Home-based tDCS for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease

Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04855643
Collaborator
Texas Alzheimer's Research and Care Consortium (Other)
40
1
2
25.3
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess feasibility, acceptability, and safety of providing tDCS to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) patients with apathy and to assess the efficacy of tDCS for ADRD-related symptoms, with a primary focus on apathy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: home-based active tDCS
  • Device: home-based sham tDCS
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD)
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 20, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Treatment

Device: home-based active tDCS
Anode and cathode electrodes will be placed over the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortexes, respectively, with the use of the Omni-Lateral-Electrode system. Caregivers will set up and administer tDCS for participants with ADRD at home. tDCS will be applied for 30 min at an intensity of 2mA, with 30 s ramping up and down. All sessions will be remotely supervised by trained research staff.

Sham Comparator: Control Group

Device: home-based sham tDCS
For sham stimulation, electric current will be applied only in the first 30s tDCS. All sessions will be remotely supervised by trained research staff.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of participants included and who successfully completed the protocol. [through study completion, an average of 3 years]

    The feasibility will be assessed based on the recruitment rate (per month), randomization success, blind success, retention, and attrition rates.

  2. How satisfied the patient was with the treatment as measured by the tDCS experience questionnaire. [Baseline]

    Acceptability will be measured using a Likert scale composed by 10 questions, each one ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree).

  3. How satisfied the patient was with the treatment as measured by the tDCS experience questionnaire. [2 weeks of treatment]

    Acceptability will be measured using a Likert scale composed by 10 questions, each one ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree).

  4. How satisfied the patient was with the treatment as measured by the tDCS experience questionnaire. [4 weeks of treatment]

    Acceptability will be measured using a Likert scale composed by 10 questions, each one ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree).

  5. How satisfied the patient was with the treatment as measured by the tDCS experience questionnaire. [6 weeks of treatment]

    Acceptability will be measured using a Likert scale composed by 10 questions, each one ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree).

  6. How satisfied the patient was with the treatment as measured by the tDCS experience questionnaire. [6 weeks post-treatment]

    Acceptability will be measured using a Likert scale composed by 10 questions, each one ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree).

  7. How safe home-based tDCS treatment is as measured by reporting side effects. [Baseline]

    Safety will be assessed with a questionnaire about side effects that include itching, burning, headache, fatigue, and dizziness.

  8. How safe home-based tDCS treatment is as measured by reporting side effects. [2 weeks of treatment]

    Safety will be assessed with a questionnaire about side effects that include itching, burning, headache, fatigue, and dizziness.

  9. How safe home-based tDCS treatment is as measured by reporting side effects. [4 weeks of treatment]

    Safety will be assessed with a questionnaire about side effects that include itching, burning, headache, fatigue, and dizziness.

  10. How safe home-based tDCS treatment is as measured by reporting side effects. [6 weeks of treatment]

    Safety will be assessed with a questionnaire about side effects that include itching, burning, headache, fatigue, and dizziness.

  11. How safe home-based tDCS treatment is as measured by reporting side effects. [6 weeks post-treatment]

    Safety will be assessed with a questionnaire about side effects that include itching, burning, headache, fatigue, and dizziness.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in apathy as assessed by the Brief Dimensional Apathy Scale (b-DAS) [Baseline, treatment week 2, treatment week 4, treatment week 6, and 6 weeks post-treatment.]

    This scale consists of 9 questions each one scored from 0(almost always) to 3(hardly ever)

  2. Change in dementia-related behavioral symptoms as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Q) scale [Baseline, treatment week 2, treatment week 4, treatment week 6, and 6 weeks post-treatment.]

    NPI-Q evaluates 12 discrete neuropsychiatric symptoms considering their severity and the related caregiver distress.

  3. Change in depressive symptoms as assessed by the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia [Baseline, treatment week 6, and 6 weeks post-treatment.]

    This scale consists of 19 questions and each question is scored on a two-point scale: 0 = absent; 1 = mild or intermittent; 2 = severe; n / a = unable to evaluate

  4. Change in cognition as evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [Baseline, treatment week 6, and 6 weeks post-treatment.]

    Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) includes memory, language, praxis and orientation tasks, yielding a global cognition score ranging 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better performance.

  5. Change in apathy as measured by the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) [Baseline, treatment week 2, treatment week 4, treatment week 6, and 6 weeks post-treatment.]

    18 items phrased as questions that are to be answered by the caregiver on a four-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater severity of apathy.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
60 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosis of possible or probable ADRD according to the National Institute of Aging - Alzheimer's Association diagnostic criteria

  • Clinically meaningful apathy for at least four weeks, clinically diagnosed according to 2018 Apathy Diagnostic Criteria or defined as Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Q) apathy score equal or above 4 (i.e., severity of 'moderate' or greater and caregiver distress 'mild' or greater).

  • Stable doses of cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine and other psychotropic medications for at least three months.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Unstable medical conditions

  • History of epilepsy

  • Metallic objects in the brain

  • Diagnosis of major depression and/or a score higher than 18 on the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas United States 77030

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
  • Texas Alzheimer's Research and Care Consortium

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio L Teixeira Jr, MD.PhD,MSc, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Antonio L. Teixeira, Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04855643
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HSC-MS-21-0089
First Posted:
Apr 22, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Nov 17, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 17, 2021