Opioid Free Anesthesia: What About Patient Comfort?

Sponsor
Université Libre de Bruxelles (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02882035
Collaborator
Jules Bordet Institute (Other)
66
1
2
10
6.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

66 female patients undergoing breast cancer surgery were randomized in the Jules Bordet Institute, the Belgian oncology institute. One group received an opioid anesthesia, the other group an opioid free one. The hypothesis of this study was that opioid free anesthesia improves the postoperative quality of recovery of anesthesia.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: OFA
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Opioids used as part of balanced anesthesia have known undesired side effects such as:

respiratory depression, post-operative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, difficulty voiding and ileus.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether opioid free anesthesia influences the quality of recovery. A multimodal approach combining ketamine, lidocaine and clonidine was used as an alternative for an opioid based anesthesia.

The hypothesis of this study was that patient comfort and satisfaction level after an opioid free anesthesia would be higher compared to after a more traditional opioid anesthesia.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
66 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Opioid Free Anesthesia: What About Patient Comfort?
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: OFA (opioid free anesthesia)

All drugs were given IV. Induction in the opioid free group began with a loading dose of clonidine (0.2 mcg kg-1), a bolus of ketamine (0.3 mg kg -1) lidocaine (1.5 mg kg -1) and a bolus of propofol (2-3 mg kg -1). General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (MAC: 1) (adapted according to hemodynamic stability). Upon the incision, acetaminophen (1000 mg) and diclofenac (75 mg) were given in both groups. A bolus of ketamine (0.2mg kg -1) was given if necessary in the opioid free group (up to three bolus max. were permitted). A bolus of piritramide (0.03 mg kg -1) was administered upon subcutaneous closure. Postoperative pain was treated with IV acetaminophen (1000 mg) every 6 h for the first 24 hours and IV diclofenac (75 mg) every 12 h for the first 24 hours. Patients received a PCIA (patient-controlled intravenous analgesia) pump of piritramide.

Other: OFA

No Intervention: OA (opioid anesthesia)

All drugs were given IV. Induction in the opioid group began with remifentanil TCI, a bolus of ketamine (0.3 mg kg -1) lidocaine (1.5 mg kg -1) and a bolus of propofol (2-3 mg kg -1). General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (MAC: 1). Upon the incision, acetaminophen (1000 mg) and diclofenac (75 mg) were given in both groups. A bolus of piritramide (0.03 mg kg -1) was administered upon subcutaneous closure. Postoperative pain was treated with IV acetaminophen (1000 mg) every 6 h for the first 24 hours and IV diclofenac (75 mg) every 12 h for the first 24 hours. Patients received a PCIA (patient-controlled intravenous analgesia) pump of piritramide.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. QoR-40 [24 hours post-operatively]

    Patient comfort was assessed via the QoR-40 questionnaire 24hours post-operatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Post-operative NRS [during 24 hours post-operative]

    Pain assessment via NRS

  2. Post-operative piritramide consumption [during the first 24 hours post-operative]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Oncological patients undergoing a total mastectomy or lumpectomy associated with a total axillary dissection were screened.

  • Patients with an ASA physical status of II were included.

  • Knowledge of either French, English or Dutch was required.

Exclusion criteria were the following:
  • Allergy or contraindications to one of the study drugs, renal failure, hepatic failure, hyperthyroidism, AV block 2 or 3 or severe bradycardia, left ventricular failure, unstable blood pressure, epilepsy and psychiatric disturbance.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Institut Jules Bordet Brussels Belgium 1000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Jules Bordet Institute

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sarah Saxena, M.D., Université Libre de Bruxelles
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02882035
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CE2261
First Posted:
Aug 29, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Aug 29, 2016
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Keywords provided by Sarah Saxena, M.D., Université Libre de Bruxelles

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 29, 2016