Combined Spinal Epidural Urinary Retention

Sponsor
Northwestern University (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT01597791
Collaborator
(none)
56
1
2
56.3
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that many parturients can, in fact, spontaneously micturate with low dose combined spinal epidural analgesic doses given for labor and that Foley catheterization is unnecessary in the majority of these parturients. At Prentice Women's Hospital, almost 9000 women annually receive neuraxial labor analgesia and 98% of those receive Foley catheters. By potentially reducing the necessity for Foley catheters, the investigators should be able to ultimately reduce the rate of bacteriuria, urinary tract infections and urethritis leading to unnecessary treatment with antibiotics, as well as reduce costs of placing unnecessary Foley catheter.The hypothesis is parturients receiving low dose combined spinal epidural analgesia for analgesia after induction of labor who are randomized to a spontaneous micturition protocol will require fewer Foley catheter placements and demonstrate a lower incidence of positive urine culture postpartum than those who undergo standard Foley catheter placement.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Foley catheter
  • Other: No foley catheter
N/A

Detailed Description

Participation in the study will begin at the patient's request for labor analgesia. The patient will be asked to urinate and a post void residual (PVR) will be measured via ultrasonography. If the PVR is >100mL, the patient will be excluded from the study. If CSF is not obtained during CSE placement or the CSE technique is abandoned for any other reason, the patient will be excluded. If the PVR is < 100mL and the combined spinal epidural analgesia is successful, they will be randomized to receive either routine Foley catheter placement or begin the spontaneous micturition protocol. Last cervical exam and VRS pain will be recorded at this time.

Subjects will be prepared in the usual fashion for the combined spinal epidural with hemodynamic monitoring and intravenous (IV) access.

The anesthesiologist will perform a combined spinal epidural analgesia per routine with the subject in the sitting position using sterile technique at the L3-4 interspace (± one vertebral interspace). The epidural space will be found using loss of resistance technique with either 3 mL of air or saline and a 17G Touhy needle. After the epidural space is identified, the dura will be punctured with a 27G Pencan and 2.5mg of plain bupivacaine + 15 μg fentanyl will be injected. The epidural catheter will be inserted to 3-5cm into the epidural space and a test dose of 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine + 1:200,000 epinephrine will be injected. The epidural catheter will be secured and the PCEA initiated with the standard infusion rate and patient administered boluses using 0.06% bupivacaine + 2mcg/mL fentanyl. Post-procedure vital signs will be monitored in the usual fashion.

Patients randomized to the control group will have a Foley catheter placed after the CSE is performed as is the usual practice at this institution. Their bladder volume will be assessed via ultrasonography before Foley catheter placement. The volume of urine collected in the Foley bag will be used to validate our ultrasonographic measurements.

Patients randomized to the spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals. First, the patient's bladder volume is measured via ultrasonography; this is followed by an attempt at spontaneous micturition. The patient will have an attempt at spontaneous micturition only if their bladder contains >100mL of urine. This ensures inability to micturate is not due to insufficient urine in the bladder prior to their attempt. An ultrasonographic measurement of their postvoid residual volume will follow their attempt to spontaneously micturate, to ensure the patient does not have urinary retention necessitating Foley catheter placement.

The first attempt at spontaneous micturition is two hours after the spinal analgesic dose is injected. A study by Campbell et al. demonstrated no urinary retention with this intrathecal dose, but it is a possibility that the spinal dose may still be present and have a differing effect than the epidural analgesic dose. As a result of this possibility, we decided that if a patient has urinary retention at this first attempt, 2 hours post injection of the spinal dose, they will have a straight catheterization and be given another chance at spontaneous micturition more than 3 hours after the spinal dose was injected. This ensures the spinal dose has completely worn off and the epidural analgesic dose is in effect before committing the patient to a bed pan or Foley catheter.

Most patients will be evaluated at least twice for ability to spontaneously micturate and have their PVR volumes accessed via ultrasonography before being assigned to either a bed pan every 2 hours or a Foley catheter placement. If the patient is able to spontaneously micturate twice and their PVR is <100mL, they will be assigned to a bed pan every 2 hours. If a patient is unable to micturate with a PVR >100mL, they will receive a Foley catheter.

The spontaneous micturition algorithm allows for a maximum of 3 attempts at micturition before a patient is committed to either a bed pan every 2 hours or Foley catheter placement. In the event that a patient is able to spontaneously micturate but has incomplete bladder emptying with a PVR 100-250mL, they will be allowed to continue in the algorithm for a third and final attempt at spontaneous micturition. If the patient is able to spontaneously micturate at this last attempt with a PVR volume <100mL, they will be assigned to a bed pan every 2 hours but if their PVR remains >100mL they will have a Foley catheter placed.

On occasion, patients need a rescue bolus of higher concentration local anesthetic during labor for breakthrough pain. If this occurs, the usual rebolus dose of up to 15mL of bupivacaine 0.125% will be given in incremental doses titrated to patient comfort. Following this rebolus, the infusion rate will be increased to 20ml/hr as is the usual practice. If a patient who was previously assigned to use a bed pan every 2 hours requires a rescue bolus of local anesthetic, their ability to spontaneously micturate will be reassessed 2 hours following the rebolus to evaluate for need for reassignment to Foley catheter placement with the higher doses of bupivacaine.

If a patient who was assigned to use a bed pan every 2 hours requires a second rebolus, they will receive another rebolus dose of up to 15mL of bupivacaine 0.125%, the concentration of the epidural bupivacaine infusion will be increased to bupivacaine 0.11% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL as is our usual practice and they will automatically be assigned to a Foley catheter placement.

If a study patient requires a cesarean delivery, a Foley catheter will be inserted at time of decision for cesarean delivery and removed 24 hours post procedure as is the standard practice at our institution.

The primary outcome (rate of positive urine culture) of this study will be assessed by collecting a twenty-four to forty-eight hour midstream urine sample and performing a urine culture. The clinical and laboratory criteria used to define a urinary tract infection in a woman immediately postpartum is unknown. If the patient is considered uncomplicated (normal female urinary physiology) then she would be treated only if she has symptoms. If the patient is considered complicated (pregnant urinary physiology) then she would be treated for bacterial growth on urine culture even if asymptomatic. For this reason and for the purpose of this study, if the patient is asymptomatic for urinary tract infection but has a positive urine culture with 50,000 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of bacteria, the patient's obstetrician will be notified and they will likely be treated with antibiotics for suspected urinary tract infection. This is more conservative than the current guidelines for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. If a positive urine culture is identified and patients is symptomatic (at least1 sign/symptom) with the number of colonies of bacteria exceed 10,000 CFU/ml, the obstetrician will be notified and they may be treated with antibiotics for suspected urinary tract infection. This is more conservative than the guidelines for catheter-related infections.

In addition to the primary outcome data, the following information will be collected after delivery: satisfaction with bladder treatment protocol (100 mm scale, 0 mm = not satisfied at all, 100 mm = very satisfied), total labor duration, length of stage 2, mode of delivery, presence and degree of lacerations, fetal weight, duration of Foley catheterization, time to first spontaneous void following delivery or Foley catheter removal, total fluids administered during labor and total dose of epidural analgesics.

In addition, a postvoid residual (PVR) will be assess via ultrasound at 8-24 hours following delivery or foley catheter removal to assess for postpartum urinary retention. If the PVR is found to be >100mL postpartum, this will be considered urinary retention and the obstetrician and co-investigator (urogynecologist) will be notified.

The following demographic data will also be collected: maternal age, height, weight, pre-pregnancy weight, and gestational age.

One telephone follow-up evaluation 8 weeks after delivery, the patient will be assessed for treatment of urinary tract infection and urinary retention during or after discharge from the hospital.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
56 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Do Women Receiving Low Dose Combined Spinal Epidural for Labor Analgesia Exhibit Less Bacteriuria Using a Urinary Retention Protocol Versus Routine Urinary Catheter Placement?
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 22, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Foley catheter

Control group will have a Foley catheter placed after the CSE is performed as is the usual practice at this institution.

Device: Foley catheter
Foley catheter placement after CSE.

Experimental: No Foley Catheter

Spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals.

Other: No foley catheter
Spontaneous Micturation/ Post Void Residual. the spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants With Positive Urine Culture [48 Hours]

    This study will be assessed by collecting a twenty-four to forty-eight hour midstream urine sample and performing a urine culture. The clinical and laboratory criteria used to define a urinary tract infection.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Nulliparous

  • Term (≥37 week gestation)

  • Healthy

  • ASA class 1-2

  • Who are being induced for labor who request labor analgesia and who successfully receive standard combined spinal epidural analgesia (verbal rating score for pain ≤ 1 after 10 min)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Women with ASA 3 or greater

  • BMI ≥40 kg/m2

  • Prior history of urge or stress incontinence or urinary retention before pregnancy

  • Women with a history of nephrolithiasis

  • Chronic urinary tract infections

  • Women whose post-void residual volume as assessed by ultrasonography is found to be

100ml before epidural placement will be excluded.

  • Women with an absolute or relative contraindication to the usual combined spinal epidural technique

  • Failed analgesia will be excluded

  • Women for whom the anesthesiologist selects an analgesic technique other than combined spinal epidural technique or fail to obtain CSF for CSE will be excluded

  • Women with fetal heart rate decelerations before request for analgesia will be excluded due to increased risk of cesarean delivery.

  • Women who experience inadequate labor analgesia due to nonfunctioning epidural catheter necessitating epidural replacement will be included but noted as a protocol violation.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Northwestern University Chicago Illinois United States 60611

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Northwestern University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeanette Bauchat, M.D., Northwestern University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Northwestern University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01597791
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • STU00005516
First Posted:
May 14, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Oct 5, 2018
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by Northwestern University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Foley Catheter No Foley Catheter
Arm/Group Description Control group will have a Foley catheter placed after the CSE is performed as is the usual practice at this institution. Foley catheter: Foley catheter placement after CSE. Spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals. No foley catheter: Spontaneous Micturation/ Post Void Residual. the spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 28 28
COMPLETED 20 18
NOT COMPLETED 8 10

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Foley Catheter No Foley Catheter Total
Arm/Group Description Control group will have a Foley catheter placed after the CSE is performed as is the usual practice at this institution. Foley catheter: Foley catheter placement after CSE. Spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals. No foley catheter: Spontaneous Micturation/ Post Void Residual. the spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 20 18 38
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
20
100%
18
100%
38
100%
>=65 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
34
(6.8)
33
(3.8)
33.4
(5.6)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
20
100%
18
100%
38
100%
Male
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
United States
20
100%
18
100%
38
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Positive Urine Culture
Description This study will be assessed by collecting a twenty-four to forty-eight hour midstream urine sample and performing a urine culture. The clinical and laboratory criteria used to define a urinary tract infection.
Time Frame 48 Hours

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Foley Catheter No Foley Catheter
Arm/Group Description Control group will have a Foley catheter placed after the CSE is performed as is the usual practice at this institution. Foley catheter: Foley catheter placement after CSE. Spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals. No foley catheter: Spontaneous Micturation/ Post Void Residual. the spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals.
Measure Participants 20 18
Number [participants with positive urine culture]
3
15%
1
5.6%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Foley Catheter, No Foley Catheter
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .05
Comments Calculated.
Method Fisher Exact
Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame 1 day
Adverse Event Reporting Description Urinary retention
Arm/Group Title Foley Catheter No Foley Catheter
Arm/Group Description Control group will have a Foley catheter placed after the CSE is performed as is the usual practice at this institution. Foley catheter: Foley catheter placement after CSE. Spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals. No foley catheter: Spontaneous Micturation/ Post Void Residual. the spontaneous micturition algorithm will be assessed for spontaneous micturition and post void residual (PVR) volumes via ultrasonography at regular time intervals.
All Cause Mortality
Foley Catheter No Foley Catheter
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/20 (0%) 0/18 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Foley Catheter No Foley Catheter
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/20 (0%) 0/18 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Foley Catheter No Foley Catheter
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 6/20 (30%) 6/18 (33.3%)
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Retention 6/20 (30%) 6 6/18 (33.3%) 6

Limitations/Caveats

The study was terminated early because of difficulty using the ultrasound device to estimate urinary bladder capacity and residual levels.

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Paul Fitzgerald
Organization Northwestern University
Phone 312-695-1064
Email p-fitzgerald2@northwestern.eud
Responsible Party:
Northwestern University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01597791
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • STU00005516
First Posted:
May 14, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Oct 5, 2018
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2018