The Effect of Desloratadine and Levocetirizine on Nasal Obstruction (Study P03609)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This was a study to measure the ability of desloratadine and levocetirizine to decrease nasal obstruction in subjects who had study-induced allergic rhinitis. Study participants had allergic rhinitis symptoms induced in a Vienna Challenge Chamber and then received desloratadine or levocetirizine for 8 days. After at least a 10 to 35-day washout period (time when no drug is given), subjects received the opposite treatment for 8 days. Subjects had their total nasal symptom measured.on the 8th day of each treatment period.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: desloratadine followed by levocetirizine Subjects in this arm received desloratadine 5 mg daily for 8 days, followed by 10 day washout period, then followed by levocetirizine 5 mg daily for 8 days |
Drug: desloratadine
desloratadine 5 mg daily x 8 days
Other Names:
Drug: levocetirizine
levocetirizine 5 mg daily x 8 days
Other Names:
|
Experimental: levocetirizine followed by desloratadine Subjects in this arm received levocetirizine 5 mg daily for 8 days, followed by 10 day washout period, then followed by desloratadine 5 mg daily for 8 days |
Drug: desloratadine
desloratadine 5 mg daily x 8 days
Other Names:
Drug: levocetirizine
levocetirizine 5 mg daily x 8 days
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at the end of treatment phase compared to pre-exposure baseline scores [End of each treatment phase (8th day)]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF), Nasal secretion weights, nasal airflow, individual nasal symptoms, TNSS, Total Non-Nasal Symptoms Severity Score (TNNSS), Total Symptom Score (TSS) [End of each treatment phase (8th day)]
- Safety [All study visits]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
18 to 45 years of age
-
Were free of any clinically significant disease that would interfere with study evaluations.
-
Demonstrated hypersensitivity to the grass allergen used in the chamber unless confirmed previously within 12 months.
-
Hypersensitivity to the allergen was documented by a positive response to the skin prick test with a wheal diameter at least 3 mm larger than the diluent control and by a radioallergosorbent test (RAST) class of >=2 (rating scale 0 -6).
-
Had a history of SAR for at least 2 years, as diagnosed by the investigator, another physician, or subject-provided history.
-
Reported having shown therapeutic efficacy with previous use of an antihistamine (without a decongestant).
-
At the screening allergen provocation, the subject had a nasal obstruction symptom severity score of at least moderate (>=2) and a decrease from baseline in nasal airflow (mL/sec) measured by rhinomanometry of >=30% within 2 hours of allergen exposure. Also, the subject had a nasal obstruction symptom severity score of none or mild (<=1) prior to exposure to allergen.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Women who were pregnant or nursing.
-
Had a body mass index (BMI) >=30 kg/m^2.
-
Had asthma; were being treated with inhaled or oral corticosteroids, chromones, theophylline, leukotriene inhibitors, or short-acting inhaled β2-agonists (except during or immediately after the allergen exposures); and could not go through the washout periods and the entire study without needing these medications.
-
Developed wheezing or dyspnea during the screening allergen exposure.
-
Had a respiratory infection during the 4 weeks prior to pre-dose evaluations.
-
Had any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination that, in the investigator's judgment, could interfere with the study evaluation or affect subject safety.
-
Had any history of or laboratory evidence of hepatic failure or renal failure with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) known to be <30 mL/min.
-
Had a known potential for hypersensitivity, allergic, or idiosyncratic reaction to the study drug or excipients.
-
Had nasal structural abnormalities, including large nasal polyps and marked septum deviation, that significantly interfered with nasal airflow.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Organon and Co
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- P03609