Alcohol Self Administration Laboratory
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a pilot study in which our intent is to establish an alcohol administration laboratory in which we will be able to test the effect of the anticonvulsant medication zonisamide as compared to placebo on alcohol self administration and on cognitive functioning in non treatment seeking heavy users of alcohol. Our first goal is to establish the safety of zonisamide when used together with alcohol. Our second goal is to test the effect of an acute dose of zonisamide on alcohol consumption and show that it may reduce the consumption of alcohol. To achieve this goal we seek subjects with a history of heavy drinking to be tested on the self-administration procedures described below in two sessions with either zonisamide or placebo. These procedures will involve first, the administration of a challenge dose of ethanol to evaluate the effect of alcohol on performance on neuropsychological tests. This initial challenge will be followed by a period of alcohol self-administration in which the research subject can choose to select either ethanol or another reinforcer, money.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
In preclinical studies three novel anticonvulsants have been studied. The administration of tiagabine did not decrease ethanol consumption in rodents (Schmitt et al., 2002; Rimondini et al., 2002). In a study with alcohol preferring mice topiramate reduced alcohol consumption in a two bottle choice prolonged access model of drinking (Gabriel and Cunningham, 2005). In a study done at our laboratory both topiramate and zonisamide were found to have similar effects on reducing the consumption of ethanol in Wistar rat (Knapp et al., 2004). More recently we found that zonisamide administration decreased alcohol consumption in a limited access model in the C57BL/B6 mouse. These results suggest that zonisamide might be useful as a medication for the treatment of alcohol dependence.
Topiramate and zonisamide have some structural similarities with a sulfamate or methane-sulfonamide containing chain respectively attached to cyclic structure. These structural similarities may explain some of their pharmacological similarities including blockade of voltage sensitive sodium channels and low potency inhibition of carbonic anhydrase (Taverna et al., 1999; Dodgson et al., 2000; Schaf et al., 1987; Masudaet al., 1993). Both topiramate and zonisamide promote weight loss (McElroy et al., 2003; McElroy et al., 2004; Gadde et al., 2003). This effect may be a result of neuromodulation of the regulation of alcohol and food shared by these drugs.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Zonisamide
|
Drug: zonisamide
zonisamide (100 mg)one time
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
Drug: Placebo
Placebo Comparator
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Grams Ethanol Consumed During Second Hour of the Alcohol Self-Administration Sessions [1 day]
Grams Ethanol Consumed During Second Hour of the Alcohol Self-Administration Sessions for Zonisamide and Placebo Conditions
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Score Digit Symbol Modalities Test [40 minutes post alcohol ingestion]
Difference score between zonisamide and placebo treatment conditions for the Digit Symbol Modalities Test scores obtained 40 minutes after ingestion of a priming dose of ethanol.This test involves transcribing from a key in which numbers appear below a series of symbols to boxes below symbols matched to those in the key. This task must be completed in 90 nseconds. This test measures visuomotor speed and aspects of attention. Scoring is the total number of correctly transcribed numbers. The maximum score on this test 110 points.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Non treatment seeking subjects ages 21-55 must indicate no treatment for alcohol dependence in the preceding 6 months.
-
Male subjects must drink no more than 40 standard drinks; female subjects no more than 35 standard drinks a week as determined by the TLFB
-
Subjects must be able to provide IC
-
BAC must be 0.000 at the time of consent
-
Female subjects of a child bearing potential must use an acceptable method of contraception which includes a barrier and spermicide, levonorgestrel implant, medroxyprogesterone, intrauterine progesterone contraceptive system or complete abstinence or surgical sterilization. Women who are using oral contraceptives must agree to an additional barrier method.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subject meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for axis I diagnosis that require pharmacological treatment.
-
Subject meeting substance dependence criteria for any substance other than alcohol or nicotine .
-
Positive urine toxicology screen for opioids, cocaine, amphetamines, PCP, THC (may repeat THC if positive).
-
History of severe alcohol withdrawals.
-
Any medical or psychological condition that in the opinion of the investigator will preclude safe participation in the trial. These include a history of kidney stones in the past 10 years, significant liver disease with AST and ALT more than 3 times the normal range.
-
Concomitant medications that will alter the pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties of the study medication. Participant who are taking the following medications: Amprenavir; Atazanavir; Clarithromycin; Delavirdine; Diclofenac; Fosamprenavir; Imatinib; Indinavir; Isoniazid; Itraconazole; Ketoconazole; Miconazole; Nefazodone; Nelfinavir; NiCARdipine; Propofol; Quinidine; Ritonavir; Telithromycin; Phenytoin; carbamazepine and phenobarbital
-
Subjects on psychoactive medications must be on a stable dose more than 3 months
-
Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing.
-
Subject is facing future imprisonment.
-
A known allergy to zonisamide or sulfa.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Boston University Medical Campus | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02118 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Boston University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ofra Sarid-Segal, MD, Boston University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- H-25360
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In this within subjects study, subjects received zonisamide in one session and placebo in a second |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In this within subjects study, subjects received zonisamide in one session and placebo in a second |
Overall Participants | 10 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
10
100%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
7
70%
|
Male |
3
30%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
10
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Grams Ethanol Consumed During Second Hour of the Alcohol Self-Administration Sessions |
---|---|
Description | Grams Ethanol Consumed During Second Hour of the Alcohol Self-Administration Sessions for Zonisamide and Placebo Conditions |
Time Frame | 1 day |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
This was a laboratory based study. An ITT analysis was used. |
Arm/Group Title | Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In this within subjects study, subjects received zonisamide in one session and placebo in a second |
Measure Participants | 10 |
Zonisamide |
9.0
(3.7)
|
Placebo |
18.2
(3.1)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions |
---|---|---|
Comments | The analysis involved a within subjects comparison. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the amount of ethanol consumed in either the first or second hour of self-administration sessions. Results presented here are for the second hour of the self-administration sessions. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | Results presented are for post-hoc comparisons of least squares means with Tukey-Kramer adjucted p values. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -9.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
() 95% to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 3.4 |
|
Estimation Comments | The estimated value is for the difference between the means obtained for the second hour of the self-administration sessions for the placebo and zonisamide conditions. |
Title | Score Digit Symbol Modalities Test |
---|---|
Description | Difference score between zonisamide and placebo treatment conditions for the Digit Symbol Modalities Test scores obtained 40 minutes after ingestion of a priming dose of ethanol.This test involves transcribing from a key in which numbers appear below a series of symbols to boxes below symbols matched to those in the key. This task must be completed in 90 nseconds. This test measures visuomotor speed and aspects of attention. Scoring is the total number of correctly transcribed numbers. The maximum score on this test 110 points. |
Time Frame | 40 minutes post alcohol ingestion |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT |
Arm/Group Title | Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In this within subjects study, subjects received zonisamide in one session and placebo in a second |
Measure Participants | 10 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Numeric Score] |
2.2
(5.7)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis: No difference in DSMT scores for zonisamide and placebo treatments 40 minutes after ingestion of ethanol. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.61 |
Comments | P value shown is for a post-hoc comparison of least squares means generated by the mixed model used. | |
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 2.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
() 95% to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 5.7 |
|
Estimation Comments | Analysis for difference between DSMT scores at 40 minutes post alcohol ingestion for zonisamide and placebo involved post-hoc comparisons of least squares means. |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions | |
Arm/Group Description | In this within subjects study, subjects received zonisamide in one session and placebo in a second | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Zonisamide-Placebo Sessions | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Ofra Sarid-Segal, MD |
---|---|
Organization | Boston University |
Phone | 617-414-1990 |
ofra.segal@bmc.org |
- H-25360