Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study. (PCEA-IMG)

Sponsor
University Hospital, Limoges (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02563821
Collaborator
(none)
37
1
2
37.2
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Background : Recently, delivery of local anaesthetics via Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) has been shown to improve labour epidural analgesia compared to delivery via Continuous Epidural Infusion (CEI).

Purpose : However, the superiority of PIEB compared to CEI has not been investigated for third trimester voluntary termination of pregnancy.

We hypothesized that PIEB administration would result in a better degree of satisfaction of the patients compared with CEI for third trimester legally induced abortion analgesia.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Abstract : The recent technical advances in antenatal diagnosis have led to an increase number of legally induced abortion at the third trimester of pregnancy. Psychological pain is frequently associated to physical pain in these kinds of interventions. So anaesthetists are more and more involved in voluntary termination of pregnancy analgesia.

In France, Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with CEI mode is usually used for voluntary termination of pregnancy analgesia. But recent studies have shown that PIEB mode as compared to CEI mode increases maternal satisfaction during labour. This may be attributed to a more extensive spread of epidural solution when delivered as a bolus rather than continuous infusion.

Few trials have been interested in investigating the best mode of PCEA for legally induced abortion analgesia.

This study includes women who undergo voluntary third semester termination of pregnancy. Patients are randomized to PIEB or CEI for pain analgesia. In this randomized, double-blind study, the investigators assess the degree of satisfaction of the patients (primary outcome), the incidence of motor block, total drug consumption and adverse events (secondary outcomes) between the two study groups.

The different values are collected during the intervention on a specific paper for each patient and the degree of satisfaction is reported on this paper just before the patient leaves the birth room (approximatively 2 hours after the expulsion).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
37 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study.
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 5, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 11, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 11, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: PCEA-DC

Injection of a 2 mL initial epidural loading dose consisting of a blend (10 mL) of levobupivacaine 20 mg, sufentanil 10 µg to assure the absence of motor block and so exclude intrathecal placement of the epidural catheter. Injection of the rest of the loading dose (8mL). In this group the pump is programmed to deliver a continuous infusion at 10 mL /h consisting of levobupivacaine 0,573 mg/mL, sufentanil 0,37 µg/mL, clonidine 1,38 µg/ mL. Additional 5 mL patient-activated boluses will be allowed with a lockout interval of 10 minutes. If the parturient feels she has inadequate analgesia after having activated the PCEA bolus twice in a thirty minutes period, an additional manual bolus of 6 mL of levobupivacaine 2,5 mg/mL will be administered until the Pain Visual Analog Scale (PVAS) is < 3/10.

Procedure: Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia for third trimester termination of preganancy analgesia

Drug: Levobupivacaine

Drug: sufentanil

Drug: clonidine

Device: epidural catheter

Active Comparator: PCEA-BIP

Injection of a 2 mL initial epidural loading dose consisting of a blend (10 mL) of levobupivacaine 20 mg, sufentanil 10 µg to assure the absence of motor block and so exclude intrathecal placement of the epidural catheter. Injection of the rest of the loadind dose (8 mL) In this group the pump is programmed to deliver automated mandatory boluses of 5 mL consisting of levobupivacaine 0,573 mg/mL, sufentanil 0,37 µg/mL, clonidine 1,38 µg/mL every 30 minutes. Additional 5 mL patient-activated boluses will be allowed with a lockout interval of 10 minutes. If the parturient feels she has inadequate analgesia after having activated the PCEA bolus twice in a thirty minutes period, an additional manual bolus of 6 mL of levobupivacaine 2,5 mg/mL will be administered until the Pain Visual Analog Scale (PVAS) is < 3/10 (0 = no pain and 10 = insufferable pain).

Procedure: Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia for third trimester termination of preganancy analgesia

Drug: Levobupivacaine

Drug: sufentanil

Drug: clonidine

Device: epidural catheter

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. satisfaction visual analog scale (SVAS) measurment [procedure]

    The degree of satisfaction is assessed using a satisfaction visual analog scale (SVAS) where 0 corresponded to " completely unsatisfied " and 100 to " completely satisfied ".

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number and intensity of motor block [procedure]

    Incidence of motor block determined by number and intensity

  2. Number of call of the aneshetist for insufficient analgesia [procedure]

    Number of call of the aneshetist for insufficient analgesia

  3. Number of doses of complementary manual bolus [procedure]

    Number of doses of complementary manual bolus administered

  4. Obstetrical informations [procedure]

    time of the intervention, doses of oxytocin and prostin used, instrumental delivery

  5. Numbers of Adverse events [procedure]

    Numbers of Adverse events (Pruritus, nausea / vomitings, episodes of arterial low blood pressure)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • age ≥ 18 years

  • ASA 1 or 2 (healthy women)

  • pregnancy at third trimester

  • willingness of voluntary interrupt the pregnancy

  • women affiliated to french health social system

  • written informed consent from every patient

Exclusion Criteria:
  • contraindications to epidural analgesia

  • opioids consumption within the last 24 hours

  • patient's unwillingness

  • inability to comprehend or comply with the procedure

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Universiy hospital Limoges France 87000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Limoges

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick SENGES, MD, University Hospital, Limoges

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Limoges
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02563821
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • I14032 (PCEA-IMG)
First Posted:
Sep 30, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Jan 22, 2019
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2019

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 22, 2019