Intraligamental Local Anesthesia Versus Infiltration Technique for Extraction of Grade II Mobility Maxillary Molars

Sponsor
Minia University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05875350
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
1.5
40.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study aims to assess the use of intraligamental local anesthetic injection compared to buccal infiltration for extraction of maxillary molars suffering grade II mobility in terms of pain control and extraction duration.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Intraligamental local anesthetic injection
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of Low Dose Intraligamental Local Anesthesia as an Alternative for Infiltration Technique for Extraction of Grade II Mobility Maxillary Molars: Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2023
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 30, 2023
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 15, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intraligamental local anesthetic injection

Procedure: Intraligamental local anesthetic injection
The intraligamental technique was administered using ligajet intraligamentary jet injector (Micro Mega Company) containing Articaine hydrochloride 4% with adrenaline 1:200000 (ArtPharma Dent, inc, Egypt)

No Intervention: Buccal infiltration local anesthetic injection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain using visual analogue scale [immediately after injection]

    visual analogue scale (VAS) was used in which a pain score was recorded for each patient just after local anesthetic adminstration. The VAS score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme unbearable pain)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • healthy patients (class I category according to American society of anesthesiologists )

  • Age range: 20 - 60 years of age,

  • Either genders who are seeking dental extraction of maxillary molar teeth diagnosed with grade II mobility.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with tooth that require trans osseous extraction

  • Badly broken down coronal structure of the tooth to be extracted

  • Patients with significant medical conditions

  • Alcoh intake

  • Patients on drugs that affect the central nervous systems

  • Patients who reported the use of drugs that might interfere with pain sensitivity

  • Pregnant or lactating women

  • Patients who suffer from hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University Minya Egypt 2431412

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Minia University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Tarek Abdelbarry, Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Minia University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05875350
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 716
First Posted:
May 25, 2023
Last Update Posted:
May 31, 2023
Last Verified:
May 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 31, 2023