Study of Two-step Anesthesia in Posterior Vitrectomy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
A prospective, randomised, single-masked comparison of local anaesthetic approaches including topical anesthesia combined sub-conjunctival anesthesia(two-step anesthesia) for minimally invasive vitrectomy(TAMIV)vs peribulbar block vs retrobulbar block
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Purpose: topical anesthesia combined sub-conjunctival anesthesia(two-step anesthesia) for minimally invasive vitrectomy Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trail is conducted at Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital. Selected group of 60 patients with retinal-vitreous diseases will be randomized divided into 3 groups and underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy. Group1 uses two-step anesthesia , whereas Group 2 uses retrobulbar anesthesia, group 3 uses peribulbar anesthesia. A 5-point Visual Analogue Pain Scale is used to assess patients' pain score and surgeon's ease while operating. Any complications therefore will be made note of.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: retrobulbar anesthesia group 2% lidocaine 4ml injected into retrobulbar space |
Procedure: retrobulbar anesthesia
2% lidocaine 4ml injected into retrobulbar space
|
Active Comparator: peribulbar anesthesia group 2% lidocaine 4 to 8ml injected into peribulbar space |
Procedure: peribulbar anesthesia
2% lidocaine 4 to 8ml injected into peribulbar space
|
Experimental: two step anesthesia group conjunctival cul-de-sac anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride drops three times + 2% lidocaine 0.6 to 0.8ml subconjunctival injection |
Procedure: two step anesthesia
conjunctival cul-de-sac anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride drops three times + 2% lidocaine 0.6 to 0.8ml subconjunctival injection
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- pain scores [During surgery]
5-point Visual Analogue Pain Scale(VAPS): Grade 1: No pain or discomfort; Grade 2: mild pain or discomfort; Grade 3: moderate pain or discomfort; Grade 4: severe pain or discomfort;
Secondary Outcome Measures
- surgeon's ease [During surgery]
Grade 1: No discomfort; Grade 2: mild discomfort; Grade 3: moderate discomfort; Grade 4: severe discomfort;
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR);
-
Vitreous haemorrhage (VH);
-
Retinal detachment (RD);
-
Retinal vein occlusion(RVO);
-
Other diseases (idiopathic macular hole, macular pucker and high myopic maculopathy);
-
Silicone oil-filled eye.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Communication problems;
-
Allergy to amide-type local anaesthetic agents;
-
History of vitreoretinal surgery or orbital surgery;
-
Orbital deformity;
-
With episcleral adjunct surgery;
-
Trauma;
-
Keratitis;
-
Conjunctivitis and active uveitis.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Wensheng Li | Shanghai | China |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University
Investigators
- Study Director: Wensheng Li, Shanghai Aier Eye Hosptial
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Bahçecioglu H, Unal M, Artunay O, Rasier R, Sarici A. Posterior vitrectomy under topical anesthesia. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;42(2):272-7.
- Chan WM, Loo AV, Tam BS. Topical anesthesia in posterior vitrectomy. Retina. 2000;20(5):563-5.
- Schrader WF, Schargus M, Schneider E, Josifova T. Risks and sequelae of scleral perforation during peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):885-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.029.
- Takaschima A, Marchioro P, Sakae TM, Porporatti AL, Mezzomo LA, De Luca Canto G. Risk of Hemorrhage during Needle-Based Ophthalmic Regional Anesthesia in Patients Taking Antithrombotics: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0147227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147227. eCollection 2016. Review.
- SHIRB2018013