MADCO-PC: Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Cognitive Outcomes After Perioperative Care

Sponsor
Duke University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01993836
Collaborator
(none)
191
1
2
62.3
3.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study will examine the hypothesis that changes in the cognition (i.e. thinking and memory) after anesthesia and surgery are correlated with changes in markers of Alzheimers Disease in the fluid around the brain and spinal cord (i.e. cerebrospinal fluid, or CSF), and/or changes in brain connectivity. The investigators will also examine whether different types of anesthesia have different effects on these CSF markers of Alzheimers disease, or different effects on thinking and memory after anesthesia and surgery, or differential effects on the correlation between cognitive changes and CSF marker changes.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol
  • Drug: General anesthesia with isoflurane
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
191 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Cognitive Outcomes After Perioperative Care
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 10, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 10, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol

Patients in this arm will receive general anesthesia with propofol as the primary amnestic agent.

Drug: Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol

Active Comparator: General anesthesia with Isoflurane

Patients in this arm will undergo general anesthesia with isoflurane as the primary amnestic agent.

Drug: General anesthesia with isoflurane

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Correlation Between Perioperative Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Perioperative Cognitive Change [Baseline to 6 weeks]

    Spearman correlation was used here as the CSF markers follow a skewed distribution. Spearman correlation describes the strength of the monotonic relationship between two measures and is bounded between -1 and 1. Negative values indicate an inverse relationship while positive values mean that the variables move in tandem.

  2. Correlation Between Perioperative Change in Ratios of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Perioperative Cognitive Change [Baseline to 6 weeks]

    Spearman correlation was used here as the ratio of CSF markers follow a skewed distribution. Spearman correlation describes the strength of the monotonic relationship between two measures and is bounded between -1 and 1. Negative values indicate an inverse relationship while positive values mean that the variables move in tandem.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Continuous Cognitive Index Score Change Difference Between Anesthetic Agent Groups [Baseline to 6 weeks]

    To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 10 cognitive test scores from baseline. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week cognitive index. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with a standard deviation of 0.31 in the full surgical cohort.

  2. Change in CSF Markers of Alzheimers Disease by Anesthetic Agent Group [Baseline to 6 weeks]

    CSF Markers of Alzheimer's Disease over time in the subjects treated with propofol versus those treated with isoflurane.

  3. Change in Ratio of CSF Markers of Alzheimers Disease by Anesthetic Agent Group [baseline to 6-weeks]

    Change in ratio of CSF Markers of Alzheimer's Disease over time in the subjects treated with propofol versus those treated with isoflurane.

  4. Perioperative CSF Tau/Abeta Ratio Change [Baseline to 24 hours]

    The perioperative change in the CSF tau/Abeta ratio from the start of anesthesia/surgery to 24 hours later.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
60 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Surgical patients 60 years of age or older

  • Surgery scheduled to last at least 2 hours (including time for anesthesia induction, etc)

  • English speaking ability.

  • Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Inmate of a correctional facility (i.e. prisoners).

  • Pregnancy

  • Documented or suspected family or personal history of malignant hyperthermia.

  • Patient unable to receive either propofol or isoflurane due to allergy or other specific contraindication.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina United States 27710

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Duke University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Miles Berger, MD, PhD, Duke University Medical Center, Anesthesiology Department, Neuroanesthesia Division

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01993836
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Pro00045180
First Posted:
Nov 25, 2013
Last Update Posted:
May 5, 2020
Last Verified:
May 1, 2020

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title General Anesthesia With Isoflurane Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol Non-Surgical Controls
Arm/Group Description Surgical patients randomized to receive inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane during surgery Surgical patients randomized to receive intravenous anesthesia with propofol during surgery Cohort of community dwelling healthy controls for tertiary comparison
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 72 68 51
COMPLETED 55 55 46
NOT COMPLETED 17 13 5

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title General Anesthesia With Isoflurane Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol Non-Surgical Controls Total
Arm/Group Description Surgical patients randomized to receive inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane during surgery Surgical patients randomized to receive iintravenous anesthesia with propofol during surgery Cohort of community dwelling healthy controls for tertiary comparison Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 55 55 46 156
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
68.6
(6.1)
69.7
(6.9)
69.6
(7.6)
69.3
(6.8)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
17
30.9%
24
43.6%
18
39.1%
59
37.8%
Male
38
69.1%
31
56.4%
28
60.9%
97
62.2%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Asian
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.2%
1
0.6%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Black or African American
2
3.6%
8
14.5%
9
19.6%
19
12.2%
White
52
94.5%
47
85.5%
36
78.3%
135
86.5%
More than one race
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Unknown or Not Reported
1
1.8%
0
0%
0
0%
1
0.6%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
55
100%
55
100%
46
100%
156
100%
Baseline CSF levels (pg/ml) [Median (Full Range) ]
Tau
47
50
58.5
49
Abeta
369
352
330.5
347
P-Tau
26
28
21.0
25
Baseline CSF ratio levels (ratio) [Median (Full Range) ]
Tau/Abeta Ratio
0.13
0.14
0.16
0.14
P-Tau/Abeta Ratio
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.07

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Correlation Between Perioperative Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Perioperative Cognitive Change
Description Spearman correlation was used here as the CSF markers follow a skewed distribution. Spearman correlation describes the strength of the monotonic relationship between two measures and is bounded between -1 and 1. Negative values indicate an inverse relationship while positive values mean that the variables move in tandem.
Time Frame Baseline to 6 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit.
Arm/Group Title Combined Surgical Cohort
Arm/Group Description The combination of both surgical randomized treatment groups.
Measure Participants 110
Tau
-1.21
Abeta
-5.09
P-Tau
-0.44
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort
Comments Correlation between 6-week change in Tau and continuous cognitive index
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Spearman Correlation
Estimated Value -0.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.23 to 0.18
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort
Comments Correlation between 6-week change in Abeta and continuous cognitive index
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Spearman Correlation
Estimated Value -0.08
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.29 to 0.13
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort
Comments Correlation between 6-week change in P-Tau and continuous cognitive index
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Spearman Correlation
Estimated Value 0.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.08 to 0.32
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Primary Outcome
Title Correlation Between Perioperative Change in Ratios of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Markers of Alzheimers Disease and Perioperative Cognitive Change
Description Spearman correlation was used here as the ratio of CSF markers follow a skewed distribution. Spearman correlation describes the strength of the monotonic relationship between two measures and is bounded between -1 and 1. Negative values indicate an inverse relationship while positive values mean that the variables move in tandem.
Time Frame Baseline to 6 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit.
Arm/Group Title Combined Surgical Cohort
Arm/Group Description The combination of both surgical randomized treatment groups.
Measure Participants 110
Tau/Abeta Ratio
0.001
P-Tau/Abeta Ratio
0.002
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort
Comments Correlation between 6-week change in Tau/Abeta ratio and continuous cognitive index
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Spearman Correlation
Estimated Value 0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.19 to 0.22
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort
Comments Correlation between 6-week change in P-Tau/Abeta ratio and continuous cognitive index
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Spearman Correlation
Estimated Value 0.16
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.05 to 0.34
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Continuous Cognitive Index Score Change Difference Between Anesthetic Agent Groups
Description To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 10 cognitive test scores from baseline. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week cognitive index. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with a standard deviation of 0.31 in the full surgical cohort.
Time Frame Baseline to 6 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit.
Arm/Group Title Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Arm/Group Description Patients in this arm will receive general anesthesia with propofol as the primary amnestic agent. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol Patients in this arm will undergo general anesthesia with isoflurane as the primary amnestic agent. General anesthesia with isoflurane
Measure Participants 55 55
Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale]
0.019
(0.05)
0.061
(0.04)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.360
Comments
Method t-test, 2 sided
Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in CSF Markers of Alzheimers Disease by Anesthetic Agent Group
Description CSF Markers of Alzheimer's Disease over time in the subjects treated with propofol versus those treated with isoflurane.
Time Frame Baseline to 6 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit.
Arm/Group Title Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Arm/Group Description Patients in this arm will receive general anesthesia with propofol as the primary amnestic agent. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol Patients in this arm will undergo general anesthesia with isoflurane as the primary amnestic agent. General anesthesia with isoflurane
Measure Participants 55 55
Tau
-0.80
-1.67
Abeta
-2.10
-9.50
P-Tau
-2.25
1.10
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Comments Difference in 6-week Tau Change between anesthetic groups
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.532
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Comments Difference in 6-week Abeta Change between anesthetic groups
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.565
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Comments Difference in 6-week P-Tau Change between anesthetic groups
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.110
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Ratio of CSF Markers of Alzheimers Disease by Anesthetic Agent Group
Description Change in ratio of CSF Markers of Alzheimer's Disease over time in the subjects treated with propofol versus those treated with isoflurane.
Time Frame baseline to 6-weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit.
Arm/Group Title Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Arm/Group Description Patients in this arm will receive general anesthesia with propofol as the primary amnestic agent. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol Patients in this arm will undergo general anesthesia with isoflurane as the primary amnestic agent. General anesthesia with isoflurane
Measure Participants 55 55
Tau/Abeta Ratio
0.00
-0.00
P-Tau/Abeta Ratio
-0.00
0.01
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Comments Difference in 6-week Tau/Abeta ratio Change between anesthetic groups
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.439
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort, General Anesthesia With Isoflurane
Comments Difference in 6-week P-Tau/Abeta Change between anesthetic groups
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.082
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Perioperative CSF Tau/Abeta Ratio Change
Description The perioperative change in the CSF tau/Abeta ratio from the start of anesthesia/surgery to 24 hours later.
Time Frame Baseline to 24 hours

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis for the primary and secondary outcome 6 use the combination of both randomized treatment groups. The treatment groups are separated and compared in secondary analysis of outcomes 3-5, and the control group is only used in tertiary analyses. To be included in the outcome analysis patients must have returned for six-week follow-up visit.
Arm/Group Title Combined Surgical Cohort
Arm/Group Description The combination of both surgical randomized treatment groups.
Measure Participants 110
Median (Full Range) [ratio]
-0.001
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined Surgical Cohort
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.801
Comments
Method Wilcoxon Signed Rank
Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame 6 weeks
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title General Anesthesia With Isoflurane Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol Non-Surgical Controls
Arm/Group Description Surgical patients randomized to receive inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane during surgery Surgical patients randomized to receive iintravenous anesthesia with propofol during surgery Cohort of community dwelling healthy controls for comparison
All Cause Mortality
General Anesthesia With Isoflurane Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol Non-Surgical Controls
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/72 (0%) 2/68 (2.9%) 0/51 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
General Anesthesia With Isoflurane Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol Non-Surgical Controls
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/72 (0%) 0/68 (0%) 0/51 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
General Anesthesia With Isoflurane Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol Non-Surgical Controls
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 2/72 (2.8%) 8/68 (11.8%) 7/51 (13.7%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Elevated PTT 0/72 (0%) 0 1/68 (1.5%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Cardiac disorders
Vagal Event 1/72 (1.4%) 1 3/68 (4.4%) 3 2/51 (3.9%) 2
General disorders
Fever 0/72 (0%) 0 1/68 (1.5%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Leg Pain and Swelling 1/72 (1.4%) 1 0/68 (0%) 0 0/51 (0%) 0
Back Pain 0/72 (0%) 0 1/68 (1.5%) 1 3/51 (5.9%) 5
Neck Stiffness 0/72 (0%) 0 1/68 (1.5%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Nervous system disorders
Headache 0/72 (0%) 0 1/68 (1.5%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Post-dural puncture headache 0/72 (0%) 0 1/68 (1.5%) 1 2/51 (3.9%) 2
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of Breath 0/72 (0%) 0 1/68 (1.5%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Miles Berger, MD, PhD
Organization Duke University
Phone 919-684-8679
Email miles.berger@duke.edu
Responsible Party:
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01993836
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Pro00045180
First Posted:
Nov 25, 2013
Last Update Posted:
May 5, 2020
Last Verified:
May 1, 2020