Effects of Erythropoietin on Cerebral Vascular Dysfunction and Anemia in Traumatic Brain Injury
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of early administration of recombinant human erythropoietin on long-term neurological outcome after severe traumatic brain injury.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes a spectrum of cerebrovascular dysfunction, ranging from impaired pressure autoregulation to severe global ischemia (inadequate blood flow). Pressure autoregulation is the ability of an organ to maintain a constant blood flow despite changes in perfusion pressure. Impaired pressure autoregulation causes TBI patients to be more vulnerable to secondary ischemic attacks.
Erythropoietin (Epo) is a substance that is normally made by the kidneys and stimulates the production of red blood cells. It is usually given to patients to treat anemia. Scientists recently discovered that Epo also is made in the brain after injury. In animal models of TBI, the brain's production of Epo has numerous protective effects, including reducing inflammation in the brain, reducing death of brain cells, and improving blood flow to the brain. In the laboratory, the effects of this naturally-occurring, protective agent can be enhanced by giving additional amounts intravenously. Because Epo may have beneficial effects for both the injured brain and anemia, scientists are studying the effects of giving Epo to patients with severe TBI.
The primary objective of this randomized, placebo-controlled study is to determine the effect of early administration of recombinant human Epo (rhEpo), on long-term neurological outcome in patients with severe TBI. The researchers also will examine the effects of rhEpo administration on the cerebrovascular system, hemoglobin concentration, brain oxygenation, the need for blood transfusion, and on systemic complications.
This study consists of 2 parts: 1) a treatment phase, and 2) a monitoring phase. In the treatment phase, participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: a low or high dose rhEPO treatment group or low or high dose placebo group (control group). All other aspects of treatment during the acute post-injury phase will follow the standard treatment protocol for individuals with severe TBI. Generally the treatment phase lasts 1-2 weeks or the amount of time that is required for patients to receive treatment of their TBIs in the ICU (intensive care unit). The monitoring part of the study (which includes recording information from tests performed as part of the standard TBI treatment, as well as some additional tests performed especially for the study) lasts for up to 6 months after the TBI.
Information learned in this study may lead to knowledge about whether rhEpo improves outcomes after TBI and about the optimal hemoglobin concentration to maintain in patients with TBI.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Epo1 and TT10 recombinant human erythropoietin, rhEpo administration (500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury) and hemoglobin transfusion trigger of 10gm/dl |
Drug: recombinant human erythropoietin, rhEpo
The study design is 2x2 factorial with randomization to erythropoietin or placebo and to transfusion trigger 10 gm/dl or 7 g/dl. Erythropoietin or placebo was initially dosed daily for 3 days and then weekly for 2 more weeks (first 74 patients, Epo1 dosing regimen), and then the 24- and 48-hour doses were stopped for the remainder of the patients (remaining 126 patients, Epo2 dosing regimen).
|
Active Comparator: Epo1 and TT7 recombinant human erythropoietin, rhEpo administration (500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury) and hemoglobin transfusion trigger 7gm/dl |
Drug: recombinant human erythropoietin, rhEpo
The study design is 2x2 factorial with randomization to erythropoietin or placebo and to transfusion trigger 10 gm/dl or 7 g/dl. Erythropoietin or placebo was initially dosed daily for 3 days and then weekly for 2 more weeks (first 74 patients, Epo1 dosing regimen), and then the 24- and 48-hour doses were stopped for the remainder of the patients (remaining 126 patients, Epo2 dosing regimen).
|
Active Comparator: Epo2 and TT10 recombinant human erythropoietin, rhEpo administration (500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury) and hemoglobin transfusion trigger 10gm/dl |
Drug: recombinant human erythropoietin, rhEpo
The study design is 2x2 factorial with randomization to erythropoietin or placebo and to transfusion trigger 10 gm/dl or 7 g/dl. Erythropoietin or placebo was initially dosed daily for 3 days and then weekly for 2 more weeks (first 74 patients, Epo1 dosing regimen), and then the 24- and 48-hour doses were stopped for the remainder of the patients (remaining 126 patients, Epo2 dosing regimen).
|
Active Comparator: Epo2 and TT7 recombinant human erythropoietin, rhEpo administration (500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury) and hemoglobin transfusion trigger 7gm/dl |
Drug: recombinant human erythropoietin, rhEpo
The study design is 2x2 factorial with randomization to erythropoietin or placebo and to transfusion trigger 10 gm/dl or 7 g/dl. Erythropoietin or placebo was initially dosed daily for 3 days and then weekly for 2 more weeks (first 74 patients, Epo1 dosing regimen), and then the 24- and 48-hour doses were stopped for the remainder of the patients (remaining 126 patients, Epo2 dosing regimen).
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo and TT10 Placebo administration and transfusion threshold 10 gm/dl |
Other: placebo
an inactive substance
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo and TT7 Placebo administration and transfusion threshold 7 gm/dl |
Other: placebo
an inactive substance
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Glasgow Outcome Scale [at 6 months after injury]
Dichotomized to favorable outcome (good recovery or moderate disability) or to unfavorable outcome (severe disability or vegetative or dead)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Disability Rating Scale [at 6 months]
Disability rating scale was a secondary outcome measure for the transfusion threshold analysis. Disability rating scale ranges from 0 to 30, with 30 indicating death and 0 indicating return to normal status.
- Mortality Rate [up to 6 months after injury]
mortality rate was a secondary outcome measure for the Epo randomization, and a primary safety outcome measure for the transfusion threshold randomization
- Incidence of Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) [within 30 days after injury]
development of ARDS was a primary safety outcome for the transfusion threshold randomization
- Incidence of Infection [within 30 days after injury]
occurrence of infection was a primary safety outcome for the transfusion threshold randomization
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Blunt trauma mechanism of brain injury
-
Glasgow Coma Score - motor component ≤ 5 (not following commands) on the post-resuscitation neurologic exam
-
Available for enrollment and administration of study drug within 6 hours of injury
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Penetrating trauma (i.e. gun shot wounds)
-
Glasgow Coma Score = 3 and bilateral fixed and dilated pupils
-
Abbreviated Injury Scale score > 5 for any body part except brain
-
Severe pre-existing chronic disease
-
Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as mean arterial pressure > 130mmHg despite antihypertensive treatment
-
Known hypersensitivity to mammalian cell-derived products or human albumin
-
Currently taking anticoagulants
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Baylor College of Medicine, Ben Taub General Hospital | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Claudia Sue Robertson
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claudia Robertson, MD, Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- P01NS038660
- P01NS038660
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Epo1/TT7 Arm | Epo2/TT7 Arm | Placebo/TT7 Arm | Epo1/TT10 Arm | Epo2/TT10 Arm | Placebo/TT10 Arm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | High dose Epo (patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury) and hemoglobin transfusion threshold 7 gm/dl | Low dose Epo (patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury) and hemoglobin transfusion threshold 7 gm/dl | Placebo (patients received saline) and hemoglobin transfusion threshold 7 gm/dl | High dose Epo (patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury) and hemoglobin transfusion threshold 10 gm/dl | Low dose Epo (patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury) and hemoglobin transfusion threshold 10 gm/dl | Placebo (patients received saline) and hemoglobin transfusion threshold 10 gm/dl |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||||
STARTED | 18 | 31 | 50 | 20 | 33 | 48 |
COMPLETED | 13 | 23 | 38 | 16 | 27 | 35 |
NOT COMPLETED | 5 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 13 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Epo1/TT7 Arm | Epo2/TT7 Arm | Placebo/TT7 Arm | Epo1/TT10 Arm | Epo2/TT10 Arm | Placebo/TT10 Arm | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury and transfused to keep hemoglobin at least 7 g/dl | Patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury and transfused to keep hemoglobin concentration at least 7 g/dl | Patients received saline and transfused to keep hemoglobin concentration at least 7 g/dl | Patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury and transfused to keep hemoglobin at least 10 g/dl | Patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury and transfused to keep hemoglobin concentration at least 10 g/dl | Patients received saline and transfused to keep hemoglobin concentration at least 10 g/dl | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 18 | 31 | 50 | 20 | 33 | 48 | 200 |
Age (years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||||||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [years] |
25.5
|
28
|
29.5
|
36.5
|
30
|
30.5
|
30
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||||||
Female |
2
11.1%
|
3
9.7%
|
9
18%
|
2
10%
|
5
15.2%
|
5
10.4%
|
26
13%
|
Male |
16
88.9%
|
28
90.3%
|
41
82%
|
18
90%
|
28
84.8%
|
43
89.6%
|
174
87%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |||||||
Asian |
1
5.6%
|
1
3.2%
|
1
2%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
3
6.3%
|
6
3%
|
Hispanic |
8
44.4%
|
16
51.6%
|
26
52%
|
12
60%
|
19
57.6%
|
22
45.8%
|
103
51.5%
|
Black |
4
22.2%
|
4
12.9%
|
12
24%
|
3
15%
|
6
18.2%
|
14
29.2%
|
43
21.5%
|
White, non-Hispanic |
5
27.8%
|
10
32.3%
|
11
22%
|
5
25%
|
8
24.2%
|
9
18.8%
|
48
24%
|
Prehospital hypotension (participants) [Number] | |||||||
yes |
1
5.6%
|
3
9.7%
|
7
14%
|
3
15%
|
2
6.1%
|
9
18.8%
|
25
12.5%
|
no |
17
94.4%
|
28
90.3%
|
43
86%
|
17
85%
|
31
93.9%
|
39
81.3%
|
175
87.5%
|
Prehospital hypoxia (participants) [Number] | |||||||
yes |
0
0%
|
2
6.5%
|
16
32%
|
3
15%
|
5
15.2%
|
13
27.1%
|
39
19.5%
|
no |
18
100%
|
29
93.5%
|
34
68%
|
17
85%
|
28
84.8%
|
35
72.9%
|
161
80.5%
|
Mechanism of injury (participants) [Number] | |||||||
Assault |
0
0%
|
2
6.5%
|
5
10%
|
2
10%
|
3
9.1%
|
10
20.8%
|
22
11%
|
Fall or jump |
8
44.4%
|
3
9.7%
|
7
14%
|
3
15%
|
4
12.1%
|
2
4.2%
|
27
13.5%
|
Automobile crash |
10
55.6%
|
19
61.3%
|
29
58%
|
9
45%
|
22
66.7%
|
27
56.3%
|
116
58%
|
Motorcycle crash |
0
0%
|
7
22.6%
|
7
14%
|
5
25%
|
4
12.1%
|
8
16.7%
|
31
15.5%
|
Other |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
4%
|
1
5%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.1%
|
4
2%
|
Injury Severity Score (units on a scale) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||||||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [units on a scale] |
29
|
30
|
29
|
27
|
29
|
29
|
29
|
IMPACT probability of poor outcome (probability of poor outcome) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [probability of poor outcome] |
.29
(.2)
|
.35
(.2)
|
.45
(.3)
|
.49
(.2)
|
.46
(.3)
|
.38
(.3)
|
.41
(.25)
|
Motor component of Glasgow Coma Score (participants) [Number] | |||||||
mGCS 1-3 |
4
22.2%
|
12
38.7%
|
20
40%
|
8
40%
|
14
42.4%
|
13
27.1%
|
71
35.5%
|
mGCS 4-5 |
14
77.8%
|
19
61.3%
|
30
60%
|
12
60%
|
19
57.6%
|
35
72.9%
|
129
64.5%
|
Sum Glasgow Coma Score (participants) [Number] | |||||||
GCS 3-5 |
4
22.2%
|
10
32.3%
|
20
40%
|
8
40%
|
13
39.4%
|
11
22.9%
|
66
33%
|
GCS 6-8 |
10
55.6%
|
13
41.9%
|
19
38%
|
8
40%
|
16
48.5%
|
23
47.9%
|
89
44.5%
|
GCS > 8 |
4
22.2%
|
8
25.8%
|
11
22%
|
4
20%
|
4
12.1%
|
14
29.2%
|
45
22.5%
|
Pupil reactivity (participants) [Number] | |||||||
Both reactive |
12
66.7%
|
24
77.4%
|
27
54%
|
13
65%
|
17
51.5%
|
28
58.3%
|
121
60.5%
|
One reactive |
2
11.1%
|
4
12.9%
|
8
16%
|
3
15%
|
1
3%
|
5
10.4%
|
23
11.5%
|
Neither reactive |
4
22.2%
|
3
9.7%
|
15
30%
|
4
20%
|
15
45.5%
|
15
31.3%
|
56
28%
|
Marshall CT scan category (participants) [Number] | |||||||
Diffuse injury 1 or 2 |
10
55.6%
|
15
48.4%
|
24
48%
|
5
25%
|
15
45.5%
|
20
41.7%
|
89
44.5%
|
Diffuse injury 3 or 4 |
5
27.8%
|
8
25.8%
|
10
20%
|
9
45%
|
2
6.1%
|
12
25%
|
46
23%
|
Mass lesion |
3
16.7%
|
8
25.8%
|
16
32%
|
6
30%
|
16
48.5%
|
16
33.3%
|
65
32.5%
|
Presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (participants) [Number] | |||||||
yes |
12
66.7%
|
22
71%
|
37
74%
|
3
15%
|
22
66.7%
|
11
22.9%
|
107
53.5%
|
no |
6
33.3%
|
9
29%
|
13
26%
|
17
85%
|
11
33.3%
|
37
77.1%
|
93
46.5%
|
Presence of epidural hematoma (participants) [Number] | |||||||
yes |
3
16.7%
|
4
12.9%
|
3
6%
|
3
15%
|
8
24.2%
|
11
22.9%
|
32
16%
|
no |
15
83.3%
|
27
87.1%
|
47
94%
|
17
85%
|
25
75.8%
|
37
77.1%
|
168
84%
|
Hemoglobin concentration (g/dl) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||||||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [g/dl] |
14.7
|
14.7
|
14.0
|
14.8
|
13.9
|
14.7
|
14.45
|
Glucose concentration (mmol/L) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||||||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mmol/L] |
8.3
|
9.1
|
8.9
|
8.8
|
8.6
|
7.7
|
8.42
|
Surgery on admission (participants) [Number] | |||||||
Evacuation epidural hematoma |
0
0%
|
2
6.5%
|
1
2%
|
0
0%
|
1
3%
|
5
10.4%
|
9
4.5%
|
Evacuation subdural hematoma |
2
11.1%
|
5
16.1%
|
13
26%
|
5
25%
|
14
42.4%
|
7
14.6%
|
46
23%
|
Evacuation intracerebral hematoma or contusion |
1
5.6%
|
0
0%
|
1
2%
|
1
5%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.1%
|
4
2%
|
Non-central nervous system injury |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
2%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.1%
|
2
1%
|
No surgery on admission |
15
83.3%
|
24
77.4%
|
34
68%
|
14
70%
|
18
54.5%
|
34
70.8%
|
139
69.5%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Glasgow Outcome Scale |
---|---|
Description | Dichotomized to favorable outcome (good recovery or moderate disability) or to unfavorable outcome (severe disability or vegetative or dead) |
Time Frame | at 6 months after injury |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat. Multiple imputation for missing 6-month GOS data was performed assuming data were missing at random using chained equations (R, R Foundation for Statistical Computing).The imputation was based on a logistic regression model with baseline covariates. Results were aggregated over 20 imputed sets using variance formula by Rubin. |
Arm/Group Title | Epo1 Group | Epo2 Group | Placebo Group | TT7 Group | TT10 Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury (Epo1/TT10 arm and Epo1/TT7 arm combined) | Patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6hrs of injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury (Epo2/TT10 arm and Epo2/TT7 arm combined) | Patients received saline (Placebo/TT10 arm and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 7 gm/dl (Epo1/TT7 arm, Epo2/TT7 arm, and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 10 gm/dl (Epo1/TT10 arm, Epo2/TT10 arm, and Placebo/TT10 arm combined) |
Measure Participants | 35 | 57 | 89 | 87 | 94 |
Favorable outcome |
17
94.4%
|
17
54.8%
|
34
68%
|
37
185%
|
31
93.9%
|
Unfavorable outcome |
18
100%
|
40
129%
|
55
110%
|
50
250%
|
63
190.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Epo2 Group, Placebo Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | The primary analysis plan was a futility trial of the Epo 2 regimen arm. We hypothesized that 30% of subjects in the placebo group would have a favorable outcome at six months and there would be no interaction between the Epo and the transfusion threshold groups. Using a one-sided alpha of 0.15, a sample size of 62 subjects in the Epo 2 regimen group and 100 subjects in the placebo group provided 91% power to test the futility hypothesis. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .01 |
Comments | H0: Proportion of participants expected to have a favorable GOS outcome in the Epo2 group - in Placebo group is >= 0.2. H1: Proportion in Epo2 group - in Placebo group < 0.2 | |
Method | Futility analysis | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Epo1 Group, Placebo Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | The primary analysis plan was a futility trial of the Epo 1 regimen arm. We hypothesized that 30% of subjects in the placebo group would have a favorable outcome at six months and there would be no interaction between the Epo and the transfusion threshold groups. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.13 |
Comments | H0: Proportion of participants expected to have a favorable GOS outcome in the Epo1 group - in Placebo group is >= 0.2. H1: Proportion in Epo1 group - in Placebo group < 0.2 | |
Method | Futility analysis | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TT7 Group, TT10 Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | We hypothesized that 40% of the patients in the TT7 group would have a favorable GOS score and that there would be no interaction between the Epo and TT groups. Assuming a 2-sided test with an alpha level of 0.05, we estimated that a sample size of 200 patients would provide 80% power to detect a 20% absolute increase in the GOS score for the TT10 group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .34 |
Comments | ||
Method | 2-sample test of proportions | |
Comments |
Title | Disability Rating Scale |
---|---|
Description | Disability rating scale was a secondary outcome measure for the transfusion threshold analysis. Disability rating scale ranges from 0 to 30, with 30 indicating death and 0 indicating return to normal status. |
Time Frame | at 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat analysis |
Arm/Group Title | TT7 Group | TT10 Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 7 gm/dl (Epo1/TT7 arm, Epo2/TT7 arm, and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 10 gm/dl (Epo1/TT10 arm, Epo2/TT10 arm, and Placebo/TT10 arm combined) |
Measure Participants | 87 | 94 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [units on a scale] |
5
|
8
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Epo1 Group, Epo2 Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .06 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Mortality Rate |
---|---|
Description | mortality rate was a secondary outcome measure for the Epo randomization, and a primary safety outcome measure for the transfusion threshold randomization |
Time Frame | up to 6 months after injury |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat analysis |
Arm/Group Title | Epo1 Group | Epo2 Group | Placebo Group | TT7 Group | TT10 Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients received 500 IU/kg erythropoietin within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury (Epo1/TT10 arm and Epo1/TT7 arm combined) | Patients received 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury (Epo2/TT10 arm and Epo2/TT7 arm combined) | Patients received saline (Placebo/TT10 arm and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin maintained at least 7 gm/dl (Epo1/TT7 arm, Epo2/TT7 arm, and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 10 gm/dl (Epo1/TT10 arm, Epo2/TT10 arm, and Placebo/TT10 arm combined) |
Measure Participants | 38 | 64 | 98 | 99 | 101 |
Died |
6
33.3%
|
7
22.6%
|
18
36%
|
14
70%
|
17
51.5%
|
Survived |
32
177.8%
|
57
183.9%
|
80
160%
|
85
425%
|
84
254.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Epo2 Group, Placebo Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .25 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Epo1 Group, Placebo Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .75 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TT7 Group, TT10 Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .72 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Title | Incidence of Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) |
---|---|
Description | development of ARDS was a primary safety outcome for the transfusion threshold randomization |
Time Frame | within 30 days after injury |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat analysis |
Arm/Group Title | TT7 Group | TT10 Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 7 gm/dl (Epo1/TT7 arm, Epo2/TT7 arm, and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 10 gm/dl (Epo1/TT10 arm, Epo2/TT10 arm, and Placebo/TT10 arm combined) |
Measure Participants | 99 | 101 |
Developed ARDS |
16
88.9%
|
25
80.6%
|
Did not develop ARDS |
83
461.1%
|
76
245.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Epo1 Group, Epo2 Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .08 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.79 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .93 to 3.45 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Incidence of Infection |
---|---|
Description | occurrence of infection was a primary safety outcome for the transfusion threshold randomization |
Time Frame | within 30 days after injury |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat analysis |
Arm/Group Title | TT7 Group | TT10 Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 7 gm/dl (Epo1/TT7 arm, Epo2/TT7 arm, and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 10 gm/dl (Epo1/TT10 group, Epo2/TT10 group, and Placebo/TT10 group combined) |
Measure Participants | 99 | 101 |
Developed one or more infections |
27
150%
|
36
116.1%
|
Did not develop infection |
72
400%
|
65
209.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Epo1 Group, Epo2 Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .26 |
Comments | ||
Method | 2-sample test - equality of proportions | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -.08 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -.22 to .05 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Serious adverse events were reported for 30 days after injury | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Each patient is represented twice in the table (once in the Epo1/Epo2/Placebo groups and once in the TT7/TT10 groups) | |||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Epo1 Group | Epo2 Group | Placebo Group | TT7 Group | TT10 Group | |||||
Arm/Group Description | Patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, at 24 and 48 hrs after injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury (Epo1/TT10 arm and Epo1/TT7 arm combined) | Patients received erythropoietin 500 IU/kg within 6 hrs of injury, and at 9 and 16 days after injury (Epo1/TT10 arm and Epo1/TT7 arm combined) | Patients received saline (Placebo/TT10 arm and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 7 gm/dl (Epo1/TT7 arm, Epo2/TT7 arm, and Placebo/TT7 arm combined) | Patients had hemoglobin concentration maintained at least 10 gm/dl (Epo1/TT10 arm, Epo2/TT10 arm, and Placebo/TT10 arm combined) | |||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||||
Epo1 Group | Epo2 Group | Placebo Group | TT7 Group | TT10 Group | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||||
Epo1 Group | Epo2 Group | Placebo Group | TT7 Group | TT10 Group | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 29/38 (76.3%) | 50/64 (78.1%) | 78/98 (79.6%) | 85/99 (85.9%) | 93/101 (92.1%) | |||||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||||||
Severe anemia | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Other severe hematologic disorder | 2/38 (5.3%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 2/98 (2%) | 3/99 (3%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||||||
acute myocardial infarction | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
cardiac arrest with CPR | 2/38 (5.3%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 2/98 (2%) | 2/99 (2%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
Hypotension due to barbiturate coma | 2/38 (5.3%) | 4/64 (6.3%) | 6/98 (6.1%) | 3/99 (3%) | 9/101 (8.9%) | |||||
Pulmonary embolus | 0/38 (0%) | 4/64 (6.3%) | 3/98 (3.1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 6/101 (5.9%) | |||||
Shock | 10/38 (26.3%) | 15/64 (23.4%) | 19/98 (19.4%) | 25/99 (25.3%) | 19/101 (18.8%) | |||||
Endocrine disorders | ||||||||||
Diabetes insipidus | 1/38 (2.6%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 8/98 (8.2%) | 7/99 (7.1%) | 4/101 (4%) | |||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||
Abdominal compartment syndrome | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
incarcerated inguinal hernia | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Pancreatitis | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 2/98 (2%) | 0/99 (0%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
peritonitis | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 2/98 (2%) | 0/99 (0%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
Wound infection, non-central nervous system | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Pneumonia | 11/38 (28.9%) | 8/64 (12.5%) | 14/98 (14.3%) | 13/99 (13.1%) | 20/101 (19.8%) | |||||
Sepsis | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Septic shock | 1/38 (2.6%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 1/98 (1%) | 3/99 (3%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||||
Carotid cavernous fistula | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Infected eye injury | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Hemothorax | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Osteomyelitis | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Rhabdomyalysis | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Tongue laceration | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
internal jugular vein injury | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||
Brain death | 3/38 (7.9%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 5/98 (5.1%) | 6/99 (6.1%) | 4/101 (4%) | |||||
Brain tissue hypoxia | 3/38 (7.9%) | 4/64 (6.3%) | 8/98 (8.2%) | 10/99 (10.1%) | 5/101 (5%) | |||||
delayed or recurrent intracranial hemorrhage | 10/38 (26.3%) | 13/64 (20.3%) | 18/98 (18.4%) | 15/99 (15.2%) | 26/101 (25.7%) | |||||
hydrocephalus | 1/38 (2.6%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 2/98 (2%) | 3/99 (3%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
intracranial hypertension | 7/38 (18.4%) | 14/64 (21.9%) | 28/98 (28.6%) | 22/99 (22.2%) | 27/101 (26.7%) | |||||
meningitis or ventriculitis | 2/38 (5.3%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 2/98 (2%) | 3/99 (3%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
wound dehiscence | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
stroke | 3/38 (7.9%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||||||
Acute renal failure | 2/38 (5.3%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 3/98 (3.1%) | 3/99 (3%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
Severe metabolic acidosis | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 2/98 (2%) | 1/99 (1%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Severe mixed acid-base disorder | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Electrolyte disturbance | 0/38 (0%) | 4/64 (6.3%) | 7/98 (7.1%) | 5/99 (5.1%) | 6/101 (5.9%) | |||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||||
Adult respiratory distress syndrome | 3/38 (7.9%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 6/98 (6.1%) | 2/99 (2%) | 9/101 (8.9%) | |||||
Airway obstruction post-extubation | 0/38 (0%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 1/98 (1%) | 2/99 (2%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Severe atelectasis | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Pleural effusion | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Pneumothorax | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 1/98 (1%) | 2/99 (2%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||||
Lower extremity deep venous thrombophlebitis | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Gangrene of extremities | 2/38 (5.3%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Upper extremity deep venous thrombophlebitis | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||||
Epo1 Group | Epo2 Group | Placebo Group | TT7 Group | TT10 Group | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 34/38 (89.5%) | 57/64 (89.1%) | 87/98 (88.8%) | 85/99 (85.9%) | 93/101 (92.1%) | |||||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||||||
Anemia | 24/38 (63.2%) | 33/64 (51.6%) | 60/98 (61.2%) | 66/99 (66.7%) | 51/101 (50.5%) | |||||
Other hematologic disorder | 13/38 (34.2%) | 20/64 (31.3%) | 43/98 (43.9%) | 37/99 (37.4%) | 39/101 (38.6%) | |||||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||||||
Atrial arrhythmia | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Hypertension | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Hypotension from barbiturate coma | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Hypotension | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 2/98 (2%) | 3/99 (3%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Endocrine disorders | ||||||||||
Diabetes insipidus | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Hyperglycemia | 3/38 (7.9%) | 0/64 (0%) | 4/98 (4.1%) | 4/99 (4%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
Hypoglycemia | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 2/98 (2%) | 1/99 (1%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Eye disorders | ||||||||||
Exposure keratoconjunctivitis | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 2/98 (2%) | 2/99 (2%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||
Upper GI bleeding | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Ileus | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||||
Elevated transaminases | 11/38 (28.9%) | 14/64 (21.9%) | 26/98 (26.5%) | 25/99 (25.3%) | 26/101 (25.7%) | |||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||
Wound infection | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 2/98 (2%) | 1/99 (1%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Urinary tract infection | 1/38 (2.6%) | 5/64 (7.8%) | 7/98 (7.1%) | 7/99 (7.1%) | 6/101 (5.9%) | |||||
Bacteremia | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 3/98 (3.1%) | 2/99 (2%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Wound infection, non-central nervous system | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||||
Wound dehiscence | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Bleeding complicating a procedure | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Rhabdomyalysis | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Febrile transfusion reaction | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||||||
Diffuse edema | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Hypothermia | 2/38 (5.3%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||
Cerebrospinal fluid leak | 2/38 (5.3%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 2/98 (2%) | 1/99 (1%) | 4/101 (4%) | |||||
Brain tissue hypoxia | 9/38 (23.7%) | 12/64 (18.8%) | 21/98 (21.4%) | 21/99 (21.2%) | 21/101 (20.8%) | |||||
Delayed or recurrent intracranial hematoma | 7/38 (18.4%) | 5/64 (7.8%) | 12/98 (12.2%) | 11/99 (11.1%) | 13/101 (12.9%) | |||||
Hydrocephalus | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) | 1/99 (1%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Intracranial hypertension | 9/38 (23.7%) | 9/64 (14.1%) | 15/98 (15.3%) | 17/99 (17.2%) | 16/101 (15.8%) | |||||
Pneumocephalus | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Seizure | 3/38 (7.9%) | 3/64 (4.7%) | 5/98 (5.1%) | 4/99 (4%) | 7/101 (6.9%) | |||||
Subgaleal cerebrospinal fluid collection | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||||||
acute renal dysfunction | 0/38 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 5/98 (5.1%) | 4/99 (4%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Metabolic acidosis | 3/38 (7.9%) | 0/64 (0%) | 4/98 (4.1%) | 4/99 (4%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
Mixed acid-base abnormality | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 0/99 (0%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Electrolyte imbalance | 12/38 (31.6%) | 20/64 (31.3%) | 36/98 (36.7%) | 28/99 (28.3%) | 40/101 (39.6%) | |||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||||
Respiratory acidosis | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Airway obstruction post-extubation | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 0/98 (0%) | 2/99 (2%) | 0/101 (0%) | |||||
Atelectasis | 14/38 (36.8%) | 14/64 (21.9%) | 19/98 (19.4%) | 21/99 (21.2%) | 26/101 (25.7%) | |||||
Pleural effusion | 0/38 (0%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 6/98 (6.1%) | 4/99 (4%) | 4/101 (4%) | |||||
Pneumothorax | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 6/98 (6.1%) | 6/99 (6.1%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Sinusitis | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/64 (0%) | 1/98 (1%) | 1/99 (1%) | 1/101 (1%) | |||||
Tracheobronchitis | 0/38 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | 2/98 (2%) | 0/99 (0%) | 3/101 (3%) | |||||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||||||
Decubitis ulcer | 2/38 (5.3%) | 0/64 (0%) | 2/98 (2%) | 2/99 (2%) | 2/101 (2%) | |||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||||
Lower extremity deep venous thrombophlebitis | 1/38 (2.6%) | 2/64 (3.1%) | 4/98 (4.1%) | 2/99 (2%) | 5/101 (5%) | |||||
Upper extremity deep vein thrombophlebitis | 7/38 (18.4%) | 7/64 (10.9%) | 6/98 (6.1%) | 10/99 (10.1%) | 10/101 (9.9%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Claudia Robertson, MD |
---|---|
Organization | Baylor College of Medicine |
Phone | 713-873-2792 |
claudiar@bcm.edu |
- P01NS038660
- P01NS038660