MADCO-PC: Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Cognitive Outcomes After Perioperative Care
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will examine the hypothesis that changes in the cognition (i.e. thinking and memory) after anesthesia and surgery are correlated with changes in markers of Alzheimers Disease in the fluid around the brain and spinal cord (i.e. cerebrospinal fluid, or CSF), and/or changes in brain connectivity. The investigators will also examine whether different types of anesthesia have different effects on these CSF markers of Alzheimers disease, or different effects on thinking and memory after anesthesia and surgery, or differential effects on the correlation between cognitive changes and CSF marker changes.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol Patients in this arm will receive general anesthesia with propofol as the primary amnestic agent. |
Drug: Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol
|
Active Comparator: General anesthesia with Isoflurane Patients in this arm will undergo general anesthesia with isoflurane as the primary amnestic agent. |
Drug: General anesthesia with isoflurane
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Correlation Between Perioperative Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Perioperative Cognitive Change [Baseline to 6 weeks]
Spearman correlation was used here as the CSF markers follow a skewed distribution. Spearman correlation describes the strength of the monotonic relationship between two measures and is bounded between -1 and 1. Negative values indicate an inverse relationship while positive values mean that the variables move in tandem.
- Correlation Between Perioperative Change in Ratios of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Perioperative Cognitive Change [Baseline to 6 weeks]
Spearman correlation was used here as the ratio of CSF markers follow a skewed distribution. Spearman correlation describes the strength of the monotonic relationship between two measures and is bounded between -1 and 1. Negative values indicate an inverse relationship while positive values mean that the variables move in tandem.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Continuous Cognitive Index Score Change Difference Between Anesthetic Agent Groups [Baseline to 6 weeks]
To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 10 cognitive test scores from baseline. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week cognitive index. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with a standard deviation of 0.31 in the full surgical cohort.
- Change in CSF Markers of Alzheimers Disease by Anesthetic Agent Group [Baseline to 6 weeks]
CSF Markers of Alzheimer's Disease over time in the subjects treated with propofol versus those treated with isoflurane.
- Change in Ratio of CSF Markers of Alzheimers Disease by Anesthetic Agent Group [baseline to 6-weeks]
Change in ratio of CSF Markers of Alzheimer's Disease over time in the subjects treated with propofol versus those treated with isoflurane.
- Perioperative CSF Tau/Abeta Ratio Change [Baseline to 24 hours]
The perioperative change in the CSF tau/Abeta ratio from the start of anesthesia/surgery to 24 hours later.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Surgical patients 60 years of age or older
-
Surgery scheduled to last at least 2 hours (including time for anesthesia induction, etc)
-
English speaking ability.
-
Ability to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Inmate of a correctional facility (i.e. prisoners).
-
Pregnancy
-
Documented or suspected family or personal history of malignant hyperthermia.
-
Patient unable to receive either propofol or isoflurane due to allergy or other specific contraindication.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | United States | 27710 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Duke University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Miles Berger, MD, PhD, Duke University Medical Center, Anesthesiology Department, Neuroanesthesia Division
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- Pro00045180
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | General Anesthesia With Isoflurane | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | Non-Surgical Controls |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Surgical patients randomized to receive inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane during surgery | Surgical patients randomized to receive intravenous anesthesia with propofol during surgery | Cohort of community dwelling healthy controls for tertiary comparison |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 72 | 68 | 51 |
COMPLETED | 55 | 55 | 46 |
NOT COMPLETED | 17 | 13 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | General Anesthesia With Isoflurane | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | Non-Surgical Controls | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Surgical patients randomized to receive inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane during surgery | Surgical patients randomized to receive iintravenous anesthesia with propofol during surgery | Cohort of community dwelling healthy controls for tertiary comparison | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 55 | 55 | 46 | 156 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
68.6
(6.1)
|
69.7
(6.9)
|
69.6
(7.6)
|
69.3
(6.8)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
17
30.9%
|
24
43.6%
|
18
39.1%
|
59
37.8%
|
Male |
38
69.1%
|
31
56.4%
|
28
60.9%
|
97
62.2%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | ||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.2%
|
1
0.6%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
2
3.6%
|
8
14.5%
|
9
19.6%
|
19
12.2%
|
White |
52
94.5%
|
47
85.5%
|
36
78.3%
|
135
86.5%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1
1.8%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.6%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||
United States |
55
100%
|
55
100%
|
46
100%
|
156
100%
|
Baseline CSF levels (pg/ml) [Median (Full Range) ] | ||||
Tau |
47
|
50
|
58.5
|
49
|
Abeta |
369
|
352
|
330.5
|
347
|
P-Tau |
26
|
28
|
21.0
|
25
|
Baseline CSF ratio levels (ratio) [Median (Full Range) ] | ||||
Tau/Abeta Ratio |
0.13
|
0.14
|
0.16
|
0.14
|
P-Tau/Abeta Ratio |
0.08
|
0.08
|
0.06
|
0.07
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Correlation Between Perioperative Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Perioperative Cognitive Change |
---|---|
Description | Spearman correlation was used here as the CSF markers follow a skewed distribution. Spearman correlation describes the strength of the monotonic relationship between two measures and is bounded between -1 and 1. Negative values indicate an inverse relationship while positive values mean that the variables move in tandem. |
Time Frame | Baseline to 6 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The combination of both surgical randomized treatment groups. |
Measure Participants | 110 |
Tau |
-1.21
|
Abeta |
-5.09
|
P-Tau |
-0.44
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|---|
Comments | Correlation between 6-week change in Tau and continuous cognitive index | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Spearman Correlation |
Estimated Value | -0.03 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.23 to 0.18 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|---|
Comments | Correlation between 6-week change in Abeta and continuous cognitive index | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Spearman Correlation |
Estimated Value | -0.08 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.29 to 0.13 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|---|
Comments | Correlation between 6-week change in P-Tau and continuous cognitive index | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Spearman Correlation |
Estimated Value | 0.12 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.08 to 0.32 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Correlation Between Perioperative Change in Ratios of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Perioperative Cognitive Change |
---|---|
Description | Spearman correlation was used here as the ratio of CSF markers follow a skewed distribution. Spearman correlation describes the strength of the monotonic relationship between two measures and is bounded between -1 and 1. Negative values indicate an inverse relationship while positive values mean that the variables move in tandem. |
Time Frame | Baseline to 6 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The combination of both surgical randomized treatment groups. |
Measure Participants | 110 |
Tau/Abeta Ratio |
0.001
|
P-Tau/Abeta Ratio |
0.002
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|---|
Comments | Correlation between 6-week change in Tau/Abeta ratio and continuous cognitive index | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Spearman Correlation |
Estimated Value | 0.02 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.19 to 0.22 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|---|
Comments | Correlation between 6-week change in P-Tau/Abeta ratio and continuous cognitive index | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Spearman Correlation |
Estimated Value | 0.16 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.05 to 0.34 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Continuous Cognitive Index Score Change Difference Between Anesthetic Agent Groups |
---|---|
Description | To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 10 cognitive test scores from baseline. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week cognitive index. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with a standard deviation of 0.31 in the full surgical cohort. |
Time Frame | Baseline to 6 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in this arm will receive general anesthesia with propofol as the primary amnestic agent. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol | Patients in this arm will undergo general anesthesia with isoflurane as the primary amnestic agent. General anesthesia with isoflurane |
Measure Participants | 55 | 55 |
Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale] |
0.019
(0.05)
|
0.061
(0.04)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.360 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Change in CSF Markers of Alzheimers Disease by Anesthetic Agent Group |
---|---|
Description | CSF Markers of Alzheimer's Disease over time in the subjects treated with propofol versus those treated with isoflurane. |
Time Frame | Baseline to 6 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in this arm will receive general anesthesia with propofol as the primary amnestic agent. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol | Patients in this arm will undergo general anesthesia with isoflurane as the primary amnestic agent. General anesthesia with isoflurane |
Measure Participants | 55 | 55 |
Tau |
-0.80
|
-1.67
|
Abeta |
-2.10
|
-9.50
|
P-Tau |
-2.25
|
1.10
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in 6-week Tau Change between anesthetic groups | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.532 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in 6-week Abeta Change between anesthetic groups | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.565 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in 6-week P-Tau Change between anesthetic groups | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.110 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Ratio of CSF Markers of Alzheimers Disease by Anesthetic Agent Group |
---|---|
Description | Change in ratio of CSF Markers of Alzheimer's Disease over time in the subjects treated with propofol versus those treated with isoflurane. |
Time Frame | baseline to 6-weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in this arm will receive general anesthesia with propofol as the primary amnestic agent. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol | Patients in this arm will undergo general anesthesia with isoflurane as the primary amnestic agent. General anesthesia with isoflurane |
Measure Participants | 55 | 55 |
Tau/Abeta Ratio |
0.00
|
-0.00
|
P-Tau/Abeta Ratio |
-0.00
|
0.01
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in 6-week Tau/Abeta ratio Change between anesthetic groups | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.439 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in 6-week P-Tau/Abeta Change between anesthetic groups | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.082 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Perioperative CSF Tau/Abeta Ratio Change |
---|---|
Description | The perioperative change in the CSF tau/Abeta ratio from the start of anesthesia/surgery to 24 hours later. |
Time Frame | Baseline to 24 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The combination of both surgical randomized treatment groups. |
Measure Participants | 110 |
Median (Full Range) [ratio] |
-0.001
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Combined Surgical Cohort |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.801 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon Signed Rank | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 6 weeks | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||
Arm/Group Title | General Anesthesia With Isoflurane | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | Non-Surgical Controls | |||
Arm/Group Description | Surgical patients randomized to receive inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane during surgery | Surgical patients randomized to receive iintravenous anesthesia with propofol during surgery | Cohort of community dwelling healthy controls for comparison | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
General Anesthesia With Isoflurane | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | Non-Surgical Controls | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/72 (0%) | 2/68 (2.9%) | 0/51 (0%) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
General Anesthesia With Isoflurane | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | Non-Surgical Controls | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/72 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/51 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
General Anesthesia With Isoflurane | Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol | Non-Surgical Controls | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/72 (2.8%) | 8/68 (11.8%) | 7/51 (13.7%) | |||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||
Elevated PTT | 0/72 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/51 (0%) | 0 |
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Vagal Event | 1/72 (1.4%) | 1 | 3/68 (4.4%) | 3 | 2/51 (3.9%) | 2 |
General disorders | ||||||
Fever | 0/72 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/51 (0%) | 0 |
Leg Pain and Swelling | 1/72 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 | 0/51 (0%) | 0 |
Back Pain | 0/72 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 | 3/51 (5.9%) | 5 |
Neck Stiffness | 0/72 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/51 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Headache | 0/72 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/51 (0%) | 0 |
Post-dural puncture headache | 0/72 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 | 2/51 (3.9%) | 2 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Shortness of Breath | 0/72 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/51 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Miles Berger, MD, PhD |
---|---|
Organization | Duke University |
Phone | 919-684-8679 |
miles.berger@duke.edu |
- Pro00045180