Intranasal Steroids and Oxymetazoline in Allergic Rhinitis

Sponsor
University of Chicago (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00584987
Collaborator
GlaxoSmithKline (Industry)
64
1
4
25
2.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

We hypothesize that once daily use of oxymetazoline will not cause significant rhinitis medicamentosa and that the combination of fluticasone furoate plus oxymetazoline leads to faster relief of nasal congestion secondary to perennial allergic rhinitis than the use of fluticasone furoate alone.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Fluticasone furoate
  • Drug: Placebo Fluticasone furoate
  • Drug: Oxymetazoline
  • Drug: Placebo Oxymetazoline
Phase 4

Detailed Description

We performed a 6-week, 4-group, parallel, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, clinical trial in 60 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. After an initial screening with an allergy questionnaire and skin puncture testing to confirm an allergic response to a perennial allergen (cat, dog, dust mite, indoor mold), qualified individuals were randomized into 1 of 4 treatment groups. The 4 groups received the following treatments: placebo, OXY (0.05%, 2 puffs in each nostril every evening), FF nasal spray (110 mg per day), and FF nasal spray plus OXY (FF/OXY). All participants received 2 nasal sprays at night, with 1 spray containing FF or its placebo, the other oxymetazoline or its placebo. The nasal sprays were labeled with participant code numbers, and the investigator assigned participants in a sequential randomized fashion to a study code number in blocks of 4. Dropouts were replaced until 60 subjects were randomized. Replacement subjects were assigned the next sequential treatment. Thus, the number of subjects in each group was not exactly 15.

Eligible participants completed the Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and underwent measurement of nasal volume by acoustic rhinometry before starting the study. Participants were instructed to keep a diary of daily symptoms, nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) meter readings, and medication use during the study; no rescue medications were allowed. The severity of sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and other symptoms was recorded in the morning (reflective of symptoms overnight) and evening (reflective of daytime symptoms) on a 0 to 3 scale. Intake of the study medication was performed once daily, at night, after recording of symptoms and NPIF values. Subjects returned to the nasal laboratory every 2 weeks for a total of 4 weeks for review of the symptom diaries, replacement of medications, performance of acoustic rhinometry, and completion of the RQLQ. After the fourth week, participants stopped treatment, returned medication, and continued with the clinical trial for 2 additional weeks. During this time, they maintained symptom diaries and NPIF measurements twice daily. At the end of the 2-week period, participants returned to the nasal laboratory to perform a final acoustic rhinometry, complete an RQLQ survey, and return the diaries.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
64 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Combination of Intranasal Steroid/Oxymetazoline Leads to Faster Relief of Nasal Congestion Without Inducing Rhinitis Medicamentosa
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo FF + Placebo OXY

Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Drug: Placebo Fluticasone furoate
2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Drug: Placebo Oxymetazoline
2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Active Comparator: FF + Placebo OXY

Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Drug: Fluticasone furoate
2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
Other Names:
  • Veramyst
  • Drug: Placebo Oxymetazoline
    2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

    Active Comparator: Placebo FF + OXY

    Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

    Drug: Placebo Fluticasone furoate
    2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

    Drug: Oxymetazoline
    2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Other Names:
  • Oxymetazoline hydrochloride
  • Active Comparator: FF + OXY

    Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

    Drug: Fluticasone furoate
    2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Other Names:
  • Veramyst
  • Drug: Oxymetazoline
    2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Other Names:
  • Oxymetazoline hydrochloride
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Total Nasal Congestion Symptom Score [28 days of treatment]

      The severity of nasal congestion was recorded in the morning (reflective of symptoms overnight) and evening (reflective of daytime symptoms) on a 0 to 3 scale. The total nasal congestion symptom score was obtained by adding the symptoms obtained on all 28 days of treatment. Values for this outcome are in the range of 0 to 168 (i.e., 6 x 28). Congestion scores increase with congestion severity (i.e., higher numbers correspond to worse congestion).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. RQLQ Score [Baseline] [assessed at baseline]

      The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.

    2. RQLQ Score [2 Weeks] [assessed 2 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen]

      The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.

    3. RQLQ Score [4 Weeks] [assessed 4 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen]

      The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.

    4. RQLQ Score [6 Weeks] [assessed 6 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen]

      The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.

    5. Total NPIF [days 2 through 28 of the treatment cycle]

      Nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) is a physiological measure of nasal airflow which is particularly sensitive to nasal valve collapse. NPIF was measured objectively in liters per minute with an In-Check Peak Inspiratory FlowMeter (Ferraris Medical Inc, Orchard Park, NY). Subjects obtained 3 readings every morning and every evening and recorded the best flow measured. The morning and evening NPIF measurements were summed for days 2 through 28 of the treatment cycle, yielding the total NPIF outcome measure. NPIF scores increase with air flow quality (i.e., higher NPIF values are indicative of better nasal air flow).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 55 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Males and females between 18 and 55 years of age.

    2. History of perennial allergic rhinitis.

    3. Positive skin test to dust mite, dog, cat or indoor mold antigen.

    4. And a combined nasal morning and evening score of ≥4 for nasal congestion in the day preceding entry

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Physical signs or symptoms suggestive of renal, hepatic or cardiovascular disease.

    2. Pregnant or lactating women.

    3. Subjects treated with systemic steroids during the previous 30 days.

    4. Subjects treated with topical (inhaled, intranasal or intraocular) steroids, Nasalcrom or Opticrom during the previous 30 days.

    5. Subjects treated with oral antihistamine/decongestants during the previous seven days.

    6. Subjects treated with topical (intranasal or intraocular) antihistamine/decongestants during the previous 3 days.

    7. Subjects treated with immunotherapy and are escalating their dose.

    8. Subjects on chronic anti-asthma medications.

    9. Subjects with polyps in the nose or a significantly displaced septum.

    10. Upper respiratory infection within 14 days of study start.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Chicago Chicago Illinois United States 60637

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Chicago
    • GlaxoSmithKline

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Robert M Naclerio, MD, University of Chicago

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Robert Naclerio, MD, University of Chicago
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00584987
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 15059B
    First Posted:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 17, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2013

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title PL FF + PL OXY FF + PL OXY PL FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 15 16 17 16
    COMPLETED 14 15 16 15
    NOT COMPLETED 1 1 1 1

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY Total
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 15 16 17 16 64
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    29.6
    (11)
    31.7
    (9.5)
    26.6
    (5.2)
    28.6
    (8.7)
    28.8
    (8.5)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    10
    66.7%
    12
    75%
    10
    58.8%
    9
    56.3%
    41
    64.1%
    Male
    5
    33.3%
    4
    25%
    7
    41.2%
    7
    43.8%
    23
    35.9%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Total Nasal Congestion Symptom Score
    Description The severity of nasal congestion was recorded in the morning (reflective of symptoms overnight) and evening (reflective of daytime symptoms) on a 0 to 3 scale. The total nasal congestion symptom score was obtained by adding the symptoms obtained on all 28 days of treatment. Values for this outcome are in the range of 0 to 168 (i.e., 6 x 28). Congestion scores increase with congestion severity (i.e., higher numbers correspond to worse congestion).
    Time Frame 28 days of treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Measure Participants 14 15 16 15
    Median (Full Range) [units on a scale]
    94
    70
    75
    68
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title RQLQ Score [Baseline]
    Description The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.
    Time Frame assessed at baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Measure Participants 14 15 16 15
    Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale]
    3.07
    (0.28)
    3.25
    (0.29)
    2.99
    (0.28)
    2.60
    (0.22)
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title RQLQ Score [2 Weeks]
    Description The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.
    Time Frame assessed 2 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Measure Participants 14 15 16 15
    Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale]
    2.20
    (0.26)
    2.03
    (0.26)
    2.11
    (0.20)
    1.62
    (0.24)
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title RQLQ Score [4 Weeks]
    Description The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.
    Time Frame assessed 4 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Measure Participants 14 15 16 15
    Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale]
    1.75
    (0.24)
    1.37
    (0.24)
    1.85
    (0.20)
    1.26
    (0.22)
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title RQLQ Score [6 Weeks]
    Description The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.
    Time Frame assessed 6 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Measure Participants 14 15 16 15
    Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale]
    1.85
    (0.25)
    1.83
    (0.33)
    2.03
    (0.27)
    1.55
    (0.19)
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Total NPIF
    Description Nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) is a physiological measure of nasal airflow which is particularly sensitive to nasal valve collapse. NPIF was measured objectively in liters per minute with an In-Check Peak Inspiratory FlowMeter (Ferraris Medical Inc, Orchard Park, NY). Subjects obtained 3 readings every morning and every evening and recorded the best flow measured. The morning and evening NPIF measurements were summed for days 2 through 28 of the treatment cycle, yielding the total NPIF outcome measure. NPIF scores increase with air flow quality (i.e., higher NPIF values are indicative of better nasal air flow).
    Time Frame days 2 through 28 of the treatment cycle

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    Measure Participants 14 15 16 15
    Median (Full Range) [liters per minute]
    5240
    5680
    4485.5
    5520

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Subjects were monitored for adverse events 2 weeks after treatment as outlined in the protocol. No subjects presented with adverse events after the official follow-up period concluded.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
    All Cause Mortality
    Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/15 (0%) 0/16 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/16 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Placebo FF + Placebo OXY FF + Placebo OXY Placebo FF + OXY FF + OXY
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 2/15 (13.3%) 4/16 (25%) 2/17 (11.8%) 2/16 (12.5%)
    General disorders
    Headaches 2/15 (13.3%) 4/16 (25%) 2/17 (11.8%) 2/16 (12.5%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr. Robert M. Naclerio, MD
    Organization The University of Chicago
    Phone (773) 702-1865
    Email rnacleri@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Robert Naclerio, MD, University of Chicago
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00584987
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 15059B
    First Posted:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 17, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2013