Observational Study of Cognitive Outcomes for Subjects Who Have Had Prior PET Amyloid Imaging With Florbetapir F 18 (18F-AV-45)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this protocol is to determine if brain amyloid imaged with florbetapir F 18 (18F-AV-45) PET scans is predictive of progressive cognitive impairment during the subsequent 36 months for groups of: normal controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
Hypothesis 1: The probability a subject will experience progressive cognitive impairment within 36 months of imaging will be greater in subjects whose 18F-AV-45 PET scan was rated amyloid positive compared to subjects whose PET scan was rated amyloid negative.
The secondary objective is to determine the stability, over 36 months of a clinical diagnosis, of AD in patients with an amyloid positive 18F-AV-45 PET.
Hypothesis 2: The diagnosis of AD will remain unchanged in patients whose PET scan were rated as amyloid positive.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Study AV-45-A11 is designed to determine if brain amyloid aggregation imaged on 18F-AV-45 PET scans is predictive of progression of cognitive impairment during the subsequent 36 months. Approximately 180 subjects enrolled in a prior clinical study (AV-45-A05[NCT00702143]) will be offered an opportunity to be studied under this protocol. The initial visit will occur as soon as possible following the AV-45-A05(NCT00702143) imaging day. Subjects who qualify for the study and their caregiver/partners will be contacted approximately 6,12,18,24 and 36 months after PET imaging in study AV-45-A05(NCT00702143), and will undergo a standardized functional and psychometric evaluation.
NOTE: This study is a clinical follow-up of subjects previously enrolled in trial 18F-AV-45-A05(NCT00702143). No new patients are being enrolled in this trial.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in ADAS-Cog for MCI Subjects [Baseline and 36 months]
The primary analysis was the comparison in the magnitude of change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) between Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) population at 36 months adjusting for baseline test score and age at informed consent. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (last observation carried forward [LOCF]). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Cognitive Decline in MCI Subjects [Baseline and 36 months]
The key secondary analyses compared the number of Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the MCI population with clinically significant deterioration in ADAS-Cog (≥4) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score (≥0.5) and conversion in diagnosis from MCI at baseline to AD or Cognitively Normal (CN) at 36 months. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. CDR scores (range 0-3) quantify the severity of the symptoms of dementia where 0 indicates no cognitive impairment and 3 indicates severe dementia. Changes in ADAS-Cog and CDR scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF).
- Change in ADAS-Cog in CN and AD Subjects [Baseline and 36 months]
This analysis compared the magnitude of change from baseline in ADAS cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores between Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the CN and AD populations at 36 months adjusting for baseline test score and age at informed consent. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance.
- Cognitive Decline in CN and AD Subjects [Baseline and 36 months]
The key secondary analyses compared the number of Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the CN and AD populations with clinically significant deterioration in ADAS-Cog (≥4) and CDR global score (≥0.5). ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. CDR scores (range 0-3) quantify the severity of the symptoms of dementia where 0 indicates no cognitive impairment and 3 indicates severe dementia. Changes in ADAS-Cog and CDR scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF).
- Covariate Adjusted Psychometric Score Change [Baseline and 36 months]
Change from baseline by diagnostic group in covariate-adjusted psychometric assessment scores at month 36 (LOCF). Assessments included Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS), Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Wechsler Logical Memory Scale (WLMS) delayed and immediate recall, Category Verbal Fluency (CVF) animals and vegetables, Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Studies Consortium Activities of Daily Living (ADCS ADL) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The ranges for these scales are as follows: DSS (0-93), CDR-SOB (0-18), MMSE (0-30), WLMS delayed and immediate recall (0-25), CVF animals and vegetables (0-total number of relevant items named in 60 seconds), ADCS ADL (0-78) and GDS (0-15). For all scales except CDR-SOB and GDS a higher score indicates greater cognitive function. For CDR-SOB and GDS a higher score indicates increased dementia or depression, respectively.
- Correlation of Change in ADAS-Cog and SUVR [Baseline and 36 months]
Correlation between change from baseline to 36 month ADAS-Cog score and baseline global average SUVR by diagnostic group is provided below. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance. Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) is the ratio of tracer uptake in the cortex and cerebellum. SUVR values higher than 1 indicate greater amyloid burden in the cortex as compared to the cerebellum whereas scores less than 1 indicate the opposite.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All subjects who enrolled in study AV-45-A05(NCT00702143), received 18F-AV-45, and completed a PET scan will be eligible to enroll in this trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Research Site | Scottsdale | Arizona | United States | 85258 |
2 | Research Site | Tucson | Arizona | United States | 85741 |
3 | Research Site | Costa Mesa | California | United States | 92626 |
4 | Research Site | Brooksville | Florida | United States | 34613 |
5 | Research Site | Hallandale Beach | Florida | United States | 33009 |
6 | Research Site | West Palm Beach | Florida | United States | 33407 |
7 | Research Site | Albany | New York | United States | 12208 |
8 | Research Site | Durham | North Carolina | United States | 27710 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Investigators
- Study Director: Chief Medical Officer, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 18F-AV-45-A11
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | All subjects were recruited from participants in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143) |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Alzheimer's Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitively Normal |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subject's with Alzheimer's Disease were recruited from study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143). None of these subjects received additional interventions in study 18F-AV-45-A11. | Subject's with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) were recruited from study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143). 36 of these subjects received a single dose of florbetapir F 18 370 MBq (10 mCi), IV injection at the 24 month time point of study 18F-AV-45-A11 and comprise the safety set discussed in the Adverse Events section. | Cognitively Normal (CN) subjects were recruited from study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143). 50 of these subjects received a single dose of florbetapir F 18 370 MBq (10 mCi), IV injection at the 24 month time point of study 18F-AV-45-A11 and comprise the safety set discussed in the Adverse Events section. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 31 | 52 | 69 |
COMPLETED | 16 | 37 | 51 |
NOT COMPLETED | 15 | 15 | 18 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Alzheimer's Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitively Normal | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Total of all reporting groups | |||
Overall Participants | 31 | 52 | 69 | 152 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
76.7
(9.23)
|
71.5
(10.09)
|
69.8
(11.26)
|
71.8
(10.73)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
13
41.9%
|
29
55.8%
|
41
59.4%
|
83
54.6%
|
Male |
18
58.1%
|
23
44.2%
|
28
40.6%
|
69
45.4%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||
United States |
31
100%
|
52
100%
|
69
100%
|
152
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in ADAS-Cog for MCI Subjects |
---|---|
Description | The primary analysis was the comparison in the magnitude of change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) between Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) population at 36 months adjusting for baseline test score and age at informed consent. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (last observation carried forward [LOCF]). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 36 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143). |
Arm/Group Title | Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | MCI subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | MCI subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. |
Measure Participants | 17 | 30 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Scores on a scale] |
5.664
(1.4667)
|
-0.710
(1.0905)
|
Title | Cognitive Decline in MCI Subjects |
---|---|
Description | The key secondary analyses compared the number of Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the MCI population with clinically significant deterioration in ADAS-Cog (≥4) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score (≥0.5) and conversion in diagnosis from MCI at baseline to AD or Cognitively Normal (CN) at 36 months. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. CDR scores (range 0-3) quantify the severity of the symptoms of dementia where 0 indicates no cognitive impairment and 3 indicates severe dementia. Changes in ADAS-Cog and CDR scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 36 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143). |
Arm/Group Title | Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | MCI subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | MCI subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. |
Measure Participants | 17 | 30 |
ADAS-Cog Deterioration ≥4 |
8
25.8%
|
3
5.8%
|
CDR Deterioration ≥0.5 |
5
16.1%
|
4
7.7%
|
Conversion to AD |
6
19.4%
|
3
5.8%
|
Conversion to CN |
1
3.2%
|
5
9.6%
|
Title | Change in ADAS-Cog in CN and AD Subjects |
---|---|
Description | This analysis compared the magnitude of change from baseline in ADAS cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores between Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the CN and AD populations at 36 months adjusting for baseline test score and age at informed consent. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 36 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143). |
Arm/Group Title | Amyloid-Beta Positive CN Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative CN Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Positive AD Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative AD Subjects |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | CN subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | CN subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | AD subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | AD subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 57 | 19 | 9 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Scores on a scale] |
3.237
(0.9043)
|
-0.094
(0.3679)
|
8.879
(2.8812)
|
3.811
(4.4261)
|
Title | Cognitive Decline in CN and AD Subjects |
---|---|
Description | The key secondary analyses compared the number of Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the CN and AD populations with clinically significant deterioration in ADAS-Cog (≥4) and CDR global score (≥0.5). ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. CDR scores (range 0-3) quantify the severity of the symptoms of dementia where 0 indicates no cognitive impairment and 3 indicates severe dementia. Changes in ADAS-Cog and CDR scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 36 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143). |
Arm/Group Title | Amyloid-Beta Positive CN Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative CN Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Positive AD Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative AD Subjects |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | CN subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | CN subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. 57 subjects were analyzed for change in ADAS-Cog and 55 subjects were analyzed for change in CDR. | AD subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | AD subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 57 | 19 | 9 |
ADAS-Cog Deterioration ≥4 |
4
12.9%
|
3
5.8%
|
14
20.3%
|
3
2%
|
CDR Deterioration ≥0.5 |
4
12.9%
|
5
9.6%
|
12
17.4%
|
2
1.3%
|
Title | Covariate Adjusted Psychometric Score Change |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline by diagnostic group in covariate-adjusted psychometric assessment scores at month 36 (LOCF). Assessments included Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS), Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Wechsler Logical Memory Scale (WLMS) delayed and immediate recall, Category Verbal Fluency (CVF) animals and vegetables, Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Studies Consortium Activities of Daily Living (ADCS ADL) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The ranges for these scales are as follows: DSS (0-93), CDR-SOB (0-18), MMSE (0-30), WLMS delayed and immediate recall (0-25), CVF animals and vegetables (0-total number of relevant items named in 60 seconds), ADCS ADL (0-78) and GDS (0-15). For all scales except CDR-SOB and GDS a higher score indicates greater cognitive function. For CDR-SOB and GDS a higher score indicates increased dementia or depression, respectively. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 36 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143). |
Arm/Group Title | Amyloid-Beta Positive CN Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative CN Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Positive AD Subjects | Amyloid-Beta Negative AD Subjects |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | CN subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | CN subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. All assessments were obtained for 57 subjects except for CDR-SOB and ADCS ADL which were obtained for 55 and 56 subjects respectively. | MCI subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | MCI subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | AD subjects with a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. | AD subjects with a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan at baseline. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 57 | 17 | 30 | 19 | 9 |
DSS |
-6.521
(2.9117)
|
0.214
(1.1709)
|
-10.940
(2.1569)
|
0.133
(1.6082)
|
-5.995
(2.2381)
|
-0.011
(3.3534)
|
CDR-SOB |
0.765
(0.1520)
|
0.097
(0.0632)
|
1.985
(0.5321)
|
0.392
(0.3976)
|
4.048
(0.8008)
|
0.121
(1.1739)
|
MMSE |
-0.740
(0.3282)
|
-0.396
(0.1329)
|
-2.882
(0.8053)
|
-0.300
(0.6023)
|
-3.924
(1.2418)
|
1.173
(1.8299)
|
WLMS delayed recall |
-0.429
(1.1278)
|
0.970
(0.4504)
|
-1.459
(1.1250)
|
0.493
(0.8386)
|
-0.179
(0.6722)
|
1.490
(1.10058)
|
WLMS immediate recall |
-0.926
(1.0560)
|
0.934
(0.4211)
|
-1.875
(0.9949)
|
0.496
(0.7405)
|
-0.891
(0.8151)
|
-0.231
(1.2620)
|
CVF animals |
-2.785
(1.5735)
|
-0.617
(0.6383)
|
-3.177
(1.0980)
|
-0.533
(0.8213)
|
-4.772
(0.8096)
|
0.085
(1.2654)
|
CVF vegetables |
-2.087
(1.0202)
|
0.156
(0.4150)
|
-2.278
(0.8162)
|
0.757
(0.6109)
|
-3.051
(0.7022)
|
0.621
(1.0959)
|
ADCS ADL |
-0.629
(0.7272)
|
-0.191
(0.2796)
|
-4.932
(2.2040)
|
-2.839
(1.6288)
|
-20.789
(4.5189)
|
-5.668
(6.6271)
|
GDS |
-0.164
(0.4780)
|
-0.182
(0.1926)
|
0.066
(0.4753)
|
-0.171
(0.3546)
|
0.530
(0.5679)
|
-0.727
(0.8264)
|
Title | Correlation of Change in ADAS-Cog and SUVR |
---|---|
Description | Correlation between change from baseline to 36 month ADAS-Cog score and baseline global average SUVR by diagnostic group is provided below. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance. Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) is the ratio of tracer uptake in the cortex and cerebellum. SUVR values higher than 1 indicate greater amyloid burden in the cortex as compared to the cerebellum whereas scores less than 1 indicate the opposite. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 36 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Alzheimer's Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitively Normal |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects with a baseline clinical diagnosis of AD. | Subjects with a baseline clinical diagnosis of MCI. | Subjects with a baseline clinical diagnosis of CN. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 47 | 67 |
Number [Pearson Correlation Coefficient] |
0.364
|
0.502
|
0.308
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The number of subjects at risk was determined by the number of subjects who received an injection of florbetapir F 18 at the 24 month time point of study 18F-AV-45-A11. As indicated in the participant flow group description, there were 36 MCI and 50 CN subjects who qualified for inclusion in the safety set. | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Alzheimer's Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitively Normal | |||
Arm/Group Description | ||||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Alzheimer's Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitively Normal | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Alzheimer's Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitively Normal | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 1/36 (2.8%) | 0/50 (0%) | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Influenza | 0/0 (NaN) | 0 | 1/36 (2.8%) | 1 | 0/50 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Alzheimer's Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitively Normal | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 1/36 (2.8%) | 1/50 (2%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Nausea | 0/0 (NaN) | 0 | 1/36 (2.8%) | 1 | 0/50 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Headache | 0/0 (NaN) | 0 | 0/36 (0%) | 0 | 1/50 (2%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Chief Medical Officer |
---|---|
Organization | Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. |
Phone | 215-298-0700 |
clinicaloperations@avidrp.com |
- 18F-AV-45-A11