EYE-EMPATH: Assessment of Empathetic Process by Scanpath Study of an Artwork

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04665622
Collaborator
Association de Recherche Bibliographique pour les Neurosciences (Other)
70
1
4
45
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Analysis of gaze patterns during social cognition tasks and standardised exploration of a specific artwork, between elderly subjects without cognitive disorders and subjects with neurodegenerative diseases such as Fronto-Temporal Dementia, Alzheimer's Dementia or Parkinson's Disease

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological evaluations
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
70 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A monocentric prospective, descriptive, comparative study.A monocentric prospective, descriptive, comparative study.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Theory of Mind, Empathy and Eye Gaze Strategies During an Artwork Observation in Neurodegenerative Pathologies.
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Fronto-temporal Dementia

10 subjects

Other: Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological evaluations
Use of Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological évaluations in 4 groups

Other: Alzheimer's Dementia

20 subjects

Other: Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological evaluations
Use of Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological évaluations in 4 groups

Other: Parkinson's Disease

20 subjects

Other: Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological evaluations
Use of Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological évaluations in 4 groups

Other: Healthy volunteers

20 subjects

Other: Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological evaluations
Use of Eye-Tracking / Neuropsychological évaluations in 4 groups

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. 1. Gaze patterns [baseline]

    Comparison of gaze patterns between the control group and the pathological groups, during standardized exploration of a specific artwork. Evaluation criteria: difference in the number of fixation

  2. 2.Gaze Patterns [Baseline]

    Comparison of gaze patterns between the control group and the pathological groups, during standardized exploration of a specific artwork. Evaluation criteria: difference in exploration strategy (chronology) on target areas.

  3. 3.Gaze Patterns [Baseline]

    Comparison of gaze patterns between the control group and the pathological groups, during standardized exploration of a specific artwork. Evaluation criteria: difference in time spent on target areas.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Cognitive Theory of mind during an artwork observation: Score 1 [Baseline]

    Subject's estimation of the distance perceived by the character represented on the artwork, at a 1st and a 2nd observation of the painting. Score 1 is the ratio of estimated distances (distance2/distance1).

  2. Cognitive Theory of mind during an artwork observation: Score 2 [Baseline]

    Subject's estimation of the time perceived by the character represented on the artwork, at a 1st and a 2nd observation of the painting. Score 2 is the ratio of estimated times (time2 / time1).

  3. Cognitive Theory of mind: TOM-15 a false-belief task to assess cognitive theory of mind [Baseline]

    The task presents 15 stories. The subject must answer the question asked by choosing among two propositions, the correct answer consisting in attributing the correct belief to the character represented. Total score (/ 15). ToM 15 is used as reference test for correlation study with score1 and score 2.

  4. Affective ToM (Score 3) [Baseline]

    At observation, 1 and 2, subject must attribute an emotion to the character represented on the artwork, choosing an answer among 6 propositions: 3 negative mental states, 2 neutral and 1 positive. Score 3 rating : 2 points if a negative emotion is attributed to the 1st and 2nd observation; 1 point if the negative emotion is attributed only to the 2nd observation; 0.5 point if the negative emotion is attributed only to the 1st observation; 0 point if no negative emotion is attributed.

  5. Affective ToM : The Reading the Mind in the Eye test - RME - (Baron-Cohen S at al., 2001) [Baseline]

    The task consisted of 36 black-and-white photographs of the eye area of faces. Subject is asked to choose which word, among four options, best described what the character in the photograph was thinking or feeling. Total score (/36) and three emotional valence sub-scores: positive (/8), neutral (/16) and negative (/12) according to the procedure described by Harkness et al., 2005. RME is used as reference test for correlation study with Score 3.

  6. Affective empathy: Score 4. [Baseline]

    Intensity of the emotion felt by the participant following observation of the table, using an EVA scale [0-10].

  7. Affective empathy: The Empathy Quotient (EQ). [Baseline]

    Self-administered questionnaire of 40 questions. Participant must choose one of the four propositions ("strongly agree", "tend to agree", "tend to disagree", "strongly disagree") awarding 0, 1 or 2 points. Total Score / 60. EQ is used as reference test for correlation study with Score 4.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
60 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male or Female.

  • 60 years old and above.

  • Sufficient written and oral expression in French.

  • Benefit from French or Monaco Social security.

  • Written informed consent signed by the patient.

  • For the control group: voluntary subjects, without cognitive impairment.

  • For the FTD / AD / PD groups: patients diagnosed with one of these diseases, and volunteers to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • General anaesthesia within 3 months.

  • Ophthalmological problems preventing a video-oculography examination.

  • Oculomotor disorders such as "fixation disorders" or "ocular tracking disorders".

  • History of stroke.

  • Cognitive disorders of the type: visual agnosia, visuo-spatial disorder, visuo-perceptual disorder or aphasia.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace Monaco Monaco 98000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace
  • Association de Recherche Bibliographique pour les Neurosciences

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04665622
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • EYE-EMPATH
First Posted:
Dec 11, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Mar 9, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 9, 2022