intubation.
Time Frame 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Measure Participants 51 51
Number [participants]
0
0%
0
0%
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Description Did the study patient require a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) or other hospital staff to serve as a "bedside sitter" to observe the patient and provide additional safety supervision during any portion of their hospitalization.
Time Frame 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Measure Participants 51 51
Number [percentage of participants]
28
54.9%
22
43.1%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Phenobarbital Group, Placebo Group
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 6
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-11 to 23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Description Did the study patient have a witnessed seizure during their hospitaliztion (yes/no).
Time Frame 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Measure Participants 51 51
Number [participants]
1
2%
2
3.9%
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Description mortality in study patients
Time Frame 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
Measure Participants 51 51
Number [participants]
0
0%
0
0%

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Arm/Group Description 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline 100 ml saline
All Cause Mortality
Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/51 (0%) 0/51 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Phenobarbital Group Placebo Group
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/51 (0%) 0/51 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Jonathan Rosenson MD
Organization Alameda County Medical Center
Phone 510-407-6743
Email jonrosenson@yahoo.com
Responsible Party:
Jonathan Rosenson, Jonathan Rosenson MD, Alameda County Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01184417
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AlamedaCountyMC
First Posted:
Aug 19, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Mar 9, 2012
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2012