Telephone-delivered Mindfulness Intervention for African American Dementia Caregivers

Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04058886
Collaborator
National Institute on Aging (NIA) (NIH)
64
1
1
30.5
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is assesses the feasibility and acceptability of telephone-delivered mindfulness training designed to alleviate caregiver burden for African-American rural caregivers of individuals with moderate to severe dementia, as defined by the caregiver. The study utilizes a single-group, uncontrolled design to test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for the target population.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Telephone-delivered Mindfulness
N/A

Detailed Description

Mindfulness interventions can decrease caregiver burden and improve coping skills, including decreased emotion-based coping, increased tolerance for uncertainty, improved psychological well-being and quality of life while potentially improving relationship quality and communication.

This study utilizes a single-group, uncontrolled design to assess the feasibility and acceptability of telephone-delivered mindfulness training designed to alleviate caregiver burden for African-American rural caregivers of individuals with moderate to severe dementia, as defined by the caregiver. The telephone-delivered mindfulness intervention will improve geographical access for rural caregivers and deem more flexible for a caregiver's schedule. The study's intervention consists of mindfulness training delivered by telephone once weekly for 8 weeks. The intervention also includes one in-person 3.5-hour retreat for which respite care will be provided. The intervention, based on, Kabat-Zinn's mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), will emphasize the following: 1) mindful experiencing, including mindfulness of feelings and body sensations; 2) mindful communication, including non-verbal mindfulness, mindful listening, and mindful speaking; and 3) mindful compassion for self and others.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
64 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Easing the Burden of Dementia Caregiving: A Telephone-delivered Mindfulness Intervention for Rural, African American Families
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 15, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Telephone-delivered Mindfulness

Participating caregivers and care partners will receive mindfulness training in 8 weekly telephone sessions plus one 3.5-hour retreat. Respite care for the care recipient is provided for the retreat.

Behavioral: Telephone-delivered Mindfulness
The telephone-delivered mindfulness training intervention that will incorporate the following elements: 1) training for primary caregivers (CG) and their caregiving partner (CP) in a telephone-based mindfulness training intervention; 2) groups of up to eight participants (four CG-CP pairs) plus an instructor, on a shared telephone line; and 3) training in a 8-week, modified MBSR program, which places additional emphasis on training in the following: a) mindful experiencing, including mindfulness of feelings and body sensations; b) mindful communication, including non-verbal mindfulness, mindful listening, and mindful speaking; and c) mindful compassion for self and others. Additionally, homework assignments will involve listening to exercises on a dial-in telephone line; and assignments for CG-CP dyads (e.g. mindful listening and communication practices) as well as CG mindfulness practices in the presence of care recipients (e.g. mindful eating, and mindful listening).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of telephone sessions attended [8 weeks]

    The instructor will conduct a role call to take attendance at the beginning of each of the 8 class sessions. Attending 6 out of 9 sessions signifies intervention acceptability. Attendance used as a proxy to assess intervention acceptability.

  2. Total number of individuals screened for enrollment [Pre-intervention]

    The total number of participants screened for eligibility will be used as a proxy to assess recruitment feasibility in this geographic area.

  3. Proportion of screened individuals who qualify for enrollment [Pre-intervention]

    Proportion measured by the number of eligible individuals screened for enrollment divided by the total number of individuals screened for enrollment. This is used as a proxy to assess recruitment feasibility in this geographic area.

  4. Number of qualifiers who enroll [Pre-intervention]

    The number of eligible individuals who enroll in the study will be divided by the total number of eligible individuals screened. Recruitment feasibility will be reached if 75% of the total number of eligible individuals screened enroll into the study. This is used as proxy to assess study feasibility.

  5. Number enrolled who complete the intervention [8 weeks]

    The number of participants enrolled who complete the intervention. Feasibility will be reached if 80% of those enrolled complete the intervention. This is used as a proxy to assess recruitment feasibility.

  6. Total number of Interviews completed with intervention participants [8 weeks]

    The total number of interviews completed with those who participated in the intervention will be used to assess adherence and feedback about the study protocol. A study-specific interview guide will be used to conduct interviews with participants who complete the intervention and who dropout of the intervention. Interviews will collect information about the timing of sessions, satisfaction with intervention format, components fostering engagement in intervention group/materials, and factors leading to dropout, where applicable. A study-specific tracking sheet will be used to note the total number of interviews completed. This is used as a proxy to assess adherence to the study protocol.

  7. Total number of audio recordings of intervention sessions [8 weeks]

    The total number of audio recordings of intervention sessions will be used to asses program fidelity. Each intervention session will be audio recorded to identify any systematic variations in instructor attitude, instructor communication, behavior between groups, group-dependent differences in content/style between instructor/participants, and participant input during sessions. This is used as a proxy to assess program fidelity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Emotional Distress-Anxiety-Short Form 4a [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety-Short Form 4a is a 4-item scale that assesses fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness), and somatic symptoms related to arousal (racing heart, dizziness). It uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=always). Raw scores range from 4-20 with lower scores representing less endorsement of anxiety. This item will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  2. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Emotional Distress-Anger-Short Form 5a [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anger-Short Form 5a item is a 5-item scale that assesses angry mood (irritability, frustration), negative social cognitions (interpersonal sensitivity, envy, disagreeableness), and efforts to control anger. It uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=always). Raw scores range from 5-25 with lower scores reflecting less endorsement of anger. This scale will be administered at baseline at 8 weeks.

  3. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Meaning and Purpose-Short Form 6a [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The PROMIS Meaning and Purpose-Short Form 6a is a 6-item scale that assesses a sense that life has purpose and there are good reasons for living, including hopefulness, optimism, goal-directedness, and feelings that one's life is worthy. It is a reliable, validated, population-normed well-being measure developed to assess positive emotions. It uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Raw scores range from 6-30 with higher scores representing more endorsement of meaning and life.This item will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  4. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical Health [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The PROMIS Global Physical Health is a 2-item scale that assesses overall evaluation of one's physical health. It is based on the well-validated Rand measure, assessing general self-rated physical health, physical function, pain, and fatigue. It has a marginal reliability of 0.81. It uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=poor to 5=excellent). Raw scores range from 2-10 with higher scores representing more endorsement of good physical health. PROMIS Global Physical Health will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  5. Change from baseline on Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)-Short Form [baseline, 8 weeks]

    Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)-Short Form is an 18-item measure consisting of 5 positive coping strategies (acceptance, positive refocusing, planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective) and 4 negative strategies (rumination, catastrophizing, self-blame, other-blame). Subscale reliability (α=0.68-0.81) and convergent validity was good. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1=(almost) never to 5=(almost) always). Total scores range from 18-90 with higher scores representing more cognitive emotional regulation and higher subscale scores represent more of a specific strategy being used. The CERQ will be administered at baseline and at 8 weeks.

  6. Change from baseline on Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12) [baseline, 8 weeks]

    Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12) is a 12 item measure consisting of 2 factors: prospective anxiety (7 items) and inhibitory anxiety ( 5 items). It correlates highly (0.96) with the original 27-item scale. Its reliability was high for both the overall score (ρ=0.92) and factors. It demonstrated convergent validity. The measure uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all like me to 5=entirely like me). Total scores range from 12-60, with lower scores reflecting more tolerance of uncertain situations. IUS-12 will be administered at baseline and at 8 weeks.

  7. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Emotional Support-Short Form 4a [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The PROMIS Emotional Support-Short Form 4a is a 4-item scale that assesses perceived feelings of being cared for and valued as a person and having confidant relationships. Item responses use a 5-point LIkert scale (1=never to 5=always). Raw scores range from 4-20 with higher scores reflecting more positive endorsement of emotional support. PROMIS Emotional Support item will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  8. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Informational Support-Short Form 4a [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The PROMIS Informational Support-Short Form 4a is a 4-item scale that assesses perceived availability of helpful information or advice. Item responses use a 5-point LIkert scale (1=never to 5=always). Raw scores range from 4-20 with higher scores reflecting more positive endorsement of informational support. This item will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  9. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instrumental Support-Short Form 4a [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The PROMIS Instrumental Support-Short Form 4a is a 4-item scale that assesses perceived availability of assistance with material, cognitive or task performance. Item responses use a 5-point LIkert scale (1=never to 5=always). Raw scores range from 4-20 with higher scores reflecting more positive endorsement of instrumental support. This item will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  10. Change from baseline on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The CAMS-R is a 12-item scale measuring mindfulness by using language that is not representative of any particular meditation training or practice. It uses a 4-point Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (Rarely/Not at all) to 4 (Almost always). Total scores range from 12-48. Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness. CAMS-R will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  11. Change from baseline on Family Satisfaction Scale (FSS) [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The FSS is a 10-item scale has test retest reliability of 0.85 and alpha of 0.92. Convergent validity demonstrated in survivors of traumatic brain injury. Mean in sample of 2,465 = 37.5 with a standard deviation of 8.5. The measure uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=very dissatisfied to 5=extremely satisfied). Total scores range from 10-50 with higher scores representing more endorsement of family satisfaction. FSS will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  12. Change from baseline on Family Conflict Scale (FCS) [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The FCS is a 12 item scale that measures the degree of conflict the family experiences about the seriousness of the care recipient's condition, concerns about the care recipient's safety, what the care recipient can do for him/herself, and whether a nursing home is indicated. It has the 3 subscales: 1) conflict around definitions of the illness and strategies for care (4 items), 2) conflict around family members' attitudes and action toward the patient (4 items), and 3) conflict around family members' actions and attitudes around the caregiver (4 items). Items are measured on a 4-point Likert scale (1=no disagreement to 4=quite a bit of disagreement). The total scores range from 12-48 with lower scores representing less family conflict. FCS will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  13. Change from baseline on Zarit Burden Interview Short Form (ZBI-12) [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The ZBI-12 is a 12-item (SF) version of the original 29-item questionnaire measures role strain (α=0.88) and personal strain (α=0.77). The short form was highly correlated with the original (0.96) both at baseline and follow-up. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0=never to 4=nearly always). Scores range from 0-48 with lower scores representing less burden. ZBI will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  14. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) General Self-Efficacy-Short Form 4a [baseline, 8 weeks]

    PROMIS General Self-Efficacy-Short Form 4a is a 4-item scale that assesses confidence in ability to successfully perform specific tasks or behaviors related to one's health in a variety of situations. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1=I am not at all confident to 5=I am very confident). Raw scores range from 4-20 with higher scores representing more confidence. This measure will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

  15. Change from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Managing Emotions-Short Form 4a [baseline, 8 weeks]

    The PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Emotions-Short Form 4a is a 4-item scale that assesses confidence to manage/control symptoms of anxiety, depression, helplessness, discouragement, frustration, disappointment and anger. Items are measured using a 5-point Likert scale (1=I am not at all confident to 5=I am very confident). Raw scores range from 4-20 with higher scores indicating more confidence with managing emotion. This measure will be administered at baseline and 8 weeks.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • The candidate is at least 18 years old;

  • The candidate self-identifies as Black or African American;

  • The candidate provides at least 4 hours of care per day to the care recipient, who must have either a diagnosis of dementia OR a score of at least 5 on the Functional Assessment Staging of Alzheimer's disease (FAST) scale (indicative of moderate - severe dementia);

  • The candidate is able to identify and recruit an additional informal caregiver (care partner) to participate in the study. The care partner must consider themselves as part of the caregiving team that helps to make decisions about the care of the care recipient. The care partner may be a blood relative or close friend, but not a formal caregiver. The care partner need not live in the same geographic area.

  • Both the candidate primary caregiver and care partner must have access to a telephone and express a willingness to participate in the pre- and post-participation assessments, the intervention calls, and the intervention retreat.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • The candidate is too unwell to participate; e.g., with an active diagnosis of cancer or more than 3 hospitalizations in the past year;

  • The candidate has participated in prior mindfulness training;

  • The candidate reports a history of serious mental illness (i.e., psychosis) requiring more than two psychotropic medications per day or hospitalization for a psychiatric condition;

  • The candidate reports a current substance use disorder that causes disability or family conflict.

  • The primary caregiver is unable to identify and recruit a care partner willing to commit to the study requirements;

  • The care recipient does not meet the criteria for dementia.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 UNC Program on Integrative Medicine Chapel Hill North Carolina United States 27599-7200

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan Gaylord, PhD, UNC-Chapel Hill
  • Principal Investigator: Sharon Williams, PhD, UNC Chapel Hill

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04058886
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 19-0053
  • R21AG061728
First Posted:
Aug 16, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Feb 8, 2022
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 8, 2022