Precision Feedback to Improve Health Care Quality
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This cluster-randomized trial will assess the effectiveness of a precision feedback service on anesthesia provider performance. The precision feedback service enhances a standard audit and feedback (A&F) email with a brief message and visual display about high-value performance information. The control arm will receive a standard "one size fits most" A&F email that is currently sent to anesthesia providers each month. Hypothesis: Providers receiving precision feedback will increase a) care quality for improvable measures and b) email engagement (click-through and dashboard login rates) when compared with providers receiving standard A&F emails. We will assess unintended consequences in a mixed-methods process evaluation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: precision-enhanced feedback email messages Providers receive an enhanced monthly email containing precision audit and feedback (A&F). |
Behavioral: precision-enhanced feedback email messages
Providers receive customized messages prioritizing metrics in an optimal formatting.
|
Active Comparator: standard feedback email messages Providers receive the standard "one size fits most" A&F monthly email. |
Behavioral: standard feedback email messages
Providers receive metrics in a common format.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Measure success rate (M) for operative cases of anesthesia care providers [Up to 2 years]
The primary outcome for the cluster-randomized controlled trial is the measure success rate (M) for operative cases of anesthesia care providers, where: M = sum of all operative case measurement successes / number of all operative case measurements
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Average email click-through rate (CTR) [Up to 2 years]
CTR = 100 x (number of recipient's emails with a clicked link) / (total number of emails)
- Average dashboard login rate (L) [Up to 2 years]
L = 100 x (number of months with an email recipient's dashboard login event) / (total number of months)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria (assessed before interventional period):
- Participation in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) provider feedback email program.
Exclusion Criteria (assessed after interventional period):
-
Ended participation in the MPOG provider feedback email program for any reason during the study period
-
Changed professional roles (e.g. transitioned from resident to attending) before the end of the intervention period
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan | United States | 48109 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Michigan
- National Library of Medicine (NLM)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Zach Landis-Lewis, University of Michigan
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- HUM00194224
- R01LM013894-01