Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Small Bowel Pillcam SB2 and Capsocam Capsule
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Comparative, randomized study patients are scheduled to have two capsule endoscopies within 2 to 14 days from each other using two different endoscopies the Pillcam SB2 (Given Imaging, Israel) and the Capsocam (Capso Vision Saratoga United States) The order in which the devices are administered is randomly allocated.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Objectives
Main objective
To compare the diagnostic yield of both capsules in the same patients with a satisfying concordance coefficient k>0,6
Secondary objectives
To compare the sensitivity and specificity of both capsule readings To copmpare the sensitivity and specificity for specific lesions classified in terms of relevance P0 P1 P2 To check the tecnical fiability (incidence of technical issues To check the feasibility To evaluate the rate of complete small bowel examination, the small bowel transit time the capsule reading time
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: capsocam capsula capsocam capsula readings |
Device: capsule endoscopies
Patients inclusion following inclusion criterias Randomization of capsule ingestion order Videocapsule recording by the two capsules Reading of the two capsules films in randomized order by two different readers in each center Reviewing of discordant capsule films by an expert panel
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- number of discordant films between the two capsules with two different readers [14 days]
Reading of the two capsules film is randomized order by two different readers in each center
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
over 18 years old
-
obscure digestive bleeding justifying capsule endoscopy
-
complete endoscopic work up including colonoscopy with ileoscopy and gastroscopy with aneathesia or sedation
-
absence of concomittent ongoing study
-
absence of occlusive symptoms of suspected Crohn's disease nor of previous small bowel radiotherapy
-
filled inform consent
-
no implanted pace maker
-
patient being affiliated to the CPAM
Exclusion Criteria:
-
under 18 years old
-
oral iron within 8 days before capsule endoscopy
-
gastroparesis
-
pacemaker
-
swallowing troubles
-
presence of oclusive symptoms suspected Crohn's disease nor of previous small bowel radiotherapy
-
pregnancy or risk of pregnancy without efficient oral contraception
-
absence of written informed consent
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hôpital Edouard Herriot
- Capso Vision, Inc.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Saurin JS Jean Christophe, Msd,
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2010-023341-29